IP Library Granted Patent US 8,026,844
Granted Patent B2
US 8,026,844 · App. 11/811,343 · Granted Sep 27, 2011

Radar visibility model

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,026,844
App. No.
11/811,343
Granted
Sep 27, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining whether a target of interest located within radar resolution cells in a target area of interest is detectable with a radar system from a location and elevation of the radar system is described. The method includes the steps of (a) developing a topographic map of the terrain in the target area of interest; (b) mapping the radar resolution cells onto the topographic map; (c) modeling radar signal propagation to each of the radar resolution cells on the topographic map; and (d) determining, using the results of the modeling, if the radar system has sufficient signal-to-noise (SNR) to detect the target of interest.

Claims (16)

1. A method for determining whether a target of interest located within radar resolution cells in a target area of interest is detectable with a radar system from a location and elevation of said radar system, comprising:

(a) developing a topographic map of the terrain in said target area of interest;

(b) mapping said radar resolution cells onto said topographic map;

(c) modeling radar signal propagation to each of said radar resolution cells on said topographic map; and

(d) determining, using the results of said modeling, if said radar system has sufficient signal-to-noise (SNR) to detect said target of interest.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said radar system is non-coherent.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said radar signal propagation includes effects of multi-path.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said radar signal propagation includes effects of environmental conditions.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said topographic map includes a man-made feature.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein said man-made feature is a building.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said topographic map includes vegetation.

8. The method of claim 7 , wherein said vegetation includes a tree.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein determination of the detectability of said target of interest is used in an algorithm to track said target of interest.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein said radar system does not have sufficient SNR to detect said target of interest in one or more of said radar resolution cells and a track of said target of interest is maintained using said algorithm.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising optimizing said position and elevation of said radar system to maximize the coverage of said radar system.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising optimizing said position and elevation of said radar system to obtain a specific coverage area for said radar system.

Assignments (4)
MERGER Recorded Oct 20, 2022
From: AEROSTAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
To: AEROSTAR INTERNATIONAL, LLC
Reel/Frame 061733/0285 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 19, 2022
From: AEROSTAR TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, INC. (FORMERLY VISTA RESERACH, INC.)
To: AEROSTAR INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Reel/Frame 061284/0537 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2010
From: FOX, PHILIP; MARESCA, JR., JOSEPH; HANCOCK, DENNIS M.; RINO, CHARLES L.
To: VISTA RESEARCH, INC.
Reel/Frame 024597/0625 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 27, 2007
From: FOX, PHILLIP A.; MARESCA, JOSEPH W. JR.
To: VISTA RESEARCH, INC.
Reel/Frame 019901/0847 →