IP Library Granted Patent US 7,631,563
Granted Patent B2
US 7,631,563 · App. 11/850,405 · Granted Dec 15, 2009

Method and system for evaluating rod breakout based on tong pressure data

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,631,563
App. No.
11/850,405
Granted
Dec 15, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for evaluating rod quality and wellbore dynamics includes receiving information about the rod size and tong type for a rod pulling operation. Expected breakout pressures can be determined based on the rod size and/or tong type and can be input into an evaluation system. Upper and lower limits for acceptable rod breakout pressures can be calculated based on the expected breakout pressure and/or rod size. Actual rod breakout pressures can be evaluated while pulling rods from a well and compared to the upper and lower limits. Rod breakout pressures below the lower limit or above the upper limit can generate an alarm notifying a rig operator to evaluate the condition of the rod to determine if the rod can be reused. The rod breakout pressures can be recorded as breakout pressure data for further evaluation, including determinations of improper rod make-up and poor well conditions.

Claims (90)

1. A method of evaluating pipe quality based on breakout characteristics as a pipe string is removed from a well, comprising the steps of:

accepting an expected breakout pressure;

accepting an upper limit breakout pressure;

evaluating an actual breakout pressure during a breakout procedure on a pipe in the pipe string; and

evaluating the quality of at least a portion of the pipe based on breakout characteristics at least by determining if the actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the step of generating an alarm if the actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

accepting a pipe size representing the size of the pipe to be broken out during the breakout procedure; and

determining the expected breakout pressure based on at least the pipe size.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

evaluating a position of a block, wherein the block assists in raising the pipe string from the well;

determining if the position of the block comprises a breakout position; determining a peak actual breakout pressure while the block is in the breakout position and the block is not moving in a vertical direction; and

determining if the peak actual breakout pressure is greater than the upper limit breakout pressure.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

recording the actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the pipe string; and

determining an average actual breakout pressure.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

recording the actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the pipe string; and

determining a number of actual breakout pressures above the upper limit breakout pressure.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

recording the actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the pipe string; and

determining a number of pipe in the pipe string, wherein the determination of the number of pipe is based on a determination of a number of breakout procedures for the pipe string.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the upper limit breakout pressure is a predetermined percentage of the expected breakout pressure.

9. A computer-readable medium comprising computer-executable instructions for performing the steps required in claim 1 .

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

recording the actual breakout pressure as breakout data;

generating a signal to evaluate the pipe based on a positive determination that the actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure;

examining the pipe to determine if the pipe can be reused in the well; and examining the breakout data to determine a cause of the actual breakout pressure being above the upper limit breakout pressure.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

evaluating the breakout data;

determining if a predetermined percentage of the breakout data is above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal that the pipe in the pipe string was made-up into the string at a make-up pressure above the expected breakout pressure.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

evaluating the breakout data;

determining if a predetermined percentage of a predetermined sequential number of actual breakout pressures are below the upper limit breakout pressure;

determining if another predetermined percentage of another predetermined sequential number of actual breakout pressures are above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal that an area of the well corresponding to a location of a plurality of pipe comprising the other sequential number of actual breakout pressures above the upper limit breakout pressure should be evaluated.

13. A method of evaluating pipe quality based on breakout characteristics as a pipe string is removed from a well, comprising the steps of:

accepting an expected breakout pressure;

accepting an upper limit breakout pressure;

accepting a lower limit breakout pressure;

determining a peak of an actual breakout pressure during a breakout procedure on a pipe in the pipe string;

evaluating the quality of at least a portion of the pipe based on breakout characteristics at least by determining if the peak actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure or below the lower limit breakout pressure; and

generating an alarm based on a positive determination that the peak actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure or below the lower limit breakout pressure.

14. The method of claim 13 , further comprising the steps of:

receiving an input comprising the size of the pipe to be broken out during the breakout procedure;

determining the expected breakout pressure based on the input;

determining the upper limit breakout pressure based on the expected breakout pressure; and

determining the lower limit breakout pressure based on the expected breakout pressure.

15. The method of claim 13 , further comprising the steps of:

evaluating a position of a block, wherein the block assists in raising the pipe string from the well;

determining if the position of the block comprises a breakout position; and

determining the peak actual breakout pressure while the block is in the breakout position.

16. The method of claim 13 , further comprising the steps of:

recording the peak actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the pipe string; and

calculating an average peak actual breakout pressure.

17. The method of claim 13 , further comprising the steps of:

recording the peak actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the pipe string;

determining a number of peak actual breakout pressures above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

determining a number of peak actual breakout pressures below the lower limit breakout pressure.

18. The method of claim 13 , further comprising the steps of:

recording breakout data comprising the peak actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the pipe string;

examining the breakout data to determine a cause of the actual breakout pressure being above the upper limit breakout pressure.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

determining if a predetermined percentage of the breakout data is above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal that the pipe in the pipe string was made-up into the pipe string at a make-up pressure above the expected breakout pressure.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

determining if a predetermined percentage of a predetermined sequential number of peak actual breakout pressures are below the upper limit breakout pressure;

determining if another predetermined percentage of another predetermined sequential number of peak actual breakout pressures are above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal that an area of the well corresponding to a location of a plurality of pipe comprising the other sequential number of peak actual breakout pressures above the upper limit breakout pressure should be evaluated.

21. The method of claim 18 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

determining if a predetermined percentage of the peak actual breakout pressures for the pipe string are below the lower limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal to evaluate a pump based on a positive determination that a predetermined percentage of the peak actual breakout pressures for the pipe string are below the lower limit breakout pressure.

22. A method of evaluating rod quality based on breakout characteristics as a string of rods is removed from a well, comprising the steps of:

receiving an input comprising a size of rod to be broken out during the breakout procedure;

determining an upper limit breakout pressure based on the rod size;

determining the lower limit breakout pressure based on the rod size; accepting data comprising a peak of an actual breakout pressure during a breakout procedure on each rod;

determining if the peak actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure or below the lower limit breakout pressure;

generating an alarm based on a positive determination that the peak actual breakout pressure is above the upper limit breakout pressure or below the lower limit breakout pressure; and

evaluating the quality of at least a portion of the rod at least by examining the rod to determine if the pipe can be reused in the well.

23. The method of claim 22 , further comprising the steps of:

recording breakout data comprising the peak actual breakout pressure for a plurality of breakout procedures on the rods;

examining the breakout data to determine a cause of the actual breakout pressure being above the upper limit breakout pressure.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

determining if a predetermined percentage of the breakout data is above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal that the rods were made-up at a make-up pressure above an expected make-up pressure.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein examining the breakout data comprises the steps of:

determining if a predetermined sequential number of peak actual breakout pressures are below the upper limit breakout pressure;

determining if another predetermined sequential number of peak actual breakout pressures are above the upper limit breakout pressure; and

generating a signal that an area of the well corresponding to a location of a plurality of rods comprising the sequential number of peak actual breakout pressures above the upper limit breakout pressure should be evaluated.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 16, 2016
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
To: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 040996/0899 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2016
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
To: CORTLAND PRODUCTS CORP., AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 040965/0383 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2016
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 040989/0070 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 15, 2016
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 040995/0825 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 035814 FRAME: 0158. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Aug 6, 2015
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 036284/0840 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2015
From: KEYSTONE ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 035814/0158 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2015
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 035801/0073 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 1, 2011
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 026064/0706 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 30, 2010
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 024906/0588 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 10, 2010
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
To: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, LLC
Reel/Frame 024505/0957 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 7, 2008
From: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, NA
Reel/Frame 020317/0903 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 7, 2007
From: NEWMAN, FREDERIC M.
To: KEY ENERGY SERVICES, INC.
Reel/Frame 019794/0786 →