IP Library Granted Patent US 7,966,212
Granted Patent B2
US 7,966,212 · App. 11/851,258 · Granted Jun 21, 2011

Quantitative alignment of business offerings with the expectations of a business prospect

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,966,212
App. No.
11/851,258
Granted
Jun 21, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

In certain embodiments, a method for quantitative alignment of business offerings with the expectations of a business prospect includes accessing a novelty indicator for an offering, the novelty indicator being based on one or more characteristics of the offering and rating an innovation level of the offering. The method further includes accessing an innovation perception indicator for a prospect of the offering, the innovation perception indicator providing an indication of how the prospect views innovation. The method further includes comparing the novelty indicator for the offering with the innovation perception indicator for the prospect to determine if the offering is aligned with the expectations of the prospect. In certain embodiments, the method includes generating a recommendation, possibly in the form of a report, based on the comparison of the novelty indicator for the offering and the innovation perception indicator for the prospect.

Claims (51)

1. A method for quantitative alignment of business offerings with the expectations of a business prospect, comprising:

with a processor, accessing a novelty indicator for an offering, the novelty indicator being based on one or more characteristics of the offering and rating an innovation level of the offering, in which the novelty indicator for the offering is determined by computing a numeric novelty index for the offering, the novelty index quantifying the innovation level of the offering;

with a processor, determining a novelty group based on the determined novelty index by determining a particular range of novelty index values within which the computed novelty index falls and determining that the novelty group for the offering comprises the novelty group that corresponds to the particular range of novelty index values;

in which the novelty indicator comprises the novelty group and in which the novelty group is one of a plurality of novelty groups, each novelty group associated with a corresponding range of novelty index values;

with a processor, accessing an innovation perception indicator for a prospect of the offering, the innovation perception indicator providing an indication of how the prospect views innovation; and

with a processor, comparing the novelty indicator for the offering with the innovation perception indicator for the prospect to determine if the offering is aligned with the expectations of the prospect.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the one or more characteristics of the offering are determined according to a questionnaire comprising one or more weighted questions, the novelty index being determined according to responses to the one or more weighted questions of the questionnaire.

3. The method of claim 2 , comprising:

initiating display of the one or more weighted questions of the questionnaire;

receiving responses to the one or more weighted questions; and

automatically determining the novelty index based on the responses to the one or more weighted questions and the weights of the one or more weighted questions.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the innovation perception indicator for the prospect is determined using the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory (KAI) tool; and

the method comprises determining a KAI score for the prospect, the innovation perception indicator for the prospect comprising the KAI score determined for the prospect.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the KAI score is estimated based on one or more determined personality traits of the prospect.

6. The method of claim 1 , comprising generating a recommendation based on the comparison of the novelty indicator for the offering and the innovation perception indicator for the prospect.

7. A computer program product for quantitative alignment of business offerings with the expectations of a business prospect, the computer program product being embodied in a computer-readable storage medium having computer usable program code embodied therewith, the computer usable program code, when executed, being operable to:

access a novelty indicator for an offering, the novelty indicator being based on one or more characteristics of the offering and rating an innovation level of the offering, in which the novelty indicator for the offering is determined by computing a numeric novelty index for the offering, the novelty index quantifying the innovation level of the offering;

determine a novelty group based on the determined novelty index by determining a particular range of novelty index values within which the computed novelty index falls and determining that the novelty group for the offering comprises the novelty group that corresponds to the particular range of novelty index values;

in which the novelty indicator comprises the novelty group and in which the novelty group is one of a plurality of novelty groups, each novelty group associated with a corresponding range of novelty index values;

access an innovation perception indicator for a prospect of the offering, the innovation perception indicator providing an indication of how the prospect views innovation; and

compare the novelty indicator for the offering with the innovation perception indicator for the prospect to determine if the offering is aligned with the expectations of the prospect.

8. The computer program product of claim 7 , wherein the one or more characteristics of the offering are determined according to a questionnaire comprising one or more weighted questions, the novelty index being determined according to responses to the one or more weighted questions of the questionnaire.

9. The computer program product of claim 8 , operable to:

initiate display of the one or more weighted questions of the questionnaire;

receive responses to the one or more weighted questions; and

automatically determine the novelty index based on the responses to the one or more weighted questions and the weights of the one or more weighted questions.

10. The computer program product of claim 7 , wherein:

the innovation perception indicator for the prospect is determined using the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory (KAI) tool; and

the software is operable to determine a KAI score for the prospect, the innovation perception indicator for the prospect comprising the KAI score determined for the prospect.

11. The computer program product of claim 10 , wherein the KAI score is estimated based on one or more determined personality traits of the prospect.

12. The computer program product of claim 7 , operable to generate a recommendation based on the comparison of the novelty indicator for the offering and the innovation perception indicator for the prospect.

13. A system for quantitative alignment of business offerings with the expectations of a business prospect, comprising:

one or more memory modules operable to:

store a novelty indicator for an offering, the novelty indicator being based on one or more characteristics of the offering and rating an innovation level of the offering in which the novelty indicator for the offering is determined by computing a numeric novelty index for the offering, the novelty index quantifying the innovation level of the offering;

determine a novelty group based on the determined novelty index by determining a particular range of novelty index values within which the computed novelty index falls and determining that the novelty group for the offering comprises the novelty group that corresponds to the particular range of novelty index values, in which the novelty indicator comprises the novelty group and in which the novelty group is one of a plurality of novelty groups, each novelty group associated with a corresponding range of novelty index values; and

store an innovation perception indicator for a prospect of the offering, the innovation perception indicator providing an indication of how the prospect views innovation; and

one or more processing units operable to:

access the novelty indicator for the offering;

access the innovation perception indicator for the prospect of the offering; and

compare the novelty indicator for the offering with the innovation perception indicator for the prospect to determine if the offering is aligned with the expectations of the prospect.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more characteristics of the offering are determined according to a questionnaire comprising one or more weighted questions, the novelty index being determined according to responses to the one or more weighted questions of the questionnaire.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the one or more processing units are operable to:

initiate display of the one or more weighted questions of the questionnaire;

receive responses to the one or more weighted questions; and

automatically determine the novelty index based on the responses to the one or more weighted questions and the weights of the one or more weighted questions.

16. The system of claim 13 , wherein:

the innovation perception indicator for the prospect is determined using the Kirton Adaptation-Innovation Inventory (KAI) tool; and

the one or more processing units are operable to determine a KAI score for the prospect, the innovation perception indicator for the prospect comprising the KAI score determined for the prospect.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the KAI score is estimated based on one or more determined personality traits of the prospect.

18. The system of claim 13 , wherein the one or more processing units are operable to generate a recommendation based on the comparison of the novelty indicator for the offering and the innovation perception indicator for the prospect.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2017
From: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
To: ENT. SERVICES DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LP
Reel/Frame 041041/0716 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 9, 2015
From: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
To: HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE DEVELOPMENT LP
Reel/Frame 037079/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2009
From: ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS, LLC
To: HEWLETT-PACKARD DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, L.P.
Reel/Frame 022449/0267 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 24, 2009
From: ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
To: ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 022460/0948 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 6, 2007
From: KASRAVI, KAS (NMI); WICK, COREY W.
To: ELECTRONIC DATA SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 019793/0108 →