IP Library Granted Patent US 7,958,076
Granted Patent B2
US 7,958,076 · App. 11/998,581 · Granted Jun 7, 2011

System and methods for managing rules and detecting reciprocal dependencies

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,958,076
App. No.
11/998,581
Granted
Jun 7, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of automatically determining firing priority in a plurality of rules. The method includes the steps of determining a level of dependency of each rule; and generating a hierarchy of rules in response to the level of dependency of each rule, wherein the firing priority corresponds to the hierarchy of rules. In another embodiment, the method further includes the step of determining if the hierarchy results in an inconsistency. In another embodiment, the method further comprises the step of determining if the hierarchy results in a loop. In yet another embodiment, the step of determining a level of dependency of each rule is performed in response to an initial event. In one embodiment the method includes the step of determining if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules.

Claims (54)

1. A computer-implemented method of automatically executing a set of rules, the method comprising the steps of:

determining if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules in a rule based expert system;

determining a level of dependency of each rule in the set of rules in the rule based expert system; recursively removing the rule with the lowest level of dependency until the set is empty in the rule based expert system; and

determining a firing priority for the set of rules using the rule based expert system.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein a plurality of rules with the same level of dependency are removed simultaneously.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 further comprising the step of checking consistencies between the rules in the set of rules.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining is performed in response to an initial event.

5. A system for automatically executing a set of rules, the system comprising:

a processor;

means for determining if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules in a rule based expert system;

means for determining a level of dependency of each rule in the set of rules in the rule based expert system; and

means for recursively removing the rule with the lowest level of dependency until the set is empty in the rule based expert system,

wherein the means for determining a level of dependency of each rule is in communication with the means for recursively removing the rule with the lowest level of dependency, wherein the processor determines a firing priority for the set of rules in the rule based expert system.

6. The system of claim 5 further comprising means for checking consistencies between the rules in the set of rules.

7. The system of claim 5 further comprising means for storing the level of dependency of each rule.

8. A system for automatically executing a set of rules, the system comprising:

a processor;

a rule dependency determining module in a rule based expert system;

a loop checking module in communication with the rule dependency determining module wherein the loop checking module determines if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules in the rule based expert system; and

a rule firing module in communication with the rule dependency determining module in the rule based expert system,

wherein the rule dependency determining module determines a level of dependency of each rule in the set of rules, and

wherein the rule firing module recursively removes the rule with the lowest level of dependency until the set is empty, wherein the processor determines a firing priority for the set of rules in the rule based expert system.

9. The system of claim 8 further comprising a consistency checking module in communication with the rule dependency determining module wherein the consistency checking module for checking consistencies between the rules in the set of rules.

10. The system of claim 8 further comprising a memory unit in communication with the rule dependency determining module wherein the memory unit stores the level of dependency of each rule.

11. A computer-implemented method of automatically executing a set of rules, the method comprising the steps of:

a) determining if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules in a rule based expert system;

b) determining a level of dependency of each rule in the set of rules in the rule based expert system;

c) selecting a rule with the lowest dependency from the set of rules in the rule based expert system;

d) firing the rule in the rule based expert system;

e) excluding the rule from the set of rules in the rule based expert system and

f) repeating steps (c)-(e) in the rule based expert system until the set of rules is empty and the firing priority for the set of rules has been determined using the rule based expert system.

12. The method of claim 11 further comprising the step of checking consistencies between a plurality of rules in the set of rules.

13. The method of claim 11 wherein the step of determining is performed in response to an initial event.

14. A system for automatically executing a set of rules, the system comprising:

a processor;

means for determining if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules means for determining a level of dependency of each rule in the set of rules in a rule based expert system;

means for selecting a rule with the lowest dependency from the set of rules, the means for selecting in communication with the means for determining in the rule based expert system;

means for firing the rule, the means for firing in communication with the means for selecting in the rule based expert system; and

means for excluding the rule from the set of rules, the means for excluding in communication with the means for firing in the rule based expert system, wherein the processor determines a firing priority for the set of rules in the rule based expert system.

15. The system of claim 14 further comprising means for checking consistencies between a plurality of rules in the set of rules.

16. The system of claim 14 further comprising means for storing the levels of dependencies of each rule.

17. A system for automatically executing a set of rules, the system comprising:

a processor programmed to determine the firing priority for the set of rules;

a loop detecting module in communication with a rule dependency determining module wherein the loop detecting module determines if there are reciprocal dependencies between any two rules in the set of rules in a rule based expert system;

a rule dependency determining module in the rule based expert system;

a rule selection module in communication with the rule dependency determining module in the rule based expert system;

a rule firing module in communication with the rule selection module in the rule based expert system; and

a rule exclusion module in communication with the rule firing module in the rule based expert system,

wherein the rule dependency determining module determines a level of dependency of each rule in the set of rules,

wherein the rule selection module selects a rule with the lowest dependency from the set of rules,

wherein the rule firing module fires the selected rule in the rule based expert system, and

wherein the rule exclusion module excludes the selected rule from the set of rules.

18. The system of claim 17 further comprising a consistency checking module in communication with a rule dependency determining module wherein the consistency checking module checks for consistencies between a plurality of rules in the set of rules.

19. The system of claim 17 further comprising a memory unit in communication with a rule dependency determining module for storing the levels of dependencies of each rule.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL/FRAME (057254/0557) Recorded Aug 29, 2022
From: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE AGENCY, LLC
To: STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED; STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES BERMUDA LTD.
Reel/Frame 061354/0599 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Jun 9, 2021
From: STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED; STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES BERMUDA LTD.
To: CERBERUS BUSINESS FINANCE AGENCY, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057254/0557 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 3, 2020
From: STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LIMITED
To: TRUST BANK (AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO SUNTRUST BANK)
Reel/Frame 052316/0371 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 24, 2020
From: STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES BERMUDA LTD.
To: STRATUS TECHNOLOGIES IRELAND LTD.
Reel/Frame 052210/0411 →