IP Library Patent Application 11759312
Patent Application
App. No. 11/759,312

Systems and Methods for Selecting a Material That Best Matches a Desired Set of Properties

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/759,312
Abstract

Disclosed herein is a method for selecting a material that most closely matches a desired set of properties, the method comprising: obtaining at least one input parameter from a user; retrieving actual property values for at least one preliminary matching material from a global data repository; determining a match between each preliminary matching material matches and a desired set of property values; and outputting the results to the user.

Claims (242)

1 . A method for selecting a material that most closely matches a desired set of properties, the method comprising:

obtaining at least one input parameter from a user;

retrieving actual property values for at least one preliminary matching material from a global data repository;

determining a match between each preliminary matching material matches and a desired set of property values; and

outputting the results to the user.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the determining step comprises:

calculating an index value for each actual property value of each preliminary matching material;

scoring each property value to create a scored property value;

weighting each scored property value by talking a priority value for each property into account to create a weighted scored property value; and

calculating an overall match score for each preliminary matching material.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a minimum acceptable property value or a maximum acceptable property value for a property, the index value is calculated using the formula:

Index

value

=

Actual

property

value

Desired

property

value

4 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a range of acceptable property values for a property, the index value is calculated using the formula:

Index

value

range

=

Actual

property

value

-

(

LOW

+

HIGH

)

/

2

HIGH

-

LOW

wherein LOW is the minimum value of the acceptable range and HIGH is the maximum value of the acceptable range.

5 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a minimum acceptable property value for a property, the scored property value is calculated using the fuzzy membership function:

Scored

property

value

=

1

1

+

exp

[

-

Slope

(

Index

value

-

Crossover

)

]

wherein Slope=15 and Crossover=0.95.

6 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a maximum acceptable property value for a property, the scored property value is calculated using the fuzzy membership function:

Scored

property

value

=

1

1

+

exp

[

-

Slope

(

Index

value

-

Crossover

)

]

wherein Slope=−15 and Crossover=1.05.

7 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and the desired property value for that property equals zero (0), the scored property value is one (1).

8 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and the desired property value for that property does not equal zero (0), the scored property value is zero (0).

9 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and:

Actual property value<DPV*0.9

wherein DPV=desired property value, the scored property value is zero (0).

10 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and:

DPV*0.9.ltoreq.Actual property value<DPV

the scored property value is calculated using the fuzzy membership function:

Scored

Property

Value

=

(

DPV

*

0.1

)

-

DPV

+

APV

(

DPV

*

0.1

)

wherein DPV=desired property value and APV=actual property value.

11 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and:

Actual property value=DPV

wherein DPV=desired property value, the scored property value is one (1).

12 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and:

DPV<Actual property value.ltoreq.DPV* 1.1

the scored property value is calculated using the fuzzy membership function:

Scored

Property

Value

=

(

DPV

*

0.1

)

+

DPV

-

APV

(

DPV

*

0.1

)

wherein DPV=desired property value and APV=actual property value.

13 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is an acceptable point value for a property, and:

Actual property value>DPV* 1.1

wherein DPV=desired property value, the scored property value is zero (0).

14 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a range of acceptable property values for a property, and the index value for that property is less than −1, the scored property value equals zero (0).

15 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a range of acceptable property values for a property, and:

−1.ltoreq.Index value<−0.5

the scored property value is calculated using the fuzzy membership function:

Scored property value=2(1.0+Index value).

16 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a range of acceptable property values for a property, and:

−0.5.ltoreq.Index value<0.5

the scored property value is one (1).

17 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a range of acceptable property values for a property, and:

0.5.ltoreq.Index value<1

the scored property is calculated using the fuzzy membership function:

Scored property value=2(1.0-Index value).

18 . The method of claim 2 , wherein at least one input parameter obtained from the user is a range of acceptable property values for a property, and the index value for that property is greater than one (1), the scored property value is zero (0).

19 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the weighted scored property value is calculated using the formula:

Weighted scored property value=Scored property value * Priority value

20 . The method of claim 19 , wherein a high priority exists for a property, a priority value of 4 is assigned to that property, a medium priority exists for a property, a priority value of 2 is assigned to that property, and a low priority exists for a property, a priority value of 1 is assigned to that property.

21 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the overall match score is calculated using the formula:

Overall

Match

Score

=

Sum

of

all

weighted

score

property

values

S

um

of

all

priority

values

22 . The method of claim 2 , wherein each preliminary matching material comprises an engineering thermoplastic.

23 . A system for selecting a material that most closely matches a desired set of properties, the system comprising:

a means for obtaining at least one input parameter from a user;

a means for retrieving actual property values for at least one preliminary matching material from a global data repository;

a material selection algorithm operable for determining a match between each preliminary matching material and a desired set of property values; and

a means for outputting the results to the user.

24 . The system of claim 23 , wherein the material selection algorithm is further operable for:

calculating an index value for each actual property value of each preliminary matching material;

scoring each property value to create a scored property value;

weighting each scored property value by taking a priority value for each property into account to create a weighted scored property value; and

calculating an overall match score for each preliminary matching material.

Assignments (2)
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 18, 2008
From: SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS IP B.V.
To: CITIBANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 021423/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2008
From: GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
To: SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS IP B.V.
Reel/Frame 020985/0551 →