IP Library Granted Patent US 8,055,037
Granted Patent B2
US 8,055,037 · App. 11/928,121 · Granted Nov 8, 2011

Robust reconstruction method for parallel magnetic resonance images

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,055,037
App. No.
11/928,121
Granted
Nov 8, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods and systems for reconstruction of an image from parallel Magnetic Resonance Image (pMRI) data are disclosed. A reconstructed pMRI image may suffer from noise and aliasing. A method for reducing aliasing by applying a bounded error function is disclosed. A method for reducing noise in a reconstruction by applying an error term is also disclosed. Error terms are included in an expression that can be solved as a minimization problem. Creating a solution in an iterative way is also disclosed. Examples of specific solutions are provided. A system applying the methods is also provided.

Claims (680)

1. A method for parallel Magnetic Resonance Image (pMRI) reconstruction from image data, comprising:

a processor processing acquired lines in k-space to reconstruct an image from image data that is obtained in parallel from a plurality of Magnetic Resonance receivers, each Magnetic Resonance receiver acquiring a subset of lines associated with the image; and

the processor optimizing a quality measure in the reconstructed image by applying a bounded penalty.

2. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the bounded penalty is determined by the processor by applying an error function

σ

α

(

arg

)

=

i

(

1

-

-

α

arg

i

2

)

wherein α is an application dependent parameter and arg is an argument vector which contains elements arg i .

3. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

the processor applying a discontinuity preserving spatial coherency function to image data for reducing noise.

4. The method as claimed in claim 3 , wherein the function is expressed as:

ƒ( x )=λσ α 2 ( Ax ); wherein

α 2 is a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

λ denotes a strength of smoothing: x denotes the reconstructed image; and

A denotes a node-edge incidence matrix.

5. The method as claimed in claim 4 , further comprising the processor solving

min

x

f

(

x

)

=

min

x

i

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

+

λσ

α

2

(

A

x

)

;

wherein

K is a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

i relates to a coil i out of N coils;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i represents a sensitivity map for coil i;

α 1 expresses a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

α 2 expresses a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

λ controls a smoothing;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine,

x represents the reconstructed image.

6. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein an error data term due to aliasing is expressed as

f

(

x

)

=

i

=

1

N

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

with

σ

α

(

arg

)

=

j

(

1

-

-

α

*

arg

j

2

)

;

wherein

K is a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

i relates to a coil i out of N coils;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i represents a sensitivity map for coil i;

α 1 express a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

α 2 expresses a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine,

x represents the reconstructed image; and

arg is an argument vector which contains elements arg j .

7. The method as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the bounded penalty is applied iteratively by the processor.

8. The method as claimed in claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating C 1,i by C α 1 (FS i x t −y i );

estimating C 2 by C α 2 (Ax t );

solving in an iterative way an equation

(

i

S

i

T

F

T

K

C

1

,

i

F

S

i

+

λ

A

T

C

2

A

)

x

t

=

(

i

S

i

T

F

T

K

C

l

,

i

y

i

)

 for X t ,

and

stopping solving when ∥x t −x t−1 ∥≧ε or when a maximum number of iterations has been reached, and wherein

C α (argument) is a diagonal matrix representation with exponential terms representing elements of a vector argument;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i represents a sensitivity map for coil i;

A denotes a node-edge incidence matrix;

T denotes a matrix transposition;

α 1 expresses a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

α 2 expresses a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

K a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

λ controls a smoothing;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine, and

x t represents the reconstructed image at an iteration t.

9. The method as claimed in claim 8 , whereinα 1 =20,000, α 2 =800, λ=0.0025 and

ε=1e−7.

10. A method for parallel Magnetic Resonance Image (pMRI) reconstruction from image data, comprising:

a processor processing acquired lines in k-space to reconstruct an image from image data that is obtained in parallel from multiple Magnetic Resonance receivers, each Magnetic Resonance receiver acquiring a subset of lines associated with the image; and

the processor adjusting acquired lines in k-space to meet a quality measure of the reconstructed image by applying a bounded penalty.

11. The method as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the quality measure is expressed as an error function

f

(

x

)

=

i

=

1

N

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

with

σ

α

(

arg

)

=

j

(

1

-

-

α

*

arg

j

2

)

wherein:

K a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

i relates to a coil i out of N coils;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i represents a sensitivity map for coil i;

α 1 expresses a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine,

x represents the reconstructed image; and

arg is an argument vector which contains elements arg j .

12. The method as claimed in claim 10 , further comprising:

using a discontinuity preserving spatial coherency function for reducing noise.

13. The method as claimed in claim 12 , wherein the function is expressed as:

f

(

x

)

=

λ

σ

α

2

(

A

x

)

with

σ

α

(

arg

)

=

j

(

1

-

-

α

*

arg

j

2

)

wherein

λ denotes a strength of smoothing;

α 2 is a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

x denotes the reconstructed image;

A denotes a node-edge incidence matrix; and

arg is an argument vector which contains elements arg j .

14. The method as claimed in claim 10 , further comprising solving

min

x

f

(

x

)

=

min

x

i

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

+

λσ

α

2

(

A

x

)

with

σ

α

(

arg

)

=

j

(

1

-

-

α

*

arg

j

2

)

wherein

K is a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

i relates to a coil i out of N coils;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i presents a sensitivity map for coil i;

α l expresses a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

α 2 expresses a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

λ controls a smoothing;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine,

x represents the reconstructed image; and

arg is an argument vector which contains elements arg j .

15. The method as claimed in claim 10 , wherein the bounded penalty is applied iteratively.

16. A system for parallel Magnetic Resonance Image (pMRI) reconstruction from image data, comprising:

a processor;

software operable on the processor to:

processing acquired lines in k-space to reconstruct an image from image data that is obtained in parallel from multiple Magnetic Resonance receivers, each Magnetic Resonance receiver acquiring a subset of lines associated with the image; and

optimizing a quality measure in the reconstructed image by applying a bounded penalty.

17. The system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the bounded penalty is applied iteratively.

18. The system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein the bounded penalty is determined by an error function

σ

α

(

x

)

=

i

(

1

-

-

α

x

i

2

)

wherein α is an application dependent parameter and x is an argument vector which contains elements x i .

19. The system as claimed in claim 16 , further comprising:

using a discontinuity preserving spatial coherency function for reducing noise.

20. The system as claimed in claim 19 , wherein the function is expressed as:

ƒ( x )=λσ α 2 ( Ax ); wherein

α 2 gradient level defining a discontinuity;

λ denotes a strength of smoothing; x denotes the reconstructed image; and

A denotes a node-edge incidence matrix.

21. The system as claimed in claim 16 , wherein an error data term due to aliasing is expressed as

f

(

x

)

=

i

=

1

N

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

with

σ

α

(

arg

)

=

j

(

1

-

-

α

*

arg

j

2

)

;

wherein

K is a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

i relates to a coil i out of N coils;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i represents a sensitivity map for coil i;

α 1 expresses a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

α 2 expresses a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine,

x represents the reconstructed image; and

arg is an argument vector which contains elements arg j .

22. The system as claimed in claim 16 , further comprising solving

min

x

f

(

x

)

=

min

x

i

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

+

λσ

α

2

(

A

x

)

min

x

f

(

x

)

=

min

x

i

σ

α

1

(

K

y

i

-

K

F

S

i

x

)

+

λσ

α

2

(

A

x

)

;

wherein

K is a diagonal matrix reflecting known frequencies;

i relates to a coil i out of N coils;

F is a discrete Fourier transformation matrix;

S i represents a sensitivity map for coil i;

α 1 expresses a point at which an acquired line is defined an outlier;

α 2 expresses a gradient level defining a discontinuity;

λ controls a smoothing;

y i is a known component of a coil i in a MRI machine,

x represents the reconstructed image.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 28, 2016
From: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
To: SIEMENS HEALTHCARE GMBH
Reel/Frame 039271/0561 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 6, 2009
From: SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH, INC.
To: SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
Reel/Frame 022506/0596 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 6, 2008
From: GRADY, LEO; SINOP, ALI KEMAL
To: SIEMENS CORPORATE RESEARCH, INC.
Reel/Frame 020608/0185 →