Identifying and reporting differences in network activity data files
View Patent ↗A method of identifying differences between activity data files includes determining a difference between the activity data files. Causal analysis may be performed to identify a cause of the difference. The difference and/or the cause of the difference may be rendered based on a rendering template. Tier pairs between the activity data files may be matched and a user may be queried to confirm the tier pair match. Statistical and/or protocol differences between each of the activity files may be presented. Transactions between each of the activity data files may be matched including comparing the content files in each of the activity data files that account for the transactions. Client side differences between each of the activity data files may be identified. A categorization may be assigned to each of the determined differences. Determined differences may be excluded from the rendering.
1. A method comprising:
matching tier pairs between activity data files, wherein matching tier pairs includes querying a user to confirm the tier pair match;
generating protocol information for each of the activity data files;
determining, by a processor, a difference between the activity data files, wherein determining the difference between the activity data files includes determining a difference between each of the activity data files' protocol information;
performing, by the processor, causal analysis to identify a cause of the difference; and
rendering, by the processor, the difference and the cause of the difference based on a rendering template.
2. The method of claim 1 , including generating statistical information for each of the activity files, wherein determining the difference includes determining a difference between each of the activity data files statistical information.
3. The method of claim 1 , wherein determining the difference includes matching transactions between each of the activity data files.
4. The method of claim 3 , wherein matching transactions includes comparing content of a file that accounts for a transaction in a first one of the activity data files to content of a file that accounts for a transaction in a second one of the activity data files.
5. The method of claim 1 , wherein performing causal analysis includes identifying client side differences between each of the activity data files.
6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the determined difference is a plurality of determined differences and wherein the rendering template includes a categorization that is assigned to each of the plurality of determined differences.
7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the rendering template includes a criterion to identify a difference that is excluded from the rendering.
8. The method of claim 1 , including modifying the template prior to the rendering act.
9. The method of claim 1 , wherein rendering includes rendering the difference with at least two levels of resolution.
10. The method of claim 9 , wherein each of the two levels of resolution are selectable for rendering within a user interface.
11. The method of claim 1 , wherein rendering includes rendering on a display device within a graphical user interface.
12. The method of claim 1 , wherein rendering the difference includes rendering the difference in a hierarchical format.
13. The method of claim 12 , wherein rendering the difference includes rendering a value for each of the activity data files that accounts for the difference.
14. The method of claim 12 , wherein rendering the difference includes rendering transaction details of each of the activity data files and indicating if each of the details are one of matched, moved and unique between the activity data files.
15. The method of claim 13 , including rendering an indicator comparing one of the values to another one of the values.
16. A non-transitory computer readable medium upon which is stored a program that, when executed by a processor, causes the processor to:
matching tier pairs between activity data files, wherein matching tier pairs includes querying a user to confirm the tier pair match;
generating protocol information for each of the activity data files;
determine a difference between the activity data files, wherein determining the difference between the activity data files includes determining a difference between each of the activity data files' protocol information;
perform causal analysis to identify a cause of the difference; and
render the difference and the cause of the difference based on a rendering template.
17. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the program causes the processor to generate statistical information for each of the activity files, and
to determine the difference based on a difference between each of the activity data files statistical information.
18. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the program causes the processor to generate protocol information for each of the activity files, and to determine the difference based on a difference between each of the activity data files protocol information.
19. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the program causes the processor to match transactions between each of the activity data files by comparing content of a file that accounts for a transaction in a first one of the activity data files to content of a file that accounts for a transaction in a second one of the activity data files.
20. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the program causes the processor to perform the causal analysis based on client side differences between each of the activity data files.
21. The medium of claim 16 , wherein the program causes the processor to categorize the difference and render the categorization.