IP Library Granted Patent US 7,685,242
Granted Patent B2
US 7,685,242 · App. 11/862,195 · Granted Mar 23, 2010

System for policing junk e-mail messages

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,685,242
App. No.
11/862,195
Granted
Mar 23, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for policying an unsolicited e-mail communication. The system has a plurality of clients, each coupled together using a wide area network of computers, such as the Internet or an internet. Each of the clients is adapted to send an indication of an unsolicited e-mail message through an e-mail device for a display. The system also has a policying server coupled to each of the plurality of clients through the wide area network of computers. The policying server is adapted to receive the indication from at least one of the clients. The e-mail device comprises an SPAM icon on the display The SPAM icon is adapted to send the indication from the client to the policying server.

Claims (19)

1. A method for a computer system including a processor comprises

receiving reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by e-mail senders from users at user e-mail addresses in the processor, wherein each unwanted e-mail request violation includes an indication of a first unwanted e-mail message initiated by an e-mail sender, an indication of a previously transmitted request to the e-mail sender from the user not to initiate any future unwanted e-mail messages to a user e-mail address, and an indication of a second unwanted e-mail message initiated by the e-mail sender in violation of the previously transmitted request;

determining whether a number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by a specific e-mail sender exceeds a threshold number with the processor; and

when the number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations exceeds the threshold number, reporting the unwanted e-mail request violations using the processor.

2. The method of claim 1

wherein reporting the unwanted e-mail request violations comprises providing the reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by the specific e-mail sender; and

wherein the threshold number exceeds one.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein reporting the unwanted e-mail request violations comprises providing the reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by the specific e-mail sender to service providers selected from the group: internet service providers, Yahoo!, Earthlinik, GeoCities, AOL, Compuserve, Prodigy, MSN.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the service providers determines whether the specific e-mail sender includes header information that uses a domain name of the service providers without permission of the internet service providers, in response to the violation of the request.

5. The method of claim 2 wherein reporting the unwanted e-mail request violations comprises providing the reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by the specific e-mail sender to a governmental entity selected from the group: law enforcement authorities, state authorities, federal authorities.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

when the number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations exceeds the threshold number, determining updated filter-out lists to include the specific e-mail sender; and

sending the updated filter-out lists e-mail service providers.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein the e-mail service providers comprise: internet service providers, HotMail, Yahoo!, Excite, Earthlink, GeoCities, AOL, Compuserve, Prodigy, MSN.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the e-mail service providers filter-out subsequent e-mail messages from the specific e-mail sender in response to the updated filter-out lists.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the threshold number is selected with respect to a number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by other e-mail senders.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the threshold number is selected in response to a number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations for most frequent e-mail senders;

wherein the most frequent e-mail senders are selected from the group comprising: one hundredth, five hundredth, one thousandth.

11. The method of claim 1 wherein determining whether a number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations by a specific e-mail sender exceeds a threshold number further comprises determining whether a threshold number of reports of unwanted e-mail request violations occur within a set time period.

Assignments (5)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 13, 2023
From: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 186 LLC
To: MIND FUSION, LLC
Reel/Frame 064271/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2023
From: MIND FUSION, LLC
To: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 191 LLC; INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 186 LLC
Reel/Frame 063295/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 12, 2023
From: GULA CONSULTING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
To: INTELLECTUAL VENTURES ASSETS 186 LLC
Reel/Frame 062756/0052 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 20, 2016
From: FORTUNE COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C.
To: GULA CONSULTING LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY
Reel/Frame 037539/0672 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 12, 2011
From: PANG, STEPHEN Y.F.
To: FORTUNE COMMUNICATIONS, L.L.C.
Reel/Frame 027368/0839 →