IP Library Granted Patent US 7,856,868
Granted Patent B2
US 7,856,868 · App. 11/750,010 · Granted Dec 28, 2010

Method and system for determining the feasibility of an automotive exhaust catalyst

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,856,868
App. No.
11/750,010
Granted
Dec 28, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

This technology provides methods and systems for catalyst feasibility analysis and the optimal determination of automotive catalyst specifications utilizing, but not limited to, light-off performance, air-to-fuel ratio tolerance, and steady state emissions performance catalyst criteria. This technology additionally provides a catalyst feasibility index algorithm that includes various catalyst criteria inputs and provides for weighting factors to independently value each catalyst input. The technology further provides for the optimal determination of automotive catalyst specifications in order to reduce vehicle toxic exhaust emissions such as hydrocarbons (HC) and oxides of nitrogen (NO x ).

Claims (84)

1. A method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications, the method comprising:

utilizing a catalyst feasibility index algorithm to select an automotive exhaust catalyst;

inputting into the catalyst feasibility index algorithm a plurality of values, each value indicative of an automotive exhaust catalyst criterion;

obtaining a resultant catalyst feasibility index summary value, wherein the value is a single number;

comparing the resultant catalyst feasibility index summary value with those of other tests conducted on other catalysts; and

selecting a catalyst based upon the comparison of resultant catalyst feasibility index value with other catalysts.

2. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise: light-off performance, air-to-fuel ratio tolerance, and steady state emissions performance catalyst criteria.

3. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise:

the market cost of a precious metal utilized in a catalyst.

4. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise:

a value representing the structure of the catalyst; and

a value representing the washcoat of the catalyst.

5. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 1 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise:

a value representing a time measurement to catalyst breakthrough; and

wherein the method further comprises:

utilizing a square wave feed gas input for measuring to time to catalyst breakthrough.

6. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 1 , the method further comprising:

utilizing the following relationship:

CFI XX =( AFR 90 ×CPK ss — avg — xx )/ LO 70 — XX

wherein CFI is the catalyst feasibility index, XX is a toxic automotive exhaust emission, AFR 90 is the stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio tolerance window with a 90% efficiency for the toxic automotive exhaust emission, CPK ss — avg — xx is the statistical capability (Cpk) value for the toxic automotive exhaust emission;

wherein the Cpk utilizes the following relationship:

Cpk =(Mean Efficiency−90%)/(3 σ efficiency ); and

wherein LO 70 — XX is light-off performance at the temperature to reach 70% efficiency for the toxic automotive exhaust emission.

7. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 6 , wherein XX represents hydrocarbons, the method further comprising:

utilizing the following relationship:

CFI HC =( AFR 90 ×CPK ss — avg — HC )/ LO 70 — HC.

8. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 6 , wherein XX represents oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), the method further comprising:

utilizing the following relationship:

CFI NOx =( AFR 90 ×CPK ss — avg — NOx )/ LO 70 — NOx.

9. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 6 , wherein the catalyst feasibility index further comprises a plurality of weighting factors and wherein the method further comprises:

utilizing the follow relationships:

CFI HC =[(1+α1)×( AFR 90 )×(1+α2)× CPK ss — avg — HC )]/[(1−α3)×( LO 70 — HC )], and

CFI NOx =[(1+α1)×( AFR 90 )×(1+α4)×( CPK ss — avg — NOx )]/[(1−α5)× LO 70 — NOx )];

wherein α1 is a stoichiometric window weighting factor;

wherein α2 is a hydrocarbon (HC) steady state efficiency weighting factor;

wherein α3 is a hydrocarbon (HC) light-off performance weighting factor;

wherein α4 is an oxide of nitrogen (NO x ) steady state efficiency weighting factor; and

wherein α5 is an oxide of nitrogen (NO x ) light-off performance weighting factor.

10. The method for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 9 , farther comprising:

averaging the catalyst feasibility index for hydrocarbons, CFI HC , with the catalyst feasibility index for oxides of nitrogen, CFI NOx ; and

utilizing the following relationship to obtain an average catalyst feasibility index value:

CFI AVG =AVERAGE( CFI HC ,CFI NOx ).

11. A computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications, the programming configured to:

utilize a catalyst feasibility index algorithm to select an automotive exhaust catalyst;

input into the catalyst feasibility index algorithm a plurality of values, each value indicative of an automotive exhaust catalyst criterion;

obtain a resultant catalyst feasibility index summary value, wherein the value is a single number;

compare the resultant catalyst feasibility index summary value with those of other tests conducted on other catalysts; and

select a catalyst based upon the comparison of resultant catalyst feasibility index value with other catalysts.

12. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise: light-off performance, air-to-fuel ratio tolerance, and steady state emissions performance catalyst criteria.

13. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise:

the market cost of a precious metal utilized in a catalyst.

14. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise:

a value representing the structure of the catalyst; and

a value representing the washcoat of the catalyst.

15. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 11 , wherein the plurality of values that are input into the feasibility index comprise:

a value representing a time, measurement to catalyst breakthrough; and

wherein the programming is further configured to:

utilize a square wave feed gas input for measuring to time to catalyst breakthrough.

16. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 11 , the programming is further configured to:

utilize the following relationship:

CFI XX =( AFR 90 ×CPK ss — avg — xx )/ LO 70 — XX

wherein CFI is the catalyst feasibility index, XX is a toxic automotive exhaust emission, AFR 90 is the stoichiometric air-to-fuel ratio tolerance window with a 90% efficiency for the toxic automotive exhaust emission, CPK ss — avg — xx is the statistical capability (Cpk) value for the toxic automotive exhaust emission;

wherein the Cpk utilizes the following relationship:

Cpk =(Mean Efficiency−90%)/(3 σ efficiency ); and

wherein LO 70 — XX is light-off performance at the temperature to reach 70% efficiency for the toxic automotive exhaust emission.

17. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 16 , wherein XX represents hydrocarbons, and the programming is further configured to:

utilize the following relationship:

CFI HC =( AFR 90 ×CPK ss — avg — HC )/ LO 70 — HC.

18. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 16 , wherein XX represents oxides of nitrogen (NO x ), and the programming is further configured to:

utilize the following relationship:

CFI NOx =( AFR 90 ×CPK ss — avg — NOx )/ LO 70 — NOx.

19. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 16 , wherein the catalyst feasibility index further comprises a plurality of weighting factors and wherein the programming is further configured to:

utilize the follow relationships:

CFI HC =[(1+α1)×( AFR 90 )×(1+α2)× CPK ss — avg — HC )]/[(1−α3)×( LO 70 — HC )], and

CFI NOx =[(1+α1)×( AFR 90 )×(1+α4)×( CPK ss — avg — NOx )]/[(1−α5)× LO 70 — NOx )];

wherein α1 is a stoichiometric window weighting factor;

wherein α2 is a hydrocarbon (HC) steady state efficiency weighting factor;

wherein α3 is a hydrocarbon (HC) light-off performance weighting factor;

wherein α4 is an oxide of nitrogen (NO x ) steady state efficiency weighting factor; and

wherein α5 is an oxide of nitrogen (NO x ) light-off performance weighting factor.

20. The computer readable medium encoded with programming for determining the feasibility of a particular automotive exhaust catalyst and the associated optimal automotive catalyst specifications of claim 19 , the programming is further configured to:

average the catalyst feasibility index for hydrocarbons, CFI HC , with the catalyst feasibility index for oxides of nitrogen, CFI NOx ; and

utilize the following relationship to obtain an average catalyst feasibility index value:

CFI AVG =AVERAGE( CFI HC ,CFI NOx ).

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 24, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: FCA US LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRYSLER GROUP LLC)
Reel/Frame 048177/0356 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST RELEASING SECOND-LIEN SECURITY INTEREST PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL 026426 AND FRAME 0644, REEL 026435 AND FRAME 0652, AND REEL 032384 AND FRAME 0591 Recorded Feb 11, 2016
From: CITIBANK, N.A.
To: FCA US LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
Reel/Frame 037784/0001 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 30, 2015
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: FCA US LLC
Reel/Frame 035553/0356 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 4, 2014
From: CHRYSLER GROUP LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 032384/0640 →