IP Library Granted Patent US 8,755,420
Granted Patent B2
US 8,755,420 · App. 12/137,452 · Granted Jun 17, 2014

Failure protection apparatus and system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,755,420
App. No.
12/137,452
Granted
Jun 17, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A safety and interlock circuit for use with devices which could cause injury if an error condition causes improper operation. A control program executing on a processor monitors a variety of device conditions, including pulse over-duration threshold, diode over-current threshold, pulse lock-out duration, temperature threshold, and pulse repetition frequency limit, and prevents the laser from firing if an error condition is detected. In addition, the error conditions are logged in a persistent memory to facilitate subsequent diagnosis and correction.

Claims (67)

1. A circuit for limiting the operation of a laser-based device comprising:

at least one laser diode,

one or more safety circuits that detect fault conditions associated with laser pulses emitted by the at least one laser diode according to one or more pulse emission parameters, including at least one of: (a) a current limit circuit configured to detect an over-current fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses, (b) a pulsewidth, limit circuit configured to detect a pulse duration fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses, and (c) a pulse repetition frequency limit circuit configured to detect a pulse frequency fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses,

an interlock circuit responsive to any of the fault conditions associated with one or more emitted laser pulses for preventing the at least one laser diode from emitting a subsequent laser pulse or for terminating an ongoing laser pulse, and

a safety circuit testing system that alters at least one of the pulse emission parameters in order to test whether at least one of the safety circuits that detects fault conditions associated with laser pulses emitted by the at least one laser diode is operating properly, wherein the testing performed by the safety circuit testing system is performed without emitting a laser pulse and independent of any emission by the at least one laser diode.

2. The circuit of claim 1 further comprising control logic to cause the device to enter a fault mode further comprising a log for recording errors.

3. The circuit of claim 1 , wherein:

the current limit circuit detects an over-current fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the current limit circuit is operating properly, by:

lowering a current limit threshold below a current level required for generating a laser pulse,

requesting a laser pulse with a current above the lowered current limit threshold but below the current level required for generating a laser pulse, and

determining whether a notification signal is generated in response to the requested laser pulse current exceeding the lowered current limit threshold, wherein the notification signal is generated if the current limit circuit is working properly and not generated if the current limit circuit is not working properly.

4. The circuit of claim 1 , wherein:

the pulse width limit circuit detects a pulse duration fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the pulsewidth limit circuit is operating properly, by:

requesting a phantom laser pulse that does not trigger an actual laser pulse, the requesting a phantom laser pulse having a duration exceeding a preset pulsewidth threshold,

determining whether a notification signal is generated in response to the requested phantom laser pulse having a duration exceeding the preset pulsewidth threshold, wherein the notification signal is generated if the pulsewidth limit circuit is working properly and not generated if the pulsewidth limit circuit is not working properly.

5. The circuit of claim 1 , wherein:

the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit detects a pulse frequency fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit is operating properly, by:

generating a first signal to trigger a laser pulse, and a second signal to send zero current through the at least one laser diode, such that no laser pulse is actually emitted,

determining the duration of a pulse lock period following the triggered laser pulse,

determining whether the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit is operating properly based on the determined duration of the pulse lock period following the triggered laser pulse.

6. The circuit of claim 1 wherein the one or more pulse emission parameters include a signal for triggering a laser pulse and a current supplied to the at least one laser diode for generating a laser pulse.

7. A circuit for limiting the operation of a laser-based device comprising:

at least one laser diode,

one or more safety circuits that detect fault conditions associated with laser pulses emitted by the at least one laser diode according to one or more pulse emission parameters, including at least one of: (a) a pulsewidth limit circuit configured to detect a pulse duration fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses, and (b) a pulse repetition frequency limit circuit configured to detect a pulse frequency fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses,

an interlock circuit responsive to any of the fault conditions associated with one or more emitted laser pulses for preventing the at least one laser diode from emitting a subsequent laser pulse or for terminating an ongoing laser pulse, and

a safety circuit testing system that alters at least one of the pulse emission parameters in order to test whether at least one of the safety circuits that detects fault conditions associated with laser pulses emitted by the at least one laser diode is operating properly without supplying any current to the at least one laser diode.

8. The circuit of claim 7 , further comprising control logic to cause the device to enter a fault mode further comprising a log for recording errors.

9. The circuit of claim 7 , wherein:

the pulse width limit circuit detects a pulse duration fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the pulsewidth limit circuit is operating properly, by:

requesting a phantom laser pulse that does not trigger an actual laser pulse, the requesting a phantom laser pulse having a duration exceeding a preset pulsewidth threshold,

determining whether a notification signal is generated in response to the requested phantom laser pulse having a duration exceeding the preset pulsewidth threshold, wherein the notification signal is generated if the pulsewidth limit circuit is working properly and not generated if the pulsewidth limit circuit is not working properly.

10. The circuit of claim 7 , wherein;

the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit detects a pulse frequency fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit is operating properly, by:

generating a first signal to trigger a laser pulse, and a second signal to send zero current through the at least one laser diode, such that no laser pulse is actually emitted,

determining the duration of a pulse lock period following the triggered laser pulse,

determining whether the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit is operating properly based on the determined duration of the pulse lock period following the triggered laser pulse.

11. The circuit of claim 7 , wherein the one or more pulse emission parameters include a signal for triggering a laser pulse and a current supplied to the at least one laser diode for generating a laser pulse.

12. A battery-powered, laser-based treatment device, comprising:

at least one laser diode,

at least one battery configured to provide current to the at least one laser diode,

one or more safety circuits that detect fault conditions associated with laser pulses emitted by the at least one laser diode according to one or more pulse emission parameters, including at least one of: (a) a current limit circuit configured to detect an over-current fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses, (b) a pulsewidth limit circuit configured to detect a pulse duration fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses, and (c) a pulse repetition frequency limit circuit configured to detect a pulse frequency fault condition associated with one or more emitted laser pulses,

an interlock circuit responsive to any of the fault conditions associated with one or more emitted laser pulses for preventing the at least one laser diode from emitting a subsequent laser pulse or for terminating an ongoing laser pulse, and

a safety circuit testing system that alters at least one of the pulse emission parameters in order to test whether at least one of the safety circuits that detects fault conditions associated with laser pulses emitted by the at least one laser diode is operating properly, wherein the testing performed by the safety circuit testing system is performed without emitting a laser pulse and independent of any emission by the at least one laser diode.

13. The device of claim 12 , further comprising control logic to cause the device to enter a fault mode further comprising a log for recording errors.

14. The device of claim 12 , wherein:

the current limit circuit detects an over-current fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the current limit circuit is operating properly, by:

lowering a current limit threshold below a current level required for generating a laser pulse,

requesting a laser pulse with a current above the lowered current limit threshold but below the current level required for generating a laser pulse, and

determining whether a notification signal is generated in response to the requested laser pulse current exceeding the lowered current limit threshold, wherein the notification signal is generated if the current limit circuit is working properly and not generated if the current limit circuit is not working properly.

15. The device of claim 12 , wherein:

the pulse width limit circuit detects a pulse duration fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the pulsewidth limit circuit is operating properly, by:

requesting a phantom laser pulse that does not trigger an actual laser pulse, the requesting a phantom laser pulse having a duration exceeding a preset pulsewidth threshold,

determining whether a notification signal is generated in response to the requested phantom laser pulse having a duration exceeding the preset pulsewidth threshold, wherein the notification signal is generated if the pulsewidth limit circuit is working properly and not generated if the pulsewidth limit circuit is not working properly.

16. The device of claim 12 , wherein:

the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit detects a pulse frequency fault condition, and

the safety circuit testing system tests whether the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit is operating properly, by:

generating a first signal to trigger a laser pulse, and a second signal to send zero current through the at least one laser diode, such that no laser pulse is actually emitted,

determining the duration of a pulse lock period following the triggered laser pulse,

determining whether the pulse repetition frequency limit circuit is operating properly based on the determined duration of the pulse lock period following the triggered laser pulse.

17. The device of claim 12 , wherein the one or more pulse emission parameters include a signal for triggering a laser pulse and a current supplied to the at least one laser diode for generating a laser pulse.

Assignments (8)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE PATENT NUMBER FOR ONE PATENT IDENTIFIED IN THE DEED OF ASSIGNMENT. ONE PATENT ON THE TOP OF PAGE 3 WAS IDENTIFIED INCORRECTLY (THE CORRECT PATENT NUMBER IS 9687671, NOT 9687651). THE AMENDED DEED OF ASSIGNMENT CORRECTS THIS ERROR. ALSO ATTACHED TO THIS CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT IS THE PREVIOUSLY RECORDED COVER SHEET CONTAINING THE ERROR, PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 72121 FRAME 256. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST. Recorded Oct 20, 2025
From: CHANNEL INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: AESTHETE HOLDING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 073686/0429 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 26, 2025
From: CHANNEL INVESTMENTS, LLC
To: AESTHETE HOLDING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 072121/0256 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 3, 2017
From: TRIA BEAUTY, INC.
To: CHANNEL INVESTMENTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 042229/0195 →
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 3, 2013
From: TRIA BEAUTY, INC.
To: ATHYRIUM OPPORTUNITIES FUND (A) LP
Reel/Frame 030740/0215 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 021459 FRAME 0358. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE CHANGE OF NAME. Recorded Feb 3, 2012
From: SPECTRAGENICS, INC.
To: TRIA BEAUTY, INC. (CA)
Reel/Frame 027648/0544 →
MERGER Recorded Jan 20, 2012
From: TRIA BEAUTY, INC. (CA)
To: TRIA BEAUTY, INC. (DE)
Reel/Frame 027570/0856 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 28, 2008
From: GROVE, ROBERT E.; WECKWERTH, MARK V.; ISLAND, TOBIN C.; LIU, HARVEY I.
To: SPECTRAGENICS, INC.
Reel/Frame 021458/0872 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 28, 2008
From: GROVE, ROBERT E.; WECKWERTH, MARK V.; ISLAND, TOBIN C.; LIU, HARVEY I.
To: TRIA BEAUTY, INC.
Reel/Frame 021459/0358 →