IP Library Granted Patent US 8,228,804
Granted Patent B2
US 8,228,804 · App. 12/143,799 · Granted Jul 24, 2012

Tuning routing metrics to reduce maximum link utilization or provide failure resiliency

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,228,804
App. No.
12/143,799
Granted
Jul 24, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A metric tuning technique optimizes the maximum link utilization of a set of links incrementally. Changes to the metric are constrained to be metric increases to divert routes from select links, thereby minimizing the number of changes required to achieve the optimization by avoiding the potential cascade of changes caused by attracting routes to a link. An interactive user interface is provided to allow a user to specify limits and constraints, and to select the sets of links to be addressed, including, for example, only the links that exceed a given link utilization threshold, the links having the highest link utilizations, the links having the highest failure effect, and so on. This incremental optimization technique is also used to optimize network resiliency by minimizing the network degradation caused by the failure of one or more links.

Claims (55)

1. A method comprising:

identifying a first plurality of metric values of a metric parameter that is used by a routing protocol to select first routes for communication of messages among nodes of a network, each metric value being associated with a corresponding link of a plurality of links of the network,

determining, by a network analysis system, a plurality of failure effects based on modifications of the first routes by the routing protocol based on a plurality of hypothetical failure conditions,

selecting a hypothetical failure condition based on the plurality of failure effects

determining a first network performance measure based on the modification of the first routes by the routing protocol based on the selected hypothetical failure condition of a plurality of hypothetical failure conditions of the network, and

determining a second network performance measure based on a proposed second plurality of metric values and corresponding second routes based on the selected hypothetical failure condition of the plurality of hypothetical failure conditions and a modification of one or more select metric values of the first plurality of metric values, and

wherein:

each failure effect corresponds to a number of link utilizations that exceed a given threshold due to the corresponding hypothetical failure condition

the modification of the one or more select metric values is substantially limited to modifications that cause the routing protocol to reduce a number of routes that include the links corresponding to the modified metric values, and

if the second network performance is an improvement over the first network performance measure, identifying one or more configuration changes that will enable use of the proposed second plurality of metric values on the plurality of links of the network.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the improvement of the second network performance measure corresponds to a reduction in a number of link utilizations that exceed a first threshold due to the hypothetical failure condition.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the improvement of the second network performance measure corresponds to a reduction in a number of link utilizations that exceed a second threshold based on the first routes, without the hypothetical failure condition.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein the improvement of the second network performance measure corresponds to an elimination of link utilizations that exceed a second threshold based on the first routes, without the hypothetical failure condition.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the improvement of the second network performance measure corresponds to an elimination of link utilizations that exceed the second threshold due to the failure condition.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the first and second network performance measures correspond to a maximum of link utilizations of the plurality of links.

7. A system comprising:

a user interface that is configured to receive a link utilization threshold,

a routing tool that is configured to determine routes on a network based on a metric parameter and a corresponding first plurality of metric values of the metric parameter, each metric value being associated with a corresponding link of a plurality of links of the network,

a traffic engineering engine that is configured to perform the method of:

identifying a first plurality of metric values of a metric parameter that is used by the routing tool to select first routes for communication of messages among nodes of a network, each metric value being associated with a corresponding link of a plurality of links of the network,

determining, a plurality of failure effects based on modifications of the first routes by the routing tool based on a plurality of hypothetical failure conditions,

selecting a hypothetical failure condition based on the plurality of failure effects

determining a first network performance measure based on the modification of the first routes by the routing protocol based on the selected hypothetical failure condition of the network,

determining a second network performance measure based on a proposed second plurality of metric values and corresponding second routes based on the selected hypothetical failure condition and a modification of one or more select metric values of the first plurality of metric values,

wherein:

each failure effect corresponds to a number of link utilizations that exceed the link utilization threshold due to the corresponding hypothetical failure condition

the modification of the one or more select metric values is substantially limited to modifications that cause the routing protocol to reduce a number of routes that include the links corresponding to the modified metric values, and,

if the second network performance measure is an improvement over the first network performance measure, identifying one or more configuration changes that will enable use of the proposed second plurality of metric values on the plurality of links of the network.

8. The system of claim 7 , wherein the first and second network performance measures include a number of the violations.

9. The system of claim 7 , wherein the improvement includes a reduction in a maximum of link utilization among the plurality of links.

10. The system of claim 7 , wherein the traffic engineering engine is configured to modify the one or more select metric values by:

selecting a candidate link having a link utilization that exceeds the link utilization threshold,

determining a new value of the select metric value corresponding to the candidate link to achieve a new link utilization that does not exceed the link utilization threshold, and

setting the select metric value to the new value.

11. The system of claim 10 , wherein the traffic engineering engine is configured to:

identify each of a set of metric values of the candidate link that provide a reduction of the link utilization for the candidate link, and

determine the new value includes selecting from the set of metric values.

12. The system of claim 7 , wherein the traffic engineering engine is configured to:

determine a third network performance measure based on a modification of the second routes by the routing protocol based on a hypothetical failure condition of the network, and

determine a fourth network performance measure based on a proposed third plurality of metric values and corresponding third routes based on modification of one or more other select metric values of the second plurality of metric values, and,

if the fourth network performance measure is an improvement over the third network performance measure, identify one or more other configuration changes that will enable use of the proposed third plurality of metric values on the plurality of links of the network.

13. A system comprising:

a routing tool that is configured to determine routes on a network based on a metric parameter and corresponding first plurality of metric values of the metric parameter, each metric value being associated with a corresponding link of a plurality of links of the network,

a traffic engineering engine that is configured to perform the method of:

identifying a first plurality of metric values of a metric parameter that is used by the routing tool to select first routes for communication of messages among nodes of a network, each metric value being associated with a corresponding link of a plurality of links of the network,

determining a plurality of failure effects based on modifications of the first routes by the routing tool based on a plurality of hypothetical failure conditions,

selecting a hypothetical failure condition based on the plurality of failure effects

determining a first network performance measure based on the modification of the first routes by the routing tool based on the selected hypothetical failure condition of the network, and

determining a second network performance measure based on a proposed second plurality of metric values and corresponding second routes based on the selected hypothetical failure condition and a modification of one or more select metric values of the first plurality of metric values,

wherein:

each failure effect corresponds to a number of link utilizations that exceed a given threshold due to the corresponding hypothetical failure condition

the modification of the one or more select metric values is substantially limited to modifications that cause the routing protocol to reduce a number of routes that include the links corresponding to the modified metric values, and

if the second network performance measure is an improvement over the first network performance measure, identifying one or more configuration changes that will enable use of the proposed second plurality of metric values on the plurality of links of the network.

14. The system of claim 13 , wherein the improvement of the second network performance measure corresponds to an elimination of link utilizations that exceed a given threshold due to the failure condition.

15. The system of claim 13 , wherein the first and second network performance measures correspond to a maximum of link utilizations of the plurality of links.

Assignments (21)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 11, 2023
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC; RIVERBED HOLDINGS, INC.
Reel/Frame 064673/0739 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 18, 2022
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY LLC
Reel/Frame 059232/0551 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Dec 27, 2021
From: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS U.S. COLLATERAL AGENT
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
Reel/Frame 058593/0169 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Dec 27, 2021
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
Reel/Frame 058593/0108 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Dec 27, 2021
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
Reel/Frame 058593/0046 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2021
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY LLC (FORMERLY RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.); ATERNITY LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS U.S. COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 058486/0216 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 27, 2021
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 057943/0386 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT - FIRST LIEN Recorded Oct 14, 2021
From: RIVERBED HOLDINGS, INC.; RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057810/0502 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT - SECOND LIEN Recorded Oct 14, 2021
From: RIVERBED HOLDINGS, INC.; RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 057810/0559 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORED AT REEL 056397, FRAME 0750 Recorded Oct 13, 2021
From: MACQUARIE CAPITAL FUNDING LLC
To: RIVERBED HOLDINGS, INC.; RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
Reel/Frame 057983/0356 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 26, 2021
From: RIVERBED HOLDINGS, INC.; RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ATERNITY LLC
To: MACQUARIE CAPITAL FUNDING LLC
Reel/Frame 056397/0750 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 5, 2021
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 055514/0249 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE CONVEYING PARTY NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 035521 FRAME 0069. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS. Recorded Jun 2, 2015
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 035807/0680 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 1, 2015
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 035561/0363 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Apr 28, 2015
From: BARCLAYS BANK PLC
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 035521/0069 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 27, 2013
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 032421/0162 →
RELEASE OF PATENT SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 26, 2013
From: MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 032113/0425 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 21, 2013
From: OPNET TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.
Reel/Frame 030459/0372 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 14, 2013
From: OPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: OPNET TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 030411/0310 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 20, 2012
From: RIVERBED TECHNOLOGY, INC.; OPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY & CO. LLC
Reel/Frame 029646/0060 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 22, 2008
From: NINAN, BOBBY; BOLT, GORDON M; GOLDSCHMIDT, OLIVIER
To: OPNET TECHNOLOGIES, INC
Reel/Frame 021132/0684 →