IP Library Patent Application 11688160
Patent Application
App. No. 11/688,160

Method for Detecting and Preventing Fraudulent Internet Advertising Activity

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/688,160
Abstract

A method for preventing fraud in Internet-based advertising. The first step of this method is providing behavior-tracking software on a user computer. That software tracks and analyzes the user's activity across multiple content providers. Next, the system displays content, including advertising, based on preferences inferred from previous activity. Finally, the system identifies behavior patterns consistent with fraudulent activity.

Claims (46)

1 . A method for detecting and preventing fraud in Internet-based advertising, comprising the steps of:

tracking and analyzing multiple users Internet navigation activity across multiple content providers;

collecting data regarding the activity, including at least identification of visited websites, time identifications and action identifications;

analyzing the data to determine visited locations or actions likely associated with fraudulent activity; and

identifying behavior patterns in the user activity data consistent with fraudulent advertising activity.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the analyzing step includes the step of analyzing URL's of visited sites.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the identifying step includes applying results of past analysis to identify current activity patterns.

4 . A method for detecting and preventing fraud in internet-based advertising, comprising the steps of:

providing Internet advertising content to users, including a specific identification for specific instances of advertising content;

tracking and analyzing multiple users Internet navigation activity across multiple content providers;

collecting data regarding the activity, including at least identification of visited websites, time identifications, advertising identifications, machine identifications and action identifications;

analyzing the data to determine visited locations or actions likely associated with fraudulent activity, including associations between machine identifications and advertising identifications; and

identifying behavior patterns in the user activity data consistent with fraudulent advertising activity.

5 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the tracking and analyzing step further includes setting a flag when receiving a click action regarding a specific advertising instance is associated with a specific machine identification and thereafter accepting as valid no further click actions associated with that machine/advertising identification pair, thereby defeating any attempts at fraudulent activity regarding that advertising instance.

6 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the analyzing step includes the step of analyzing URL's of visited sites.

7 . The method of claim 4 , wherein the identifying step includes applying results of past analysis to identify current activity patterns.

8 . A method for detecting and preventing fraud in internet-based advertising, comprising the steps of:

providing Internet advertising content to users, including a specific identification for specific instances of advertising content, including;

tracking and analyzing multiple users Internet navigation activity across multiple content providers, including setting a flag when receiving a click action regarding a specific advertising instance is associated with a specific machine identification and thereafter accepting as valid no further click actions associated with that machine/advertising identification pair, thereby defeating any attempts at fraudulent activity regarding that advertising instance.

9 . A method for identifying the occurrence of fraud regarding a set of internet advertisements, comprising the steps of:

establishing a system employing fraud-resistant advertising platforms;

collecting data from the system, in a volume sufficient to provide statistical validity;

analyzing system data to identify patterns of fraudulent activity;

accepting a test data set reflecting internet advertising responses collected by an independent advertising publisher;

comparing test data to community data, to determine whether test data was likely to have suffered click-through inflation fraud; and

whether test data was likely to have suffered competitive click-though attack.

10 . The method of claim 9 , wherein the comparing step includes applying rules and results derived from past analysis to the test data.

11 . A method for monitoring possible fraudulent activity within a computer system:

providing a monitor system;

scanning system to identify elements having known association with fraudulent activity;

monitoring system activity to identify activity patterns associated with fraudulent activity; and

notifying user of possible fraudulent activity.

12 . The method of claim 11 , wherein the scanning and monitoring steps include comparing current system contents and activity to rules received from a central monitoring system.

13 . A method for identifying phishing threats in an individual computer system, comprising the steps of

scanning the headers of incoming emails to identify domains associated with phishing sites;

scanning incoming email messages for hyperlinks;

testing the hyperlinks, including the steps of

determining whether the hyperlink landing site is associated with phishing activities;

classifying undetermined sites to identify the content of the landing page and associated sites.

14 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the determining step includes comparing the site identified in the hyperlink under test with known sites associated with phishing activity.

15 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the classifying step further includes notifying the user of the results of the step.

16 . The method of claim 13 , wherein the classifying step further includes analyzing the content of the landing page and associated sites to determine the legitimacy of the.

17 . A method for preventing fraudulent responses to Internet advertising, comprising the steps of:

presenting an advertisement to an internet user;

collecting response information from users exercising affirmative responses to the advertising, including collecting at least a substantive user response and a user identification code;

accepting the response information only if the collected information is the first response to the advertising presented material from the identified user.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2012
From: CLARIA INNOVATIONS, LLC
To: CARHAMM LTD., LLC
Reel/Frame 027708/0319 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 1, 2010
From: JELLYCLOUD (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
To: CLARIA INNOVATIONS, LLC
Reel/Frame 024927/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 31, 2010
From: JELLYCLOUD, INC.
To: JELLYCLOUD (ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITORS), LLC
Reel/Frame 024915/0414 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 30, 2010
From: CLARIA CORPORATION
To: JELLYCLOUD, INC.
Reel/Frame 024906/0826 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 15, 2007
From: GRAY, RICHARD J., MR.; BENNETT, DOMINIC V., MR.
To: CLARIA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019433/0151 →