IP Library Granted Patent US 8,568,460
Granted Patent B2
US 8,568,460 · App. 11/790,904 · Granted Oct 29, 2013

Spine distraction implant and method

Inventors: James F. Zucherman (San Francisco, CA); Ken Y. Hsu (San Francisco, CA); T. Wade Fallin (Hyde Park, UT); Henry A. Klyce (Piedmont, CA)
Assignee: Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,568,460
App. No.
11/790,904
Granted
Oct 29, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A spine distraction implant alleviates pain associated with spinal stenosis and facet arthropathy by expanding the volume in the spine canal and/or neural foramen. The implant provides a spinal extension stop while allowing freedom of spinal flexion.

Claims (25)

1. A method, comprising:

inserting a cannula from a lateral side of adjacent spinous processes such that at least a first portion of the cannula fits directly between adjacent spinous processes;

inserting an implant through the cannula from the lateral side while the first portion of the cannula is disposed directly between the adjacent spinous processes such that at least a portion of the implant is disposed between the adjacent spinous processes; wherein the inserting includes pushing the implant through the cannula via an insertion tool while a distal end face of the insertion tool abuts a proximal end portion of the implant;

removing the cannula after the inserting the implant such that at least a portion of the implant remains disposed between the adjacent spinous processes; and wherein the implant is configured to limit extension of a spinal column including the adjacent spinous processes and configured to allow flexion of the spinal column.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the implant has a plurality of indentations configured to position the implant relative to the adjacent spinous processes.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cannula defines a longitudinally curved path between an incision in skin laterally spaced from the spine and a space between the adjacent spinous processes.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the cannula is a first cannula from a plurality of cannulas, the method further comprising:

inserting a second cannula from the plurality of cannulas from a lateral side of adjacent spinous processes such that at least a first portion of the cannula is disposed directly between adjacent spinous processes;

wherein the inserting the first cannula comprises inserting the first cannula over the second cannula;

the second cannula having a cross-sectional size smaller than a cross-sectional size of the first cannula.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the inserting includes inserting the implant such that at least the portion of the implant is disposed within a space between the adjacent spinous processes, the space bounded by a first spinous process, a second spinous process adjacent the first spinous process, and a supraspinous ligament coupled to the adjacent spinous processes.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the implant has a rib that substantially circumscribes an outer surface of the implant, the rib configured to indicate a position of the implant relative to the adjacent spinous processes.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein a shape of the implant substantially corresponds to a shape of the cannula.

8. A method of inserting a spinal implant, comprising:

inserting a cannula from a lateral side of adjacent spinous processes such that a distal opening of the cannula is disposed adjacent to and facing an interspinous space directly between adjacent spinous processes; the opening being smaller than the interspinous space;

inserting an implant through the cannula from the lateral side while the distal opening is disposed adjacent to and facing the interspinous space such that at least a portion of the implant is disposed between the adjacent spinous processes; wherein the inserting includes pushing the implant through the cannula via an insertion tool while a distal end face of the insertion tool abuts a proximal end portion of the implant;

removing the cannula after the inserting the implant such that at least a portion of the implant remains disposed between the adjacent spinous processes; and wherein the implant is configured to limit extension of a spinal column including the adjacent spinous processes and configured to allow flexion of the spinal column.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the implant has a plurality of indentations configured to position the implant relative to the adjacent spinous processes.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein the cannula defines a longitudinally curved path between an incision in skin laterally spaced from the spine and the interspinous space.

11. The method of claim 8 wherein the cannula is a first cannula from a plurality of cannulas, the method further comprising:

inserting a second cannula from the plurality of cannulas from a lateral side of adjacent spinous processes such that a distal opening of the second cannula is disposed adjacent to and facing the interspinous space;

wherein the inserting the first cannula comprises inserting the first cannula over the second cannula;

the second cannula having a cross-sectional size smaller than a cross-sectional size of the first cannula.

12. The method of claim 8 wherein the implant has a rib that substantially circumscribes an outer surface of the implant, the rib configured to indicate a position of the implant relative to the adjacent spinous processes.

13. The method of claim 8 wherein a shape of the implant substantially corresponds to a shape of the cannula.

Assignments (8)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2008
From: MEDTRONIC SPINE LLC
To: KYPHON SARL
Reel/Frame 021070/0278 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 9, 2008
From: KYPHON INC
To: MEDTRONIC SPINE LLC
Reel/Frame 020993/0042 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 21, 2008
From: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: KYPHON INC.
Reel/Frame 020393/0260 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2007
From: ZUCHERMAN, JAMES F.; HSU, KEN Y.; WINSLOW, CHARLES J.; KLYCE, HENRY A.
To: SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 019463/0237 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2007
From: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 019463/0265 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2007
From: SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: ST. FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 019464/0592 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2007
From: ZUCHERMAN, JAMES F.; HSU, KEN Y.
To: SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 019463/0232 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2007
From: ZUCHERMAN, JAMES F.; HSU, KEN Y.; FALLIN, T. WADE
To: SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 019463/0222 →
Continuity (7)
Continuation 10732589 · Dec 10, 2003
Division 09842756 · Apr 26, 2001
Continuation 09474038 · Dec 28, 1999
Continuation 09175645 · Oct 20, 1998
Continuation In Part 08958281 · Oct 27, 1997
Continuation In Part 08778093 · Jan 2, 1997
Related Publication 20070203501A1 · Aug 30, 2007