IP Library Granted Patent US 7,379,828
Granted Patent B2
US 7,379,828 · App. 11/642,007 · Granted May 27, 2008

Method and apparatus for determining a quality metric of a measurement of a fluid parameter

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,379,828
App. No.
11/642,007
Granted
May 27, 2008
Kind
B2
Abstract

An apparatus for measuring a parameter of a fluid passing through a pipe includes a spatial array of at least two sensors disposed at different axial locations along the pipe. Each of the sensors provides a signal indicative of unsteady pressure within the pipe at a corresponding axial location of the pipe. A signal processor constructs at least a portion of a k-ω plot using the signals and detects at least one ridge in the k-ω plot. A slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of the parameter of the fluid. The signal processor determines a quality metric by comparing an accumulated energy (power) of k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge with an accumulated energy (power) of k-ω pairs along at least one ray extending in the k-ω plot. The quality metric is indicative of a quality of the at least one ridge.

Claims (150)

1. An apparatus for measuring a parameter of a fluid passing through a pipe, the apparatus comprising:

a spatial array of at least two sensors disposed at different axial locations along the pipe, each of the sensors providing a signal indicative of unsteady pressure within the pipe at a corresponding axial location of the pipe; and

a signal processor configured to:

construct from the signals at least a portion of a k-ω plot, where the k-ω plot is indicative of a dispersion relation for the unsteady pressure within the pipe,

detect at least one ridge in the k-ω plot, a slope of the at least one ridge being indicative of the parameter of the fluid, and

compare an accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge with an accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along at least one ray extending in the k-ω plot to determine a quality metric indicative of a quality of the at least one ridge.

2. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge is a sum of the powers associated with the k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge.

3. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray is a sum of the powers associated with the k-ω pairs along the at least one ray.

4. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray is an average accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along a plurality of rays.

5. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one ray has a slope indicative of a reference velocity.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the reference velocity is determined as a function of the best velocity.

7. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the reference velocity is independent of the best velocity.

8. The apparatus of claim 5 , wherein the signal processor is further configured to:

determine accumulated energies for a plurality of rays in the k-ω plot, the slopes of the plurality of rays indicating a plurality of trial velocities, and

select the reference velocity from the trial velocities by comparing the accumulated energies for the plurality of rays.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the trial velocities include: a trial velocity determined as a function of the best velocity and a trial velocity independent of the best velocity.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the signal processor determines the quality metric using:

Q

=

P

BEST

VELOCITY

-

P

REFERNCE

P

BEST

VELOCITY

+

P

REFERNCE

where P best velocity is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge in a linear scale, P reference is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray in a linear scale, and Q is the quality metric.

11. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the signal processor determines the quality metric using:

Q

=

P

BEST

VELOCITY

-

P

REFERNCE

P

BEST

VELOCITY

+

P

REFERNCE

where P best velocity is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge in a linear scale, P reference is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray in a linear scale, and Q is the quality metric.

12. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least one ridge includes a first acoustic ridge in a left plane of the k-ω plot and a second acoustic ridge in the right plane of the k-ω plot, and the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge is a sum of the powers associated with the k-ω pairs along the first and second acoustic ridges.

13. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the parameter of the fluid includes at least one of: velocity of the fluid and speed of sound of the fluid.

14. The apparatus of claim 1 wherein the at least two pressure sensors are selected from a group consisting of: piezoelectric, piezoresistive, strain gauge, PVDF, optical sensors, ported ac pressure sensors, accelerometers, velocity sensors, and displacement sensors.

15. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the at least two pressure sensors are wrapped around at least a portion of the pipe and do not contact the fluid.

16. The apparatus of claim 1 , wherein the signal processor is further configured to

compare the quality metric to a threshold value; and

determine the parameter of the fluid using the slope of the at least one ridge in response to the quality metric reaching the threshold value.

17. A method for determining a quality metric of a measurement of a parameter of a fluid flowing through a pipe, the measurement being made using a spatial array of at least two sensors disposed at different axial locations along the pipe, each of the sensors providing a signal indicative of unsteady pressure within the pipe at a corresponding axial location of the pipe, the method comprising:

constructing from the signals at least a portion of a k-ω plot, where the k-ω plot is indicative of a dispersion relation for the unsteady pressure within the pipe;

detecting at least one ridge in the k-ω plot, a slope of the at least one ridge being indicative of the parameter of the fluid;

comparing an accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge with an accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along at least one ray extending in the k-ω plot to determine a quality metric indicative of a quality of the at least one ridge.

18. The method of claim 17 , wherein the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge is a sum of the powers associated with the k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge.

19. The method of claim 17 , wherein the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray is a sum of the powers associated with the k-ω pairs along the at least one ray.

20. The method of claim 17 , wherein the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray is an average accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along a plurality of rays.

21. The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least one ray has a slope indicative of a reference velocity.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the reference velocity is determined as a function of the best velocity.

23. The method of claim 21 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the reference velocity is independent of the best velocity.

24. The method of claim 21 , further comprising:

determining accumulated energies for a plurality of rays in the k-ω plot, the slopes of the plurality of rays indicating a plurality of trial velocities, and

selecting the reference velocity from the trial velocities by comparing the accumulated energies for the plurality of rays.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the trial velocities include: a trial velocity determined as a function of the best velocity and a trial velocity independent of the best velocity.

26. The method of claim 24 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the quality metric is determined using:

Q

=

P

BEST

VELOCITY

-

P

REFERNCE

P

BEST

VELOCITY

+

P

REFERNCE

where P best velocity is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge in a linear scale, P reference is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray in a linear scale, and Q is the quality metric.

27. The method of claim 17 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the quality metric is determined using:

Q

=

P

BEST

VELOCITY

-

P

REFERNCE

P

BEST

VELOCITY

+

P

REFERNCE

where P best velocity is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge in a linear scale, P reference is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray in a linear scale, and Q is the quality metric.

28. The method of claim 17 , wherein the parameter of the fluid includes at least one of: velocity of the fluid and speed of sound of the fluid.

29. The method of claim 17 , wherein the at least one ridge includes a first acoustic ridge in a left plane of the k-ω plot and a second acoustic ridge in the right plane of the k-ω plot, and the method further comprises:

summing the powers associated with the k-ω pairs along the first and second acoustic ridges to determine the accumulated energy for the at least one ridge.

30. The method of claim 17 , further comprising:

comparing the quality metric to a threshold value, and

determining the parameter of the fluid using the slope of the at least one ridge in response to the quality metric reaching the threshold value.

31. A computer storage medium encoded with machine-readable computer program code for measuring a parameter of a fluid passing through a pipe using a spatial array of at least two sensors disposed at different axial locations along the pipe, each of the pressure sensors providing a time-domain signal indicative of unsteady pressure within the pipe at a corresponding axial location of the pipe, the storage medium including instructions for causing a computer to implement a method, when executed by a computer processor comprising:

constructing from the signals at least a portion of a k-ω plot, where the k-ω plot is indicative of a dispersion relation for the unsteady pressure within the pipe,

detecting at least one ridge in the k-ω plot, a slope of the at least one ridge being indicative of the parameter of the fluid,

comparing an accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge with an accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along at least one ray extending in the k-ω plot to determine a quality metric indicative of a quality of the at least one ridge.

32. The storage medium of claim 31 , wherein the at least one ray has a slope indicative of a reference velocity, and the method further comprises:

determining accumulated energies for a plurality of rays in the k-ω plot, the slopes of the plurality of rays indicating a plurality of trial velocities, and

selecting the reference velocity from the trial velocities by comparing the accumulated energies for the plurality of rays.

33. The storage medium of claim 32 , wherein the slope of the at least one ridge is indicative of a best velocity, and the quality metric is determined using:

Q

=

P

BEST

VELOCITY

-

P

REFERNCE

P

BEST

VELOCITY

+

P

REFERNCE

where P best velocity is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ridge in a linear scale, P reference is the accumulated energy for k-ω pairs along the at least one ray in a linear scale, and Q is the quality metric.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 7, 2018
From: HSBC CORPORATE TRUSTEE COMPANY (UK) LIMITED, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: EXPRO METERS, INC.
Reel/Frame 045271/0842 →
RELEASE AND REASSIGNMENT OF PATENTS Recorded Sep 29, 2017
From: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CIDRA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 044097/0723 →
PATENT COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AND SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 8, 2015
From: CIDRA CORPORATE SERVICES, INC.
To: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 036818/0469 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 4, 2014
From: EXPRO METERS, INC.
To: HSBC CORPORATE TRUSTEE COMPANY (UK) LIMITED, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 033687/0078 →