IP Library Patent Application 12030073
Patent Application
App. No. 12/030,073

System and Method for Generating Revenues in a Retail Commodity Network

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
12/030,073
Abstract

Embodiments disclosed herein provide viable revenue models for a service provider that offers price protection on a retail commodity to businesses as well as individual consumers in a retail commodity network. Specifically, embodiments disclosed offer a plurality of revenue flows in which the cost incurred by a service provider to offer hedge positions associated with a retail commodity can be offset in a variety of ways to cover the operating expenses and generate realistic profits. In some embodiments, a revenue model for a service provider in a retail commodity network may be built depending upon whether hedging cost information is generated internally or obtained externally. Such cost may be passed on to a customer entirely, none at all, or somewhere in between. Embodiments disclosed herein further provide a plurality of revenue sources and ways to generate revenues therefrom.

Claims (32)

1 . A method for generating revenues in a retail commodity network, comprising:

generating or obtaining hedge cost information as input to a revenue model, wherein the hedge cost information includes costs associated with hedging a commodity on a wholesale basis;

determining whether to pass none, some, or all of the costs to a customer, wherein the customer is an individual user or a commercial entity;

engaging one or more revenue sources specified in the revenue model; and

aggregating a total net revenue per unit of the commodity from the one or more revenue sources.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the commodity is gasoline.

3 . The method of claim 2 , wherein the hedge cost information contain a matrix of strike prices and a matrix of insurance prices corresponding to the strike prices.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein each of the insurance prices represents a hedge cost per gallon for insuring against a risk of the customer depleting a virtual gas tank of the gasoline when retail prices of the gasoline exceed the customer's lock price.

5 . The method of claim 4 , further comprising warehousing and managing the risk.

6 . The method of claim 5 , further comprising laying off the risk on an open market.

7 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the matrix of strike prices contains a plurality of parameters including strike prices for fuel grade per gallon, sensitivities, location, and duration.

8 . The method of claim 3 , further comprising determining an amount of the insurance prices to be passed on to the customer.

9 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a range of strike prices tailored for the customer, wherein each of the strike prices corresponds to a certain percentage of price protection coverage for the commodity.

10 . A computer-readable medium carrying program instructions executable by a processor to perform:

generating hedge cost information as input to a revenue model, wherein the hedge cost information includes costs associated with hedging an energy commodity on a wholesale basis and wherein the revenue model specifies one or more revenue sources;

determining whether to pass none, some, or all of the costs to a customer, wherein the customer is an individual user or a commercial entity; and

aggregating a total net revenue per unit of the energy commodity from the one or more revenue sources.

11 . The computer-readable medium of claim 10 , wherein the energy commodity is fuel.

12 . The computer-readable medium of claim 11 , wherein the hedge cost information contain a matrix of strike prices and a matrix of insurance prices corresponding to the strike prices.

13 . The computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein each of the insurance prices represents a hedge cost per gallon for insuring against a risk of the customer depleting a virtual gas tank of the fuel when retail prices of the fuel exceed the customer's lock price.

14 . The computer-readable medium of claim 13 , wherein the program instructions are further executable by the processor to perform warehousing and managing the risk.

15 . The computer-readable medium of claim 12 , wherein the matrix of strike prices contains a plurality of parameters including strike prices for fuel grade per gallon, sensitivities, locations and duration.

16 . The computer-readable medium of claim 15 , wherein the program instructions are further executable by the processor to determine an amount of the insurance prices to be passed on to the customer.

17 . A system comprising:

a processor;

a computer-readable medium carrying program instructions executable by the processor to perform:

generating hedge cost information as input to a revenue model, wherein the hedge cost information includes costs associated with hedging a commodity on a wholesale basis and wherein the revenue model specifies one or more revenue sources;

determining whether to pass none, some, or all of the costs to a customer, wherein the customer is an individual user or a commercial entity; and

aggregating a total net revenue per unit of the commodity from the one or more revenue sources.

18 . The system of claim 17 , wherein the hedge cost information contain a matrix of strike prices and a matrix of insurance prices corresponding to the strike prices.

19 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the commodity is fuel, wherein each of the insurance prices represents a hedge cost per gallon for insuring against a risk of the customer depleting a virtual tank of the fuel when retail prices of the fuel exceed the customer's lock price.

20 . The system of claim 18 , wherein the matrix of strike prices contains a plurality of parameters including strike prices for fuel grade per gallon, sensitivities, location, and duration.

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 23, 2009
From: FELL, ROBERT M.; PAINTER, SCOTT; BONSIGNORE, MICHAEL R.; REED, BRIAN P.; MAGNUSON, GARY A.; GROS, THOMAS D.
To: PRICELOCK, INC.
Reel/Frame 022308/0374 →