IP Library Granted Patent US 7,656,053
Granted Patent B2
US 7,656,053 · App. 11/890,313 · Granted Feb 2, 2010

Controlling power extraction for wind power generation

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,656,053
App. No.
11/890,313
Granted
Feb 2, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A power generation system is disclosed. The power generation system comprises a kite connected to a line. The line is alternatively let out during a traction phase and recovered during a recovery phase. A power extractor connected to the line to extract power during the traction phase. And, a power extraction controller configured to target a preferred traction phase line velocity and a preferred recovery phase line velocity.

Claims (45)

1. A power generation system comprising:

a kite connected to a line wherein the line is alternatively let out during a traction phase and recovered during a recovery phase;

a power extractor connected to the line to extract power during the traction phase;

a power extraction controller configured to target a preferred traction phase line velocity and a preferred recovery phase line velocity.

2. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extractor comprises an electric generator.

3. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine a velocity ratio based at least in part on the preferred traction phase line velocity and the preferred recovery phase line velocity.

4. A system as in claim 3 , wherein the velocity ratio is based at least in part on a force ratio.

5. A system as in claim 4 , wherein the power extraction controller improves the force ratio to improve power extraction efficiency by changing the force ratio from a first ratio to a second ratio and measuring power extraction efficiency to determine whether the first ratio or the second ratio is more efficient for power extraction.

6. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred traction phase line velocity based at least in part on a wind speed.

7. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred recovery phase line velocity based at least in part on a wind speed.

8. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred traction phase line velocity based at least in part on a line load.

9. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred recovery phase line velocity based at least in part on a line load.

10. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred traction phase line velocity based at least in part on one or more of the following: a line length, a kite angle to a line, a kite position, an image captured by a camera, a radar, a pressure sensor, a location sensor, or a global positioning sensor.

11. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred recovery phase line velocity based at least in part on one or more of the following: a line length, a kite angle to a line, a kite position, an image captured by a camera, a radar, a pressure sensor, a location sensor, or a global positioning sensor.

12. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred traction phase line velocity based at least in part on a constraint due to the power extractor.

13. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred recovery phase line velocity based at least in part on a constraint due to the power extractor.

14. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred traction phase line velocity based at least in part on a constraint due to a force limit.

15. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine the preferred recovery phase line velocity based at least in part on a constraint due to a force limit.

16. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine a traction phase line velocity near a turn around based at least in part on a constraint due to a line length.

17. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to determine a recovery phase line velocity near a turn around based at least in part on a constraint due to a line length.

18. A system as in claim 1 , wherein the power extraction controller is configured to maintain a tension on the line by applying a retarding torque during the traction phase.

19. A method for power generation comprising:

determining a preferred traction phase line velocity and a preferred recovery phase line velocity;

configuring a controller to target the preferred traction phase line velocity for a line connected to a kite during a traction phase, wherein during the traction phase the line is let out and power is extracted as the line is being let out; and

configuring a controller to target the preferred recovery phase line velocity a line connected to the kite during a recovery phase, wherein during the recovery phase the line is recovered.

20. A method as in claim 19 , wherein power is extracted using an electric generator.

21. A method as in claim 19 , wherein a velocity ratio is determined based at least in part on the preferred traction phase line velocity and the preferred recovery phase line velocity.

22. A method as in claim 21 , wherein the velocity ratio is based at least in part on a force ratio.

23. A method as in claim 22 , wherein the controller improves power extraction efficiency by changing the force ratio from a first ratio to a second ratio and measuring power extraction efficiency to determine whether the first ratio or the second ratio is more efficient for power extraction.

24. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred traction phase line velocity is based at least in part on a wind speed.

25. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred recovery phase line velocity is based at least in part on a wind speed.

26. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred traction phase line velocity is based at least in part on a line load.

27. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred recovery phase line velocity is based at least in part on a line load.

28. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred traction phase line velocity is based at least in part on one or more of the following: a line length, a kite angle to a line, a kite position, an image captured by a camera, a radar, a pressure sensor, a location sensor, or a global positioning sensor.

29. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred recovery phase line velocity is based at least in part on one or more of the following: a line length, a kite angle to a line, a kite position, an image captured by a camera, a radar, a pressure sensor, a location sensor, or a global positioning sensor.

30. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred traction phase line velocity is based at least in part on a power extractor constraint.

31. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred recovery phase line velocity is based at least in part on a power extractor constraint.

32. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred traction phase line velocity is based at least in part on a force limit constraint.

33. A method as in claim 19 , wherein the preferred recovery phase line velocity is based at least in part on a force limit constraint.

34. A method as in claim 19 , further comprising determining a traction phase line velocity near a turn around that is based at least in part on a line length.

35. A method as in claim 19 , further comprising determining a recovery phase line velocity near a turn around that is based at least in part on a line length.

36. A computer program product for power generation, the computer program product being embodied in a computer readable medium and comprising computer instructions for:

determining a preferred traction phase line velocity and a preferred recovery phase line velocity;

configuring a controller to target the preferred traction phase line velocity for a line connected to a kite during a traction phase, wherein during the traction phase the line is let out and power is extracted as the line is being let out; and

configuring a controller to target the preferred recovery phase line velocity a line connected to the kite during a recovery phase, wherein during the recovery phase the line is recovered.

Assignments (13)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2019
From: X DEVELOPMENT LLC
To: MAKANI TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 048355/0016 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CORRECTIVE BY NULLIFICATIONTO CORRECT INCORRECTLY RECORDED APPLICATION NUMBERS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 044142 FRAME 0357. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Nov 14, 2018
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 047837/0678 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 25, 2018
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: X DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 047631/0671 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 6, 2017
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: GOOGLE LLC
Reel/Frame 044142/0357 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 1, 2016
From: GOOGLE INC.
To: X DEVELOPMENT LLC
Reel/Frame 039900/0610 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SERIAL NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 036618 FRAME: 0623. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 23, 2015
From: MAKANI POWER, INC.
To: CLOCK LLC
Reel/Frame 037154/0695 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SERIAL NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 032493 FRAME: 0690. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 23, 2015
From: CLOCK LLC
To: MAKANI POWER, INC.
Reel/Frame 037154/0747 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NUMBER 12/545,853 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 026679 FRAME 0019. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Nov 23, 2015
From: MAKANI POWER, INC.
To: GOOGLE ENDEAVOR LLC
Reel/Frame 037152/0817 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE SERIAL NUMBER PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 028201 FRAME 0281. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT WAS INCORRECTLY RECORDED UNDER SERIAL NUMBER 12/545,853. THE CORRECT SERIAL NUMBER IS 12/454,853. Recorded Nov 23, 2015
From: GOOGLE ENDEAVOR LLC
To: GOOGLE VENTURES 2012, L.P.
Reel/Frame 037152/0756 →
CANCELLATION STATEMENT Recorded Mar 21, 2014
From: CLOCK LLC
To: MAKANI POWER, INC.
Reel/Frame 032493/0690 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 26, 2013
From: MAKANI POWER, INC.
To: GOOGLE INC.
Reel/Frame 030886/0126 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 3, 2012
From: MAKANI POWER, INC.
To: CLOCK LLC
Reel/Frame 028721/0335 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNEE'S INTEREST Recorded May 14, 2012
From: GOOGLE ENDEAVOR LLC
To: GOOGLE VENTURES 2012, L.P.
Reel/Frame 028201/0281 →