IP Library Granted Patent US 7,865,322
Granted Patent B2
US 7,865,322 · App. 12/102,537 · Granted Jan 4, 2011

Relative noise

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,865,322
App. No.
12/102,537
Granted
Jan 4, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Relative noise is a single scalar value that is used to predict the maximum value of the expected noise at any point and is calculated from the measured signal and a mathematical noise model. The mathematical noise model is selected or estimated from an observation that includes statistical and/or numerical modeling based on a population of measurement points. An absolute noise for a plurality of points of the measured signal is estimated. An array of values is calculated by dividing each of a plurality of points of the absolute noise by a corresponding expected noise value calculated from the mathematical noise model. The relative noise is calculated by taking a standard deviation of a plurality of points of the array. The relative noise can be used to calculate scaled background signal noise, filter regions, denoise data, detect false positives from features, calculate S/N, and determine a stop condition for acquiring data.

Claims (76)

1. A method for calculating a relative noise of a measured signal, comprising:

selecting a mathematical noise model;

estimating an absolute noise for a plurality of points of the measured signal;

calculating a plurality of expected noise values from the mathematical noise model for each of the plurality of points;

calculating an array of values by dividing each of a plurality of points of the absolute noise by a corresponding expected noise value from the plurality of expected noise values; and

calculating the relative noise by taking a standard deviation of a plurality of points of the array.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mathematical noise model is selected based on knowledge about a data acquisition process of the measured signal.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mathematical noise model is selected based on an observation made from the measured signal.

4. The method of claim 1 , further comprising estimating an underlying signal from the measured signal.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the absolute noise is estimated by subtracting the underlying signal from the measured signal.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the underlying signal is obtained by smoothing the measured signal.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein the underlying signal is obtained by applying a noise filter to the measured signal.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein the absolute noise is estimated by applying a filter to the measured signal.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein an underlying signal is estimated by subtracting the absolute noise from the measured signal.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

predicting an expected noise using the mathematical noise model and a signal; and

calculating a scaled noise by multiplying the expected noise by the relative noise.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the signal comprises an underlying signal.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein the signal comprises a signal of interest.

13. The method of claim 10 , wherein the signal comprises the measured signal.

14. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating a background signal;

predicting an expected background signal noise using the mathematical noise model and the background signal; and

calculating a scaled background signal noise by multiplying the expected background signal noise by the relative noise.

15. The method of claim 14 , further comprising determining if a region of a signal includes a signal of interest by:

comparing a sum of a background signal value of the background signal in the region and a scaled background signal noise value of the scaled background signal noise in the region with a signal value of the signal in the region; and

if the signal value is greater than the sum, determining that the region comprises the signal of interest.

16. The method of claim 15 , wherein the signal comprises the measured signal.

17. The method of claim 15 , wherein the signal comprises an underlying signal.

18. The method of claim 14 , further comprising determining if a first feature of a signal and an adjacent second feature of the signal are analyzed together by:

selecting a point of the signal that is between the first feature and the second feature;

comparing a sum of a background signal value of the background signal at the point and a scaled background signal noise value of the scaled background signal noise at the point with a signal value of the signal at the point; and

if the signal value is greater than the sum, analyzing the first feature and the second feature together.

19. The method of claim 18 , wherein the first feature comprises a first group of neighboring data points in the signal and the second feature comprises a second group of neighboring data points in the signal.

20. The method of claim 18 , wherein the signal comprises liquid chromatography mass spectrometry data.

21. The method of claim 18 , wherein the signal comprises image data.

22. The method of claim 18 , wherein the signal comprises a mass spectrum.

23. The method of claim 18 , wherein the signal comprises a chromatogram.

24. The method of claim 18 , wherein the signal comprises the measured signal.

25. The method of claim 18 , wherein the signal comprises an underlying signal.

26. The method of claim 14 , further comprising determining if a second feature of a signal is a separate feature and not part of an adjacent first feature of the signal by:

estimating a first feature signal using the first feature, the signal, and a mathematical model for a feature;

predicting an expected first feature noise using the mathematical noise model, the first feature signal, and the background signal;

calculating a scaled first feature noise by multiplying the expected first feature noise by the relative noise;

comparing a sum of a background signal value of the background signal at the second feature, a first feature signal value of the first feature signal at the second feature, and a scaled first feature noise value of the scaled first feature noise at the second feature with a signal value of the signal at the second feature; and

if the signal value is greater than the sum, determining that the second feature comprises the separate feature.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the signal comprises the measured signal.

28. The method of claim 26 , wherein the signal comprises an underlying signal.

29. The method of claim 14 , further comprising denoising a point of a signal by:

comparing a scaled background signal noise value of the scaled background signal noise at the point with a difference between a signal value of the signal at the point and a background signal value of the background signal at the point;

if the difference is smaller than the scaled background signal noise value, assigning a value of zero to the point;

if the difference exceeds the scaled background signal noise value by a value greater than zero but less than a threshold, assigning a product of the difference and a multiplier to the point; and

if the difference exceeds the scaled background signal noise value by a value greater than or equal to the threshold, assigning the difference to the point.

30. The method of claim 29 , wherein the signal comprises the measured signal.

31. The method of claim 29 , wherein the signal comprises an underlying signal.

32. The method of claim 14 , further comprising calculating a signal-to-noise ratio at a point of a signal by:

dividing a difference between a signal value of the signal at the point and a background signal value of the background signal at the point by a product of the relative noise and a noise value at the point.

33. The method of claim 32 , wherein the noise value comprises an underlying signal noise value.

34. The method of claim 32 , wherein the noise value comprises a background signal noise value.

35. The method of claim 32 , further comprising:

if the signal-to-noise ratio is greater than or equal to a threshold signal-to-noise ratio, stopping acquisition of the measured signal.

36. The method of claim 32 , further comprising:

if the relative noise is less than or equal to a threshold signal-to-noise ratio, stopping acquisition of the measured signal.

37. A non-transitory computer-readable medium containing computer instructions stored therein, for calculating a relative noise of a measured signal, causing a computer processor to perform:

selecting a mathematical noise model;

estimating an absolute noise for a plurality of points of the measured signal;

calculating a plurality of expected noise values from the mathematical noise model for each of the plurality of points;

calculating an array of values by dividing each of a plurality of points of the absolute noise by a corresponding expected noise value from the plurality of expected noise values; and

calculating the relative noise by taking a standard deviation of a plurality of points of the array.

38. A computing system for calculating a relative noise of a measured signal, comprising:

a computer processor programmed to calculate the relative noise of the measured signal that, when executed by the computer processor:

selects a mathematical noise model,

estimates an absolute noise for a plurality of points of the measured signal,

calculates a plurality of expected noise values from the mathematical noise model for each of the plurality of points,

calculates an array of values by dividing each of a plurality of points of the absolute noise by a corresponding expected noise value from the plurality of expected noise values, and

calculates the relative noise by taking a standard deviation of a plurality of points of the array.

Assignments (9)
LIEN RELEASE Recorded Apr 9, 2013
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 030182/0677 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 13, 2010
From: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS (CANADA) LIMITED
To: DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 024225/0092 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 12, 2010
From: MDS INC.
To: DH TECHNOLOGIES DEVELOPMENT PTE. LTD.
Reel/Frame 024218/0603 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 31, 2010
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 024160/0955 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 26, 2009
From: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
To: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS (CANADA) LIMITED
Reel/Frame 023575/0826 →
MERGER Recorded Oct 16, 2009
From: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC.
To: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
Reel/Frame 023381/0109 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Oct 16, 2009
From: APPLERA CORPORATION
To: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS INC
Reel/Frame 023381/0231 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 8, 2008
From: APPLIED BIOSYSTEMS, LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 021940/0920 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 14, 2008
From: IVOSEV, GORDANA; BONNER, RONALD; YANG, MIN
To: APPLERA CORPORATION; MDS ANALYTICAL TECHNOLOGIES
Reel/Frame 020800/0682 →