IP Library Granted Patent US 7,739,063
Granted Patent B2
US 7,739,063 · App. 11/940,296 · Granted Jun 15, 2010

Nonlinear measurement system error correction

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,739,063
App. No.
11/940,296
Granted
Jun 15, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for eliminating the systematic measurement errors from a measurement system, for example a vector network analyzer, such that an accurate representation of the behavior of a nonlinear device can be measured or characterized. The cross-frequency phase and absolute amplitude of the measured voltage waves applied to and emanating from the nonlinear device are measured and error corrected. These waves may be used for nonlinear device characterization or modeling.

Claims (44)

1. A method of reducing systematic errors in a measurement system comprising:

receiving calibration signals by the measurement system from calibration devices including a power sensor and a phase reference;

determining absolute amplitude of isolated error terms based on calibration signals from the power sensor attached to a port of the measurement system and determining cross-frequency phase of isolated error terms based on calibration signals from the phase reference attached to the port of the measurement system, wherein the isolated error terms comprise error terms of a destination error model;

applying the isolated error terms of the destination error model to characterize the measurement system;

receiving measurement signals from a device under test; and

displaying error corrected results of the device under test measurement signals using the characterized measurement system.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising constructing an error correction matrix using the isolated error terms of the destination error correction model.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising separating error terms of the destination error model to present the isolated error terms of the destination error model.

4. The method of claim 3 wherein the error terms are isolated using a lookup table.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein determining the absolute amplitude and the cross-frequency phase of the isolated error term comprises:

determining the absolute amplitude of a selected error term from the isolated error terms;

determining the cross-frequency phase of the selected error term; and

solving for remaining error terms using the absolute amplitude and the cross-frequency phase of the selected error term.

6. The method of claim 1 further comprising applying hardware standards to quantify error terms of the destination error model.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising performing relative error correction on the measurement system to quantify error terms of a first error model.

8. The method of claim 7 further comprising converting the first error model to the destination error model.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein converting the first error model to the destination error model is performed using a lookup table.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the first error model is a 12-term error model, an 8-term error model, or a 16-term error model.

11. The method of claim 8 wherein the first error model is a 12-term error model and the destination error model is an 8-term error model and wherein convening from the 12-term error model to the 8-term error model comprises using a port match difference term to facilitate the converting.

12. The method of claim 8 wherein the first error model is a 12-term error model and the destination error model is an 8-term error model and wherein convening from the 12 term error model to the 8 term error model comprises:

using tracking conversions for e 1 10 e 2 01 ; and

using tracking conversions for e 2 10 e 1 01 .

13. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

measuring raw incident and reflected voltage waves of a device under test, the device under test connected to the measurement system; and

applying the error correction matrix to the raw incident and reflected voltage waves of the device under test to get corrected data.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein, the measurement system is a vector network analyzer, a real-time or equivalent-time oscilloscope, or a vector signal analyzer.

15. A computer readable media containing code thereon, the code providing instructions to a measurement system for executing the steps of:

determining absolute amplitude of isolated error terms based on calibration signals from a power sensor attached to a port of the measurement system and determining cross-frequency phase of isolated error terms based on calibration signals from a phase reference attached to the port of the measurement system, wherein the isolated error terms comprise error terms of a destination error model; and

applying the isolated error terms of the destination error model to characterize the measurement system.

16. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 15 , the code providing instructions to the measurement system for executing the additional steps of:

measuring raw incident and reflected voltage waves of a device under test, the device under test connected to the measurement system; and

applying the error correction matrix to the raw incident and reflected voltage waves of the device under test to get corrected data.

17. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 15 , the code providing instructions to the measurement system for executing the additional step of quantifying error correction terms of the measurement system by performing relative error correction.

18. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 15 , wherein:

the absolute amplitude is measured by an amplitude calibration device, the amplitude calibration device connected to the measurement system; and

the cross-frequency phase is measured by a phase calibration device, the phase calibration device connected to the measurement system.

19. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 15 , the code providing instructions to the measurement system for executing the additional step of applying hardware standards to quantify error terms of the destination error model.

20. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 15 , wherein the measurement system is a vector network analyzer, a real-time or equivalent-time oscilloscope, or a vector signal analyzer.

21. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 15 , the code providing instructions to the measurement system for executing the additional step of modifying a first error model to include a port match difference term to facilitate creating the destination error model.

22. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 21 , the code providing instructions to the measurement system wherein the first error model of the measurement system is a 12-term, 8-term or 16-term error model; and

the destination error model of the measurement system is an 8-term or 16-term error model.

23. The computer readable media containing code thereon as recited in claim 22 , the code providing instructions to the measurement system wherein convening from the 12 term error model to the 8 term error model comprises:

using tracking conversions for e 1 10 e 2 01 and

using tracking conversions for e 2 10 e 1 01 .

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 16, 2014
From: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033746/0714 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 14, 2007
From: BETTS, LOREN C.; GUNYAN, DANIEL B.
To: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 020113/0915 →