IP Library Granted Patent US 8,481,907
Granted Patent B2
US 8,481,907 · App. 12/009,595 · Granted Jul 9, 2013

Mapping electrical crosstalk in pixelated sensor arrays

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,481,907
App. No.
12/009,595
Granted
Jul 9, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

The effects of inter pixel capacitance in a pixilated array may be measured by first resetting all pixels in the array to a first voltage, where a first image is read out, followed by resetting only a subset of pixels in the array to a second voltage, where a second image is read out, where the difference in the first and second images provide information about the inter pixel capacitance. Other embodiments are described and claimed.

Claims (20)

1. A system comprising:

an array of pixels; and

a controller coupled to the array of pixels, the controller configured to:

acquire a first family of images, wherein each image in the first family of images is a first image based on setting a reset voltage of each pixel in the array to a first voltage;

acquire a second family of images, wherein each image in the second family of images is a second image based on setting only those pixels in a subset of the array to a second voltage, the first voltage being different from the second voltage, the subset being less than an entirety of pixels in the array of pixels, and wherein each image in the second family of images is based on a different subset of pixels in the array; and

form a family of difference images, wherein each difference image in the family of difference images is formed based on a difference between one image in the first family of images and one image in the second family of images.

2. The system as set forth in claim 1 , where the family of subsets covers the array.

3. The system as set forth in claim 1 , wherein the first image is based on an average of voltage readouts by the controller based on setting the reset voltage of each pixel in the array to the first voltage, and the second image is based on an average of voltage readouts by the controller based on setting only those pixels in the subset of the array to the second voltage.

4. A system comprising:

an array of pixels; and

a controller coupled to the array of pixels, the controller configured to:

acquire a first family of images, wherein each image in the first family of images is a first image based on setting a reset voltage of each pixel in the array to a first voltage;

acquire a second family of images, wherein each image in the second family of images is a second image based on setting only those pixels in a subset of the array to a second voltage, the first voltage being different from the second voltage, and wherein each image in the second family of images is based on a different subset of pixels in the array;

acquire a first averaged image based on an average of images in the first family of images;

acquire a second averaged image based on an average of images in the second family of images; and

form an averaged difference image based on a difference between the first and second averaged images.

5. The system as set forth in claim 1 , the controller is further configured to perform calculation of one or more coupling factors between pixels in the array of pixels based on the family of difference images.

6. The system as set forth in claim 5 , wherein each coupling factor in the one or more coupling factors is between a particular pixel and at least one nearest neighbor or at least one next-to-nearest neighbor of the particular pixel.

7. The system as set forth in claim 5 , wherein the one or more coupling factors are capacitive coupling factors.

8. The system as set forth in claim 5 , wherein the perform calculation is selected from the group consisting of simulated annealing calculation methods, perturbation calculation methods, Green's function calculation methods, and matrix inversion calculation methods.

Assignments (3)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 10, 2010
From: SESHADRI, SURESH; COLE, DAVID; SMITH, ROGER M.; HANCOCK, BRUCE R.
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 024362/0643 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2010
From: SESHADRI, SURESH; COLE, DAVID; SMITH, ROGER M.; HANCOCK, BRUCE R.
To: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
Reel/Frame 024267/0919 →
CONFIRMATORY LICENSE Recorded Jun 30, 2008
From: CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
To: NASA
Reel/Frame 021187/0302 →