IP Library Granted Patent US 9,898,656
Granted Patent B2
US 9,898,656 · App. 12/020,450 · Granted Feb 20, 2018

Systems and methods for identifying a contra-ictal condition in a subject

Inventors: David Snyder (Bainbridge Island, WA); Kent W. Leyde (Sammamish, WA); John F. Harris (Bellevue, WA)
Assignee: Cyberonics, Inc.
G06K9/00496A61B5/0482A61B5/4094G06F19/3443A61B5/0006A61B5/0476G06F19/24G06F19/30G06F19/345G06F19/3418
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 9,898,656
App. No.
12/020,450
Granted
Feb 20, 2018
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention provides a method of monitoring a subject's neurological condition. In some embodiments, the method includes the steps of analyzing a physiological signal (such as an EEG) from a subject to determine if the subject is in a contra-ictal condition; and if the subject is in a contra-ictal condition, providing an indication (e.g., to the subject and/or to a caregiver) that the subject is in the contra-ictal condition, such as by activating a green light or other visible output. In some embodiments, if the subject is in a pro-ictal condition, the method includes the step of providing an indication (such as a red light) that the subject is in the pro-ictal condition. The invention also provides neurological system monitors.

Claims (51)

1. A method of identifying a contra-ictal status of a subject, the method comprising:

obtaining, by one or more physiological sensors, an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal dataset from the subject;

using a processor to complete steps of:

generating an N-dimensional feature vector for each of different time points of the EEG signal dataset;

identifying a grouping of contra-ictal feature vectors that is substantially free of pro-ictal feature vectors, wherein the contra-ictal feature vectors are associated with a low susceptibility of having a seizure and the pro-ictal feature vectors are associated with high susceptibility of having a seizure;

identifying a grouping of pro-ictal feature vectors that is substantially free of contra-ictal feature vectors;

using the grouping of contra-ictal feature vectors to provide an output associated with a contra-ictal status and using the grouping of pro-ictal feature vectors to provide an output associated with a pro-ictal status;

comparing the contra-ictal output to at least one threshold to determine a contra-ictal state;

comparing the pro-ictal output to at least one threshold to determine a pro-ictal state;

selecting an indicator from among at least three indicators based on the contra-ictal state and the pro-ictal state, each of the at least three indicators corresponding to a different susceptibility of having a seizure, wherein the selected indicator indicates whether the subject has the contra-ictal status; and

displaying, by a seizure advisory system, the selected indicator.

2. The method of claim 1 further comprising storing the identified grouping of contra-ictal feature vectors or a mathematical representation of the identified grouping of contra-ictal feature vectors in memory.

3. The method of claim 1 further comprising customizing a contra-ictal algorithm for the subject based on the N-dimensional feature vector and the processor using the customized contra-ictal algorithm.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the displaying of the indicator includes a report that a seizure is unlikely to occur for a time period.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the time period is at least one of 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, greater than 5 minutes, greater than 15 minutes, greater than 30 minutes, greater than 60 minutes, and greater than 90 minutes.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the indicator is the identification of the contra-ictal status of the subject and corresponds to a time period that the subject is estimated to remain in the contra-ictal status.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the time period is at least one of 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, greater than 5 minutes, greater than 15 minutes, greater than 30 minutes, greater than 60 minutes, and greater than 90 minutes.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein selecting the indicator comprises:

selecting a first indicator of the at least three indicators in response to the contra-ictal output being above at least one threshold and the pro-ictal output being below at least one threshold, the first indicator corresponding to a low susceptibility of having a seizure;

selecting a second indicator of the at least three indicators in response to the contra-ictal output being below at least one threshold and the pro-ictal output being above at least one threshold, the second indicator corresponding to a high susceptibility of having a seizure;

selecting a third indicator of the at least three indicators in response to the contra-ictal output being below at least one threshold and the pro-ictal output being below at least one threshold, the third indicator corresponding to neither the contra-ictal state nor the pro-ictal state; and

selecting the third indicator of the at least three indicators in response to the contra-ictal output being above at least one threshold and the pro-ictal output being above at least one threshold.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the first indicator is a green light, the second indicator is a red light, and the third indicator is a yellow light.

10. A method of identifying a contra-ictal status of a subject, the method comprising:

obtaining, by one or more physiological sensors, an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal dataset from the subject, the EEG signal dataset including contra-ictal data corresponding to a contra-ictal status of the subject in which the subject has a low susceptibility of having a seizure for a time period, the EEG signal dataset further including pro-ictal data corresponding to a pro-ictal status of the subject in which the subject has a high susceptibility of having a seizure;

using a processor to complete steps of:

distinguishing the contra-ictal data from the pro-ictal data within the EEG signal dataset;

providing an output associated with the contra-ictal status and providing an output associated with the pro-ictal status based on the distinguished data;

comparing the contra-ictal output to at least one threshold to determine a contra-ictal state;

comparing the pro-ictal output to at least one threshold to determine a pro-ictal state;

selecting an indicator from among at least three indicators based on the contra-ictal state and the pro-ictal state, each of the at least three indicators corresponding to a different susceptibility of having a seizure, wherein the selected indicator indicates whether the subject has the contra-ictal status;

displaying, by a seizure advisory system, the selected indicator; and

reporting, by the processor, the contra-ictal status of the subject.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the time period is at least one of 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, greater than 5 minutes, greater than 15 minutes, greater than 30 minutes, greater than 60 minutes, and greater than 90 minutes.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the reporting is to the subject or a care provider of the subject.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the reporting includes reporting the time period.

14. The method of claim 13 , wherein the time period is at least one of 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, greater than 5 minutes, greater than 15 minutes, greater than 30 minutes, greater than 60 minutes, and greater than 90 minutes.

15. The method of claim 10 , further comprising:

providing a therapeutic response to the subject.

16. A method of identifying a contra-ictal status of a subject, the method comprising:

obtaining, by one or more physiological sensors, an electroencephalogram (EEG) signal dataset from the subject, the EEG signal dataset corresponding to a normal non-seizure status of the subject;

using a processor to complete steps of:

distinguishing contra-ictal data from pro-ictal data within the EEG signal dataset, wherein the contra-ictal data is associated with a low susceptibility of having a seizure and the pro-ictal data is associated with a high susceptibility of having a seizure;

in response to distinguishing the contra-ictal data from the pro-ictal data, providing an output associated with a contra-ictal status for a time period and providing an output associated with a pro-ictal status for the time period, the time period being a future period of time;

comparing the contra-ictal output to at least one threshold to determine a contra-ictal state for the time period;

comparing the pro-ictal output to at least one threshold to determine a pro-ictal state for the time period;

selecting an indicator from among at least three indicators based on the contra-ictal state and the pro-ictal state, each of the at least three indicators corresponding to a different susceptibility of having a seizure for the time period, wherein the selected indicator indicates whether the subject has the contra-ictal status; and

displaying, by a seizure advisory system, the selected indicator.

17. The method of claim 16 , wherein the time period is at least one of 5 minutes, 10 minutes, 15 minutes, 20 minutes, 30 minutes, 60 minutes, 90 minutes, greater than 5 minutes, greater than 15 minutes, greater than 30 minutes, greater than 60 minutes, and greater than 90 minutes.

18. The method of claim 16 , further comprising:

providing a therapeutic response to the subject.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 20, 2021
From: ACF FINCO I LP
To: LIVANOVA USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 057552/0378 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2021
From: LIVANOVA USA, INC.
To: GOLDMAN SACHS BANK USA, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057188/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 16, 2021
From: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS AGENT FOR THE LENDERS
To: LIVANOVA USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 057189/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 30, 2020
From: LIVANOVA USA, INC.
To: ACF FINCO I LP, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 054881/0784 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 17, 2020
From: LIVANOVA USA, INC.
To: ARES CAPITAL CORPORATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 053673/0675 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 10, 2013
From: NEUROVISTA CORPORATION
To: CYBERONICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 030192/0408 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Sep 14, 2012
From: NEUROVISTA CORPORATION
To: CYBERONICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028959/0395 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2008
From: SNYDER, DAVID; LEYDE, KENT W.; HARRIS, JOHN F.
To: NEUROVISTA CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 020698/0325 →
Continuity (2)
Provisional Application 60897549 · Jan 25, 2007
Related Publication 20080183096A1 · Jul 31, 2008