IP Library Granted Patent US 8,023,424
Granted Patent B2
US 8,023,424 · App. 11/914,657 · Granted Sep 20, 2011

Communication node and a method for routing traffic in a communication network by calculating at least one metric for at least one link and a sensitivity parameter for said metric

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,023,424
App. No.
11/914,657
Granted
Sep 20, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a method of routing traffic from a sender to a receiver in a communication network said method comprising for at least two possible routes between the sender and the receiver the step of calculating at least one metric for at least one link in each route, characterized by the steps of calculating a sensitivity parameter for said at least one metric and taking said sensitivity parameter into account when selecting a route. The sensitivity parameter may be based on a derivative of said metric with respect to a variable on which said metric depends. The method may also comprise the step of calculating a reliability parameter for said at least one metric and taking said reliability parameter into account when selecting a route.

Claims (42)

1. A communication node for use in a communication network in which data can be transmitted between a sender and a receiver via at least two different routes, each route comprising at least one link, said node comprising:

a link management function unit (LMF) arranged to:

calculate a metric value for each link;

calculate a reliability parameter value for each metric value;

discard any link from consideration when the reliability parameter value for the link is less than a defined minimum reliability parameter value;

calculate a sensitivity parameter value for each remaining metric value, said sensitivity parameter value being indicative of how the metric value for each link would change with a given change of a performance parameter of each link;

calculate a modified metric value for each link as the sum of the metric value for the link plus the product of the sensitivity parameter value and the change of the performance parameter for each link;

sum the modified metric values for all of the links in each route to obtain a modified metric sum for each route; and

select a lowest cost route through the communication network by selecting the route with the lowest modified metric sum.

2. The node according to claim 1 , wherein the link management function unit (LMF) is arranged to calculate said sensitivity parameter value based on a derivative of said metric value with respect to a variable on which said metric value depends.

3. The node according to claim 1 , wherein the link management function unit is arranged to transmit said metric values and/or said sensitivity parameter values and/or said reliability parameter values to at least one other link management function unit of another node in the communication network.

4. The node according to claim 1 , wherein the link management function unit is arranged to receive metric values and/or sensitivity parameter values and/or reliability parameter values from at least one other link management function unit of another node in the communication network.

5. A method in a communication node in a communication network in which data can be transmitted between a sender and a receiver via at least two different routes, each route comprising at least one link, said method comprising the following steps performed by a link management function unit (LMF) in the communication node:

calculating a metric value (M i ) for each link (i) in each route;

calculating a sensitivity parameter value (S i ) for each metric value, said sensitivity parameter being indicative of how the metric value would change with a given change (ΔP) of a network parameter (P);

calculating a modified metric value M i ˜=M i +S i ΔP for each link;

summing the modified metric values for all of the links in each route to obtain a modified metric sum for each route; and

selecting a lowest cost route through the communication network by selecting the route with the lowest modified metric sum.

6. The method according to claim 5 , wherein the sensitivity parameter is based on a derivative of said metric with respect to a variable on which said metric depends.

7. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising the step of calculating a reliability parameter for said at least one metric and taking said reliability parameter into account when selecting a route.

8. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising the step of receiving metric and sensitivity parameter values related to at least a second link in the network and taking said received metric and sensitivity parameter values into account when selecting a route.

9. The method according to claim 5 , further comprising the steps of:

calculating a reliability parameter value for each metric value; and

discarding any link from consideration when the reliability parameter value for the link is less than a defined minimum reliability parameter value.

10. A communication node for use in a communication network in which data can be transmitted between a sender and a receiver via at least two different routes, each route comprising at least one link, said node comprising:

a link management function unit (LMF) arranged to:

calculate a metric value (M i ) for each link (i) in each route;

calculate a sensitivity parameter value (S i ) for each metric value, said sensitivity parameter being indicative of how the metric value would change with a given change (ΔP) of a network parameter (P);

calculate a modified metric value M i ˜=M i +S i ΔP for each link;

sum the modified metric values for all of the links in each route to obtain a modified metric sum for each route; and

select a lowest cost route through the communication network by selecting the route with the lowest modified metric sum.

11. The communication node according to claim 10 , further comprising a signaling unit that sends the calculated metric values and sensitivity parameter values for each link to at least one other LMF in another communication node in the network.

12. The communication node according to claim 10 , wherein the network parameter (P) is a current traffic load (L i ) on each link, and the LMF is adapted to calculate the metric value Mi as a function of L i and a capacity (C i ) of each link.

13. The communication node according to claim 10 , wherein the LMF is also adapted to:

calculate a reliability parameter value (R i ) for each metric value; and

discard any link from consideration when R i for the link is less than a defined minimum R imin .

14. The communication node according to claim 13 , wherein the LMF is adapted to calculate the reliability parameter value (R 1 ) based on at least one of:

reliability of the accuracy of an estimation of the metric value;

rate of change of the metric value;

frequency with which the metric value is estimated;

frequency with which estimated metric values are distributed to the communication node; and

signaling delay of the metric value.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 15, 2016
From: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC
To: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 039359/0916 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE NATURE OF CONVEYANCE TO READ "SECURITY INTEREST" PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 032786 FRAME 0546. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY INTEREST. Recorded Jul 8, 2014
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 033281/0216 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 30, 2014
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 032786/0546 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2014
From: CLUSTER LLC
To: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 032326/0402 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2014
From: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET L M ERICSSON (PUBL)
To: CLUSTER LLC
Reel/Frame 032326/0219 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 6, 2014
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION (AS COLLATERAL AGENT)
Reel/Frame 032167/0406 →
LIEN Recorded Dec 20, 2013
From: OPTIS CELLULAR TECHNOLOGY, LLC
To: HIGHBRIDGE PRINCIPAL STRATEGIES, LLC (AS COLLATERAL AGENT)
Reel/Frame 031866/0697 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 4, 2009
From: PRYTZ, MIKAEL; MAGNUSSON, PER; LUNDSJO, JOHAN; SACHS, JOACHIM; HASSELGREN, JOAKIM; MOHSLER, GABRIELE
To: TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
Reel/Frame 022781/0959 →