IP Library Granted Patent US 8,660,784
Granted Patent B2
US 8,660,784 · App. 11/852,850 · Granted Feb 25, 2014

Methods and systems for determining driver efficiency in a vehicle

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,660,784
App. No.
11/852,850
Granted
Feb 25, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for determining driver efficiency in a vehicle includes the steps of measuring a vehicle parameter, and calculating the driver efficiency based, at least in part, on the vehicle parameter. The vehicle parameter is influenced, at least in part, by an action taken by a driver.

Claims (86)

1. A method for determining driver efficiency in a vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:

measuring a plurality of vehicle parameters that are each influenced, at least in part, by an action taken by a driver, using a sensing unit, wherein the step of measuring the plurality of penalties comprises measuring a vehicle speed and measuring a vehicle acceleration;

determining a plurality of penalties, each penalty comprising an effect of at least one of the plurality of vehicle parameters on a fuel efficiency of the vehicle using a processor, wherein the step of determining the plurality of penalties includes calculating a first penalty, based, at least in part, on the vehicle speed, the vehicle acceleration, and a known relationship correlating vehicle speed and vehicle acceleration to fuel efficiency, such that the first penalty represents a base score penalty that provides larger penalties for smaller accelerations as vehicle speed increases; and

aggregating the plurality of penalties together, to calculate the driver efficiency using the processor.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of penalties further comprises the step of:

calculating a second penalty, based, at least in part, on the vehicle speed and a known relationship correlating vehicle speed to fuel efficiency.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of penalties further comprises the steps of:

measuring an engine speed; and

calculating a third penalty, based, at least in part, on the engine speed and a known relationship correlating engine speed to fuel efficiency.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the step of determining the plurality of penalties further comprises the steps of:

determining a measure of change in application of a brake pedal, an accelerator pedal, or both; and

calculating a fourth penalty, based, at least in part, on the measure of change and a known relationship correlating such measure of change to fuel efficiency.

5. The method of claim 4 , further comprising the steps of:

determining whether the vehicle is accelerating or decelerating;

assigning the driver efficiency a positive value, if the vehicle is accelerating; and

assigning the driver efficiency a negative value, if the vehicle is decelerating.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the step of aggregating the plurality of penalties together comprises the step of:

aggregating the first penalty, the second penalty, the third penalty, and the fourth penalty together, to calculate the driver efficiency.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising the steps of:

determining whether the vehicle is accelerating or decelerating;

assigning the driver efficiency a positive value, if the vehicle is accelerating; and

assigning the driver efficiency a negative value, if the vehicle is decelerating.

8. A system for displaying driver efficiency for a vehicle, the system comprising:

a sensing unit configured to at least facilitate measuring a plurality of vehicle parameters that are each influenced, at least in part, by an action taken by a driver;

a processor coupled to the sensing unit and configured to at least facilitate:

determining a plurality of penalties, each penalty comprising an effect of at least one of the plurality of vehicle parameters on a fuel efficiency of the vehicle; and

aggregating the plurality of penalties together, to calculate the driver efficiency; and

a gauge that is movable between and within:

a first range of positions, indicating that the driver efficiency is in an ideal range;

a second range of positions, indicating that:

the driver efficiency is in not in the ideal range; and

the vehicle is decelerating; and

a third range of positions, indicating that:

the driver efficiency is in not in the ideal range; and

the vehicle is accelerating.

9. A display device for a vehicle, the display device comprising:

an input device configured to receive a driver efficiency, the driver efficiency comprising a measure of an impact of an action taken by a driver of the vehicle on a fuel efficiency of the vehicle; and

a display coupled to the input device, the display comprising a gauge configured to move between and within:

a first range of positions, indicating that the driver efficiency is in an ideal range;

a second range of positions, indicating that:

the driver efficiency is in not in the ideal range; and

the vehicle is decelerating; and

a third range of positions, indicating that:

the driver efficiency is in not in the ideal range; and

the vehicle is accelerating.

10. A method for determining driver efficiency in a vehicle, the method comprising the steps of:

measuring a plurality of vehicle parameters that are each influenced, at least in part, by an action taken by a driver, using a sensing unit;

determining a plurality of penalties, each penalty comprising an effect of at least one of the plurality of vehicle parameters on a fuel efficiency of the vehicle using a processor;

aggregating the plurality of penalties together, to calculate the driver efficiency using the processor;

determining whether the vehicle is accelerating or decelerating;

assigning the driver efficiency a positive value, if the vehicle is accelerating; and

assigning the driver efficiency a negative value, if the vehicle is decelerating.

11. A system for displaying driver efficiency for a vehicle, the system comprising:

a sensing unit configured to at least facilitate measuring a plurality of vehicle parameters that are each influenced, at least in part, by an action taken by a driver; and

a processor coupled to the sensing unit and configured to at least facilitate:

determining a plurality of penalties, each penalty comprising an effect of at least one of the plurality of vehicle parameters on a fuel efficiency of the vehicle;

aggregating the plurality of penalties together, to calculate the driver efficiency;

determining whether the vehicle is accelerating or decelerating;

assigning the driver efficiency a positive value, if the vehicle is accelerating; and

assigning the driver efficiency a negative value, if the vehicle is decelerating.

12. The system of claim 11 , wherein:

the sensing unit is configured to at least facilitate:

measuring a vehicle speed; and

measuring a vehicle acceleration; and

the processor is configured to at least facilitate:

calculating a first penalty, based, at least in part, on the vehicle speed, the vehicle acceleration, and a known relationship correlating vehicle speed and vehicle acceleration to fuel efficiency.

13. The system of claim 12 , wherein:

the processor is further configured to at least facilitate calculating a second penalty, based, at least in part, on the vehicle speed and a known relationship correlating vehicle speed to fuel efficiency.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein:

the sensing unit is further configured to at least facilitate measuring an engine speed; and

the processor is further configured to at least facilitate calculating a third penalty, based, at least in part, on the engine speed and a known relationship correlating engine speed to fuel efficiency.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein:

the sensing unit is configured to at least facilitate determining a measure of change in application of a brake pedal, an accelerator pedal, or both; and

the processor is configured to at least facilitate calculating a fourth penalty, based, at least in part, on the measure of change and a known relationship correlating such measure of change to fuel efficiency.

16. The system of claim 15 , wherein the processor is further configured to aggregate the first penalty, the second penalty, the third penalty, and the fourth penalty together, to calculate the driver efficiency.

17. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

a gauge that is movable between and within:

a first range of positions, indicating that the driver efficiency is in an ideal range;

a second range of positions, indicating that:

the driver efficiency is in not in the ideal range; and

the vehicle is decelerating; and

a third range of positions, indicating that:

the driver efficiency is in not in the ideal range; and

the vehicle is accelerating.

18. The system of claim 11 , further comprising:

a memory configured to store a known relationship correlating the vehicle parameter or one of a plurality of additional vehicle parameters, or both, to the fuel efficiency of the vehicle.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034185/0587 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0035 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0057 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025314/0946 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025245/0780 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0140 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0264 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2009
From: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023155/0880 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 20, 2009
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023124/0670 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 16, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR BANK PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES; CITICORP USA, INC. AS AGENT FOR HEDGE PRIORITY SECURED PARTIES
Reel/Frame 022554/0479 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 3, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 022195/0334 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2007
From: NEWHOUSE, VERNON L.; SIENKIEWICZ, CARLENE M.; WU, EMILY R.; KIDSTON, KEVIN S.; SCHWARZ, JONATHAN R.; ST. JOHN, DON
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 019938/0751 →