IP Library Granted Patent US 7,764,383
Granted Patent B1
US 7,764,383 · App. 12/133,538 · Granted Jul 27, 2010

Adaptively determining the sign in a fringe count detection system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,764,383
App. No.
12/133,538
Granted
Jul 27, 2010
Kind
B1
Abstract

A method includes extracting phase due to fringe count error (FCE) in spectra formed by an interferometer. The exemplary method includes the steps of: (a) forming an earth scene spectrum; (b) forming a background reference spectrum; and (c) forming a phase extraction function, R k , where k is a k th channel of the interferometer. The phase extraction function is formed from the earth scene spectrum and background reference spectrum. The method may also include the steps of (d) using recursive least squares (RLS) to extract phase from the R k function; and (e) providing the extracted phase to a user to correct the FCE. Step (c) may include forming a term in the R k function that includes a positive or a negative sign of a square root. Step (d) may include determining whether the sign is negative or positive using the RLS.

Claims (70)

1. A method of extracting phase due to fringe count error (FCE) in spectra formed by an interferometer, comprising the steps of:

(a) forming an earth scene spectrum

(b) forming a background reference spectrum;

(c) forming a phase extraction function, R k , where k is a k th channel of the interferometer, using the formed earth scene spectrum and the background spectrum;

(d) using recursive least squares (RLS) to extract phase from the R k function, and

(e) providing the extracted phase to a user to correct the FCE.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein

step (c) includes forming a term in the R k function that includes a positive or a negative sign of a square root; and

step (d) includes determining whether the sign is negative or positive using the RLS.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein step (d) includes

extrapolating a phase at channel k to a phase at channel k+1 using the RLS,

determining a first phase at channel k+1 resulting from using a positive sign of the square root in the phase extraction function,

determining a second phase at channel k+1 resulting from using a negative sign of the square root in the phase extraction function, and

selecting one of the determined first or second phase at channel k+1, based on the determined first or second phase that minimizes an absolute error to the extrapolated phase.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein step (d) includes

determining at least one value of phase at a first frequency, where the first frequency is a frequency operating at channel k=0 of the interferometer; and

extrapolating the determined value of phase to a next frequency operating at channel k=1 of the interferometer.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein extrapolating the determined value of phase, includes

determining a first value of phase at channel k=0 assuming a positive sign in the square root of the phase extraction function and extrapolating the first value of phase to a next channel, k=1, of the interferometer; and

determining a second value of the phase at channel k=0 assuming a negative sign in the square root of the phase extraction function and extrapolating the second value of phase to the next channel, k=1, of the interferometer.

6. The method of claim 5 , wherein

extrapolating the first and second value of phases includes performing a separate RLS over a bandwidth of k frequencies to obtain, respectively, first and second sets of adaptive phases, and

selecting one of the first and second sets of adaptive phases that satisfies a predetermined rule.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein selecting one of the first and second sets of adaptive phases includes

selecting one of the first or second sets of adaptive phases that satisfies the following equality:

[the sign of a median phase in the set of adaptive phases]=[the sign of a mean phase slope in the set of adaptive phases].

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein

step (d) includes using the RLS to determine a line having a positive or negative slope, where the line represents phases at k frequencies, and the slope of the line represents a number of fringe errors.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein

the number of fringe errors is proportional to the slope of the line, and a horizontal line represents no fringe error.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein forming the spectra in steps (a) and (b) includes

obtaining interferograms, and

performing a fast Fourier transform (FFT) on each of the interferograms to obtain a respective spectrum.

11. In a phase extraction function of an interferometer at channel number k, where the phase extraction function includes a square root sign that is either positive or negative,

a method of determining whether the sign is positive or negative, comprising the steps of:

RLS-computing a first set of phases as a function of channel number k, using the phase extraction function, assuming a positive square root sign beginning at k=0;

RLS-computing a second set of phases as a function of channel number k, using the phase extraction function, assuming a negative square root sign beginning at k=0; and

selecting the first or second set of phases based on a predetermined rule; and

providing the selected first or second set of phases to a user for correcting fringe count errors (FCE) of the interferometer.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein

selecting the first or second set of phases is based on the following sub-steps:

separately determining a sign of a median phase in the first and second sets of phases;

separately determining a sign of a mean phase slope in the first and second sets of phases; and

selecting the first or second set of phases satisfying the following equality:

the sign of the median phase=the sign of the mean phase slope.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein RLS-computing includes

extrapolating phase from channel k to channel k+1, assuming a positive square root sign;

extrapolating phase from channel k to channel k+1, assuming a negative square root sign; and

selecting the extrapolated phase in channel k+1 that minimizes an absolute error to the extrapolated phase.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein

the RLS-computing includes calculating phase values as a function of frequency,

wherein the phase values as a function of frequency is a straight line plotted on X,Y axes having a Y-intercept at k=0.

15. The method of claim 11 , wherein

the phase extraction function includes earth scene, and calibration spectra.

16. A computer for executing an algorithm for determining fringe count error (FCE) of an interferometer comprising the steps of:

forming a phase extraction function from earth scene and calibration spectra, where the phase extraction function varies with frequency and includes a square root sign that is either positive or negative at each frequency; and

determining whether the square root sign is positive or negative at each frequency using an RLS method.

17. The computer of claim 16 , including the steps of:

letting the square root sign be positive at a starting frequency, and calculating a first set of phases as a function of frequency;

letting the square root sign be negative at the starting frequency, and calculating a second set of phases as a function of frequency; and

selecting the first or second set of phases based on a predetermined rule.

18. The computer of claim 17 , wherein

selecting the first or second set of phases is based on satisfying the following equality for each set of phases:

sign of the median phase=sign of the mean phase slope.

19. The computer of claim 16 , wherein using the RLS method includes

extrapolating phase from frequency k to frequency k+1, assuming a positive square root sign;

extrapolating phase from frequency k to frequency k+1, assuming a negative square root sign; and

selecting the extrapolated phase at frequency k+1 that minimizes an absolute error to the extrapolated phase.

20. The computer of claim 16 , including

correcting the FCE using an FCE correction algorithm.

Assignments (3)
MERGER Recorded Jul 1, 2016
From: EXELIS INC.
To: HARRIS CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 039362/0534 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 27, 2012
From: ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES, INC.)
To: EXELIS, INC.
Reel/Frame 027604/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2008
From: HOLEVA, LEE F.
To: ITT MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISES, INC.
Reel/Frame 021052/0587 →