IP Library Granted Patent US 7,768,729
Granted Patent B2
US 7,768,729 · App. 12/023,980 · Granted Aug 3, 2010

Method, system, and computer program product for estimating adjacent track erasure risk by determining erase band width growth rates

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,768,729
App. No.
12/023,980
Granted
Aug 3, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method according to one embodiment comprises determining a growth rate of an erase band width between an aggressor track and a substantially unerased portion of a data track on a magnetic medium during a first number of write cycles on the aggressor track; and estimating the erase band width, or derived parameter thereof, for or after a second number of write cycles on the aggressor track, the second number of write cycles being greater than the first number of write cycles.

Claims (85)

1. A method, comprising:

determining a growth rate of an erase band width between an aggressor track and a substantially unerased portion of a data track on a magnetic medium during a first number of write cycles on the aggressor track; and

estimating the erase band width, or derived parameter thereof, for or after a second number of write cycles on the aggressor track, the second number of write cycles being greater than the first number of write cycles.

2. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the first number of write cycles is less than about 1000.

3. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the second number of write cycles is greater than about 10000.

4. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the first number of write cycles is less than about 100.

5. A method as recited in claim 4 , wherein the second number of write cycles is greater than about 10000.

6. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the estimating is based on a log linear extrapolation of the determined growth of the erase band width.

7. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein a derived parameter of the erase band width is estimated, wherein the derived parameter is an approximate number of write cycles on the aggressor track before erasure is detectable in the data track.

8. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising selecting a track pitch based on the estimating.

9. A method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the growth rate of the erase band width further comprises writing the data track and the aggressor track, and measuring the erase band width after at least two different write cycles on the aggressor track.

10. A method as recited in claim 9 , wherein the growth rate of the erase band width is determined using the equation:

R

=

EBW

y

-

EBW

x

log

10

(

y

)

-

log

10

(

x

)

where R is the rate growth of the erase band width,

EBW x s the erase band width after x write cycles, and

EBW y is the erase band width after y write cycles.

11. A method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising determining corrected track pitch using the equation:

TP corr =TP−+ R *log 10 (number of write cycles)

where TP corr is the correct track pitch,

TP is a track pitch between the aggressor track and the substantially unerased portion of the data track during the first number of write cycles, and

R is the growth rate of the erase band width.

12. A method, comprising:

estimating an erase band width, or derived parameter thereof, adjacent an aggress track for a third number of write cycles on the aggressor track based on a log linear growth rate of the erase band width between first and second numbers of write cycles on the aggressor track,

wherein the third number of write cycles is greater than the first number of write cycles,

wherein the third number of write cycles is greater than the second numbers of write cycles.

13. A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the second number of write cycles is less than about 1000, wherein the first number of write cycles is less than the second number of write cycles.

14. A method as recited in claim 13 , wherein the third number of write cycles is greater than about 10000.

15. A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the second number of write cycles is less than about 100, wherein the first number of write cycles is less than the second number of write cycles.

16. A method as recited in claim 15 , wherein the third number of write cycles is greater than about 10000.

17. A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein the estimating is based on a log linear extrapolation of the determined growth of the erase band width.

18. A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein a derived parameter of the erase band width is estimated, wherein the derived parameter is an approximate number of write cycles on the aggressor track before erasure is detectable in the data track.

19. A method as recited in claim 12 , further comprising, selecting, a track pitch based on the estimating.

20. A method as recited in claim 12 , wherein determining the growth rate of the erase band width further comprises writing the data track and the aggressor track, and measuring the erase band width after at least two different write cycles on the aggressor track.

21. A method as recited in claim 20 , wherein the growth rate of the erase band width is determined using the equation:

R

=

EBW

y

-

EBW

x

log

(

y

)

-

log

(

x

)

where R is the rate of growth of the erase band width,

EBW x is the erase band width after x write cycles, and

EBW y is the erase band width after y write cycles.

22. A method as recited in claim 12 , further comprising determining a corrected track pitch using the equation:

TP corr =TP+ R *log 10 (number of write cycles)

where TP corr is the corrected track pitch,

TP is a track pitch between the aggressor track and the substantially unerased portion of the data track during the first number of write cycles, and

R is the growth rate of the erase band width.

23. A system, comprising:

logic or software for determining a growth rate of an erase band width between an aggressor track and a substantially unerased portion of a data track on a magnetic medium during a first number of write cycles on the aggressor track; and

logic or software for estimating the erase band width, or derived parameter thereof, for or after a second number of write cycles on the aggressor track, the second number of write cycles being greater than the first number of write cycles.

24. A computer program product embodied on a computer readable medium which when executed causes a computer to perform the following operations, comprising:

determining a growth rate of an erase band width between an aggressor track and a substantially unerased portion of a data track on a magnetic medium during a first number of write cycles on the aggressor track; and

estimating the erase band width, or derived parameter thereof, for or after a second number of write cycles on the aggressor track, the second number of write cycles being greater than the first number of write cycles.

Assignments (4)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL 052915 FRAME 0566 Recorded Feb 8, 2022
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 059127/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 6, 2020
From: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 052915/0566 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2016
From: HGST NETHERLANDS B.V.
To: WESTERN DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 040826/0821 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 25, 2012
From: HITACHI GLOBAL STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES NETHERLANDS B.V.
To: HGST NETHERLANDS B.V.
Reel/Frame 029341/0777 →