IP Library Granted Patent US 7,668,861
Granted Patent B2
US 7,668,861 · App. 11/858,509 · Granted Feb 23, 2010

System and method to determine the validity of an interaction on a network

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,668,861
App. No.
11/858,509
Granted
Feb 23, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method are disclosed for classifying a user interaction on a network. A user interaction is identified on a network and user interaction data is collected relating to the user interaction on the network. The user interaction data includes an aggregate measure data and a unique feature data. The user interaction data is processed to generate a value score for the interaction. A classification of the user interaction is determined based on the value score.

Claims (49)

1. A computer implemented method for classifying a user interaction on a network, comprising:

identifying, with a processor, a user interaction on a network;

collecting a user interaction data relating to the user interaction on the network wherein the user interaction data comprises an aggregate measure data and a unique feature data;

processing the user interaction data to generate a value score for an Internet click interaction; and

determining a classification of the user interaction based on the value score.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the aggregate measure data comprises data representing a set of user interactions.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the aggregate measure data comprises at least one of: a number of clicks per network address for a time period, a number of unique queries per user session, a number of network clicks for the time period, and a number of distinct referral partners generating clicks for the time period.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the unique feature data comprises data representing the interaction with the user.

5. The method of claim 4 wherein the unique feature data comprises at least one of: an origin of the user, a time of the interaction, a type of the interaction, and a user cookie data.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the risk score represents a likelihood of the user interaction being valid.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the risk score represents a likelihood of the user interaction being legitimate.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the risk score represents a likelihood of the user interaction being desirable.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein a minimum amount of user interaction data is collected before processing the user interaction data.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein processing the user interaction data comprises applying a model to the user interaction data.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the model comprises a mathematical model.

12. The method of claim 11 wherein the mathematical model comprises a mathematical model of interactions derived using at least one measure of mathematical probability.

13. The method of claim 10 wherein the model comprises a model.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the model is generated by:

identifying a dataset corresponding to a set of user interactions on a network;

processing the dataset to generate a set of inputs;

generating a model from the set of inputs.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the classification of the interaction comprises at least one of: an acceptable but unusual classification, a normal behavior classification and an unacceptable classification.

16. A computer implemented method for monitoring user interactions on a network, comprising:

identifying, with a processor, a user interaction on a network;

collecting a user interaction data relating to the user interaction on the network wherein the user interaction data comprises an aggregate measure data and an unique feature data;

processing the user interaction data to generate a set of user interaction inputs;

generating a value score for an Internet click interaction by applying a model to the user interaction inputs;

determining a classification of the user interaction based on the value score; and

handling the user interaction based on the classification of the interaction.

17. The method of claim 16 wherein handling the user interaction based on the classification comprises removing the user interaction from a report used to charge network operators.

18. The method of claim 16 wherein handling the user interaction based on the classification comprises storing the value score of the interaction.

19. The method of claim 18 further comprising using the stored value score to produce a report.

20. The method of claim 16 wherein handing the user interaction based on the classification comprises ignoring interactions from a network address of the user interaction.

21. The method of claim 16 wherein the user interaction comprises clicking on a link of an advertiser.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein handling the user interaction based on the classification comprises alerting the advertiser of the classification.

23. A computer implemented method for classifying a user interaction on a network, comprising:

identifying, with a processor, a dataset corresponding to a set of user interactions on a network;

processing the dataset to generate a set of inputs;

generating a model from the set of inputs;

identifying a current user interaction on the network;

collecting a current user interaction data relating to the current user interaction on the network wherein the current user interaction data comprises an aggregate measure data and an unique feature data;

processing the current user interaction data to generate a set of current user interaction inputs;

generating a value score for an Internet click interaction by applying the model to the set of current user interaction inputs; and

determining a classification of the user interaction based on the value score.

24. The method of claim 23 further comprising reassessing the model.

25. A system for generating scores relating to interactions on a network, comprising:

a memory to store a model, a dataset, a set of inputs, a current interaction data and a set of current interaction inputs;

an interface operatively connected to the memory to collect the current interaction data from a current interaction on a network; and

a processor operatively connected to the memory and the interface, which processes the dataset to identify the set of inputs, generates the model from the set of inputs, processes the current interaction data to generate the set of current interaction inputs, and generates a value score for an Internet click interaction signifying a likelihood of the current user interaction being valid by applying the model to the set of current interaction inputs.

Assignments (9)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE ASSIGNOR NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 052853 FRAME: 0153. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Mar 29, 2021
From: R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
To: STARBOARD VALUE INTERMEDIATE FUND LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 056832/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 053654 FRAME 0254. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST GRANTED PURSUANT TO THE PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED. Recorded Dec 30, 2020
From: STARBOARD VALUE INTERMEDIATE FUND LP
To: R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 054981/0377 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jul 8, 2020
From: STARBOARD VALUE INTERMEDIATE FUND LP
To: ACACIA RESEARCH GROUP LLC; AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC; BONUTTI SKELETAL INNOVATIONS LLC; CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LLC; INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC; LIFEPORT SCIENCES LLC; LIMESTONE MEMORY SYSTEMS LLC; MOBILE ENHANCEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC; MONARCH NETWORKING SOLUTIONS LLC; NEXUS DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC; PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY ARCHITECTURE LLC; R2 SOLUTIONS LLC; SAINT LAWRENCE COMMUNICATIONS LLC; STINGRAY IP SOLUTIONS LLC; SUPER INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES LLC; TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS LLC; UNIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 053654/0254 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 25, 2020
From: EXCALIBUR IP, LLC
To: R2 SOLUTIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 053459/0059 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 5, 2020
From: ACACIA RESEARCH GROUP LLC; AMERICAN VEHICULAR SCIENCES LLC; BONUTTI SKELETAL INNOVATIONS LLC; CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT LLC; INNOVATIVE DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC; LIFEPORT SCIENCES LLC; LIMESTONE MEMORY SYSTEMS LLC; MERTON ACQUISITION HOLDCO LLC; MOBILE ENHANCEMENT SOLUTIONS LLC; MONARCH NETWORKING SOLUTIONS LLC; NEXUS DISPLAY TECHNOLOGIES LLC; PARTHENON UNIFIED MEMORY ARCHITECTURE LLC; R2 SOLUTIONS LLC; SAINT LAWRENCE COMMUNICATIONS LLC; STINGRAY IP SOLUTIONS LLC; SUPER INTERCONNECT TECHNOLOGIES LLC; TELECONFERENCE SYSTEMS LLC; UNIFICATION TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: STARBOARD VALUE INTERMEDIATE FUND LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 052853/0153 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 3, 2016
From: YAHOO! INC.
To: EXCALIBUR IP, LLC
Reel/Frame 038950/0592 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2016
From: EXCALIBUR IP, LLC
To: YAHOO! INC.
Reel/Frame 038951/0295 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 18, 2016
From: YAHOO! INC.
To: EXCALIBUR IP, LLC
Reel/Frame 038383/0466 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 9, 2008
From: OVERTURE SERVICES, INC
To: YAHOO! INC
Reel/Frame 021652/0654 →