IP Library Patent Application 11847254
Patent Application
App. No. 11/847,254

Engineered Labor Standards ("ELS") Management

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
11/847,254
Abstract

An Engineered Labor Standards (“ELS”) scheduling system prepares preliminary estimates of task durations based on a subset of the conditions affecting task duration, then later prepares adjusted estimates when more information about the conditions becomes available. The actual time a resource spends performing the task is measured, and the estimates and measurements are stored in a database.

Claims (51)

1 . A method comprising:

preparing a preliminary estimate of a task duration based on a subset of a plurality of conditions;

preparing an adjusted estimate of the task duration based on the plurality of conditions;

measuring an actual duration of the task; and

storing the preliminary estimate, the adjusted estimate and the actual duration in a database.

2 . The method of claim 1 wherein the preliminary estimate, the adjusted estimate and the actual duration form an estimate-duration triplet, the method further comprising:

storing a plurality of additional estimate-duration triplets in the database; and

evaluating an accuracy of the preliminary estimate based on an average difference between adjusted estimates and corresponding actual durations.

3 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

preparing a plurality of adjusted estimates, each adjusted estimate corresponding to one of a plurality of resources that could perform the task; and

assigning the task to one of the plurality of resources based on the plurality of adjusted estimates.

4 . The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of conditions includes at least one of a weight of an item, a size of the item, a volume of the item, an aggregation quantity of the item, a packaging type of the item, a material group of the item, a source location or a destination location.

5 . The method of claim 1 wherein the plurality of conditions includes a characteristic of a specific tool used to perform the task.

6 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

collecting a plurality of estimated and actual task performance times of a worker, wherein each of the plurality of estimated task performance times incorporates a condition that cannot be determined until performance of a task commences;

computing a worker efficiency based on a difference between corresponding pairs of estimated and actual performance times; and

adjusting a compensation of the worker according to the worker efficiency.

7 . The method of claim 6 wherein the condition is one of a specific tool used to perform the task, a location of the worker at a beginning of the task or a set of concurrent tasks occurring where the task is to be performed.

8 . A computer-readable medium containing data and instructions to cause a programmable processor to perform operations comprising:

preparing a preliminary estimate of a time required to perform a task;

refining the preliminary estimate based on a condition that was indefinite when the preliminary estimate was prepared, and became definite before the preliminary estimate was refined;

measuring an actual time required to perform the task; and

storing the refined preliminary estimate and the actual time in a database.

9 . The computer-readable medium of claim 8 containing additional data and instructions to cause the programmable processor to perform operations comprising:

scheduling a task to be performed by a resource; and

identifying a plurality of steps of the task; wherein

preparing the preliminary estimate comprises calculating a sum of estimated times to complete each of the plurality of steps.

10 . The computer-readable medium of claim 8 containing additional data and instructions to cause the programmable processor to perform operations comprising:

selecting one of a plurality of resources to perform the task based on a refined preliminary estimate prepared for each of the plurality of resources; and

dispatching the selected one of the plurality of resources to perform the task.

11 . The computer-readable medium of claim 8 wherein the condition is one of a velocity of a resource to perform the task, a worker who is to perform the task, or an interference from a concurrent task.

12 . A method comprising:

scheduling a task to be performed by an undetermined resource of a plurality of resources;

computing an estimated time for a hypothetical resource to complete the task, the estimated time computation omitting a unique characteristic of the undetermined resource and a situational characteristic of the undetermined resource;

computing an adjusted estimated time for a selected resource of the plurality of resources to complete the task, the adjusted estimated time computation including a unique characteristic of the selected resource and a situational characteristic of the selected resource;

assigning the task to the selected resource; and

measuring an actual time required for the selected resource to complete the task.

13 . The method of claim 12 wherein the unique characteristic of the selected resource is a speed of the selected resource.

14 . The method of claim 12 wherein the situational characteristic of the selected resource is a location of the selected resource before beginning the task.

15 . The method of claim 12 , further comprising:

computing an adjusted estimated time for each resource of the plurality of resources to complete the task, each adjusted estimated time computation including a unique characteristic of the corresponding resource and a situational characteristic of the corresponding resource.

16 . An Engineered Labor Standards (“ELS”) scheduling system comprising:

a plurality of scheduled tasks;

a plurality of resources to execute the scheduled tasks; and

task estimation logic to estimate a time required to execute a task, wherein

the task estimation logic is to produce a preliminary estimate based on partial information before the task is to be executed; and

the task estimation logic is to produce an adjusted estimate based on complete information when the task is to be executed.

17 . The ELS scheduling system of claim 16 , further comprising:

task assignment logic to assign the task to one of the plurality of resources based on a plurality of adjusted estimates, wherein each of the plurality of adjusted estimates indicates an approximate time for a corresponding one of the plurality of resources to perform the task.

18 . The ELS scheduling system of claim 17 wherein the task assignment logic is to select a best resource of the plurality of resources to perform the task.

19 . The ELS scheduling system of claim 17 wherein the task assignment logic is to select a best task of the plurality of scheduled tasks to be assigned to a resource.

Assignments (2)
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 26, 2014
From: SAP AG
To: SAP SE
Reel/Frame 033625/0223 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 30, 2007
From: MUELLER, JUERGEN; REINHARDT, CHRISTIAN; PUCHTA, MARKUS; JANHOEFER, ULRIKE; SABELFELD, WASSILLI
To: SAP AG
Reel/Frame 019775/0844 →