IP Library Granted Patent US 8,078,531
Granted Patent B2
US 8,078,531 · App. 11/740,143 · Granted Dec 13, 2011

Auditing or determining reductions to card-issuer interchange fees

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,078,531
App. No.
11/740,143
Granted
Dec 13, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

This document describes tools capable of auditing and/or determining reductions to card-issuer interchange fees charged for credit-card transactions. The tools may do so automatically and with user interaction for thousands or even millions of transactions.

Claims (16)

1. At least one computer-readable storage media device having computer-readable instructions therein that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to perform acts comprising:

receiving a plurality of merchant identifiers for a plurality of merchants, each of the merchant identifiers identifying a merchant of the plurality of merchants and at least some of the merchant identifiers being associated with different merchants of the plurality of merchants, each of the plurality of merchants receiving credit-card purchases;

batching the credit card purchases for the plurality of merchants, the plurality of merchants being associated with a client via each of their respective merchant identifiers;

retrieving, automatically, without user interaction, from a relational database, and using the merchant identifiers, credit-card transaction data for the credit-card purchases for the plurality of merchants, the credit-card transaction data indicating card-issuer interchange fees charged to each merchant of the plurality of merchants and a dollar volume of credit-card purchases on which the card-issuer interchange fees charged are assessed for each merchant of the plurality of merchants;

calculating a first card-issuer interchange rate that the client was charged based on the card-issuer interchange fees charged to each merchant of the plurality of merchants, or the card-issuer interchange fees charged to each merchant of the plurality of merchants and the dollar volume of credit-card purchases on which the card-issuer interchange fees charged are assessed for each merchant of the plurality of merchants, respectively;

determining whether or not an interchange category assigned for one or more of the credit-card purchases is correct by:

receiving published interchange categories and published interchange parameters for the published interchange categories, the published interchange categories and the published interchange parameters being for a time-period at which the one or more of the credit-card purchases were transacted or batched;

determining transaction status parameters that were used to assign the one or more of the credit card purchases to an assigned interchange category;

matching the transaction status parameters to corresponding published interchange category parameters;

determining one of the published interchange categories that includes the corresponding published interchange parameters; and

determining that the one of the published interchange categories does not match the assigned interchange category;

calculating for the one or more of the credit card purchases a second card-issuer interchange rate that the client would have been charged if a correct interchange category had been assigned to the one or more of the credit card purchases; and

determining, for respective credit card purchases of the one or more of the credit card purchases, a savings or loss between the first card-issuer interchange rate and the second card-issuer interchange rate.

2. The at least one storage media device of claim 1 , wherein the act of retrieving the credit-card transaction data retrieves the credit-card transaction data using an Extract portion of an Extract, Transform, and Load (ETL) process, the act of calculating uses a Transform portion of the ETL process, and the act of providing uses a Load portion of the ETL process.

3. The at least one storage media device of claim 1 , wherein the credit-card transaction data comprises information about each of the credit-card purchases received by the plurality of merchants.

4. The at least one storage media device of claim 1 , wherein the credit-card purchases are transacted with branded credit cards and processed through one or more credit card networks associated with the branded credit cards.

Assignments (12)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 26, 2019
From: VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: REDBRIDGE USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 048700/0861 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 31, 2014
From: VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
Reel/Frame 034082/0539 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 5, 2014
From: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
To: VIZANT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 033473/0603 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 1, 2011
From: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
To: FOX CHASE BANK
Reel/Frame 026843/0855 →
THE LEGAL DOCUMENT FILED WITH THE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ASSIGNMENT AT REEL/FRAME 025230/0195 INCORRECTLY STATED THAT THE ASSIGNEE (PE SYSTEMS, LLC) WAS A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Recorded Jan 4, 2011
From: WA2.INC
To: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 025665/0408 →
THE LEGAL DOCUMENT FILED WITH PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ASSIGNMENT AT REEL/FRAME 025230/0161 INCORRECTLY STATED THAT THE ASSIGNEE(PE SYSTEMS, LLLC) WAS A CORPORATION OF THE STATE OF WASHINGTON WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY A LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE. Recorded Jan 4, 2011
From: WA2. INC.
To: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 025665/0387 →
CORRECTED ASSIGNMENT Recorded Jan 4, 2011
From: WA2.INC
To: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 025611/0067 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 24, 2010
From: WA2.INC
To: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 025311/0260 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Nov 1, 2010
From: P.E. SYSTEMS, INC.
To: WA2, INC.
Reel/Frame 025238/0636 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 1, 2010
From: WA2.INC
To: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 025230/0161 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 29, 2007
From: PE SYSTEMS, LLC
To: SOVEREIGN BANK
Reel/Frame 020051/0589 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 27, 2007
From: MCELROY, ALAN WAYNE; PARRISH, THOMAS P.; BIRR, KELLY
To: PE SYSTEMS INC.
Reel/Frame 019635/0667 →