IP Library Granted Patent US 7,620,548
Granted Patent B2
US 7,620,548 · App. 11/854,720 · Granted Nov 17, 2009

Method and system for automatic detecting morphemes in a task classification system using lattices

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,620,548
App. No.
11/854,720
Granted
Nov 17, 2009
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention concerns a method and system for detecting morphemes in a user's communication. The method may include recognizing a lattice of phone strings from the user's input communication, the lattice representing a distribution over the phone strings, and detecting morphemes in the user's input communication using the lattice. The morphemes may be acoustic and/or non-acoustic. The morphemes may represent any unit or sub-unit of communication including phones, diphones, phone-phrases, syllables, grammars, words, gestures, tablet strokes, body movements, mouse clicks, etc. The training speech may be verbal, non-verbal, a combination of verbal and non-verbal, or multimodal.

Claims (21)

1. A method of task classification which operates on one or more task objectives of a user, comprising:

forming a lattice of phone strings representing morphemes in a user's input communication, the lattice representing a distribution over the phone strings;

detecting morphemes in the user's input communication using the formed lattice; and

making task-type classification decisions based on the detected morphemes in the user's input communication.

2. An automated task classification system that detects morphemes using lattices and operates on one or more task objectives of a user, comprising:

a recognizer that forms a lattice of phone strings representing morphemes in a user's input communication, the lattice representing a distribution over the phone strings;

a morpheme detector that detects morphemes in the user's input communication using the formed lattice; and

a task classification processor that makes task-type classification decisions based on the detected morphemes in the user's input communication.

3. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the morphemes include verbal speech.

4. The automated task classification system of claim 3 , wherein the morphemes further comprise non-verbal sub-morphemes comprising at least one of gestures, body movements, head movements, non-responses, text, keyboard entries, keypad entries, mouse clicks, DTMF codes, pointers, stylus, cable set-top box entries, graphical user interface entries and touchscreen entries.

5. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the morphemes are expressed in multimodal form.

6. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the user's input communication is derived from the verbal and non-verbal speech and the user's environment.

7. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the morphemes in the user's input communication include sub-morphemes that are derived from the user's actions, including the user's focus of attention.

8. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the task classification processor enters into a dialog with the user to obtain a feedback response from the user.

9. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the task classification processor prompts the user to provide a feedback response includes additional information with respect to the user's initial input communication.

10. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the task classification processor prompts the user to provide a feedback response that includes confirmation with respect to at least one of the set of task objectives determined in the classification decision.

11. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the task classification processor routes the user's input communication based on the classification decision.

12. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the task objective is performed after the task classification processor routes the user's input communication.

13. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the system operates in conjunction with one or more communication networks, the one or more communication networks including at least one of a telephone network, the Internet, an intranet, Cable TV network, a local area network (LAN), and a wireless communication network.

14. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the system is used for customer care purposes.

15. The automated task classification system of claim 2 , wherein the classification decisions and corresponding user input communications are collected for automated learning purposes.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2017
From: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
To: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 041512/0608 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2016
From: AT&T CORP.
To: AT&T PROPERTIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 038529/0164 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 26, 2016
From: AT&T PROPERTIES, LLC
To: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
Reel/Frame 038529/0240 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 15, 2016
From: GORIN, ALLEN LOUIS; PETROVSKA-DELACRETAZ, DIJANA; RICCARDI, GIUSEPPE; WRIGHT, JEREMY HUNTLEY
To: AT&T CORP.
Reel/Frame 038292/0664 →