IP Library Granted Patent US 8,626,238
Granted Patent B2
US 8,626,238 · App. 12/144,977 · Granted Jan 7, 2014

Method and apparatus for switching in a TDD system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,626,238
App. No.
12/144,977
Granted
Jan 7, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of switching a communication device between an uplink communication path and a downlink communication path is provided. The method measures a power level of signals on at least one radio frequency for one of the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path. The measured power level is compared with a threshold power level. Switching between an uplink circuit and a downlink circuit is based on the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level.

Claims (67)

1. A method of switching a communication device between an uplink communication path and a downlink communication path, the method comprising:

measuring a power level of signals on at least one radio frequency for one of the uplink communication path and downlink communication path;

comparing the measured power level with a threshold power level in order to determine if the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path; and

when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path:

performing a verification process to confirm that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path;

switching between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path if the verification process confirms that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path; and

not switching between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path if the verification process does not confirm that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path if the measured power level is less than or equal to the threshold power level.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein the verification process comprises continuing to compare the measured power level with the threshold power level for a predetermined amount of time, wherein the verification process fails if, during the predetermined amount of time, the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level does not indicate that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path and otherwise the verification process succeeds.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the verification process comprises comparing a time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path with a known possible transmission boundary, wherein the verification process fails if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does not match the known possible transmission boundary and wherein the verification process succeeds if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does match the known possible transmission boundary.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein comparing the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path with the known possible transmission boundary comprises: measuring a length of a subframe; and comparing the measured length to a known possible subframe length.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the verification process comprises performing two verifications process, wherein a first verification process comprises: continuing to compare the measured power level with the threshold power level for a predetermined amount of time, wherein the first verification process fails if, during the predetermined amount of time, the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level does not indicate that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path and otherwise the first verification process succeeds;

wherein a second verification process comprises: comparing a time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path with a known possible transmission boundary, wherein the verification process fails if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does not match the known possible transmission boundary and wherein the verification process succeeds if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does match the known possible transmission boundary,

wherein the first and second verification processes are performed in at least one of in parallel and contiguously; and

wherein the verification process succeeds if either of the first and second verification process succeeds and the verification process fails if neither of the first and second verification process succeeds.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein comparing the measured power level to a threshold power level compares the measure power level to a threshold power level determined by:

measuring an on power level of signals on the at least one radio frequency when transmissions are present on the at least one radio frequency;

measuring an off power level of signals on the at least one radio frequency when transmissions are not present on the at least one radio frequency; and

setting the threshold power level at a point between the on power level and the off power level.

8. An apparatus for switching between uplink and downlink transmission circuits, the apparatus comprising:

a switch having a first port coupled to an uplink circuit, and a second port coupled to a downlink circuit;

a power level detector configured to measure a power level of signals propagating through the switch;

a comparator configured to compare the measured power level to a threshold power level; and

a processing device configured to control the switch based on the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level;

wherein the processing device is further configured to do the following when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the switch should switch between an uplink communication path and a downlink communication path:

perform a verification process to confirm that the switch should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path;

switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path if the verification process confirms that the switch should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path; and

not switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path if the verification process does not confirm that the switch should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path.

9. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the comparator is configured to determine when the measured power level is less than or equal to the threshold power level, wherein the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path if the measured power level is less than or equal to the threshold power level.

10. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the verification process comprises continuing to compare the measured power level with the threshold power level for a predetermined amount of time, wherein the verification process fails if, during the predetermined amount of time, the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level does not indicate that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path and otherwise the verification process succeeds.

11. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the verification process comprises comparing a time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path with a known possible transmission boundary, wherein the verification process fails if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does not match the known possible transmission boundary and wherein the verification process succeeds if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does match the known possible transmission boundary.

12. The apparatus of claim 11 , wherein comparing the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path with the known possible transmission boundary comprises: measuring a length of a subframe; and comparing the measured length to a known possible subframe length.

13. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the verification process comprises performing two verifications process, wherein a first verification process comprises: continuing to compare the measured power level with the threshold power level for a predetermined amount of time, wherein the first verification process fails if, during the predetermined amount of time, the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level does not indicate that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path and otherwise the first verification process succeeds;

wherein a second verification process comprises: comparing a time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path with a known possible transmission boundary, wherein the verification process fails if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does not match the known possible transmission boundary and wherein the verification process succeeds if the time when the comparison between the measured power level and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does match the known possible transmission boundary,

wherein the first and second verification processes are performed in at least one of in parallel and contiguously; and

wherein the verification process succeeds if either of the first and second verification process succeeds and the verification process fails if neither of the first and second verification process succeeds.

14. The apparatus of claim 8 , wherein the power level detector is configured to do at least one of:

measure the power level of signals that are coupled to a common connection of the switch; and

measure the power level of downlink signals before the downlink signals reach the switch.

15. A communication system comprising:

a plurality of remote antenna units communicatively coupled to a plurality of wireless terminals;

at least one hub communicatively coupled to the plurality of remote antenna units, the at least one hub configured to communicatively couple signals between a base station and the plurality of remote antenna units, the at least one hub further comprising:

a switch having a common connection, a first switched connection, and a second switched connection;

an uplink circuit coupled to the first switched connection and configured to receive signals from the plurality of wireless terminals;

a downlink circuit coupled the second switched connection and configured to transmit signals to the plurality of wireless terminals;

a duplexing circuit connected to the common connection and configured to transmit and receive signals from the base station; and

a processing device configured to compare a power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and a threshold power level in order to determine if the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection;

wherein the processing device is further configured to do the following when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection:

if the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection:

perform a verification process to confirm that the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection;

switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection if the verification process confirms that the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection; and

not switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection if the verification process does not confirm that the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection.

16. The system of claim 15 , further comprising:

a power level detector configured to measure a power level of signals in the duplexing circuit;

a comparator configured to compare the measured power level to a threshold power level; and

wherein the processing circuit is configured to control the switch based on the comparison of the measured power level and the threshold power level.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein the comparator is configured to send an interrupt signal to the processing device when the measured power level reaches the threshold power level.

18. The system of claim 17 , wherein the processing device is configured to wait an amount of time after receiving an interrupt and before changing a position of the switch to verify that no more interrupts are received.

19. The system of claim 15 , wherein the processing device is configured to control the switch based on a comparison between the time that the power level of signals on the duplexing circuit reaches a threshold power level and a time period of a transmission structure.

20. The system of claim 15 , wherein the comparison between the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the switch should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection if the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit is less than or equal to the threshold power level.

21. The system of claim 15 , wherein the verification process comprises continuing to compare the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit with the threshold power level for a predetermined amount of time, wherein the verification process fails if, during the predetermined amount of time, the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level does not indicate that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection and otherwise the verification process succeeds.

22. The system of claim 15 , wherein the verification process comprises comparing a time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection with a known possible transmission boundary, wherein the verification process fails if the time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection does not match the known possible transmission boundary and wherein the verification process succeeds if the time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection does match the known possible transmission boundary.

23. The system of claim 22 , wherein comparing the time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection with the known possible transmission boundary comprises: measuring a length of a subframe; and comparing the measured length to a known possible subframe length.

24. The system of claim 15 , wherein the verification process comprises performing two verifications process, wherein a first verification process comprises: continuing to compare the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit with the threshold power level for a predetermined amount of time, wherein the first verification process fails if, during the predetermined amount of time, the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level does not indicate that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path and otherwise the first verification process succeeds;

wherein a second verification process comprises: comparing a time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection with a known possible transmission boundary, wherein the verification process fails if the time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the uplink communication path and the downlink communication path does not match the known possible transmission boundary and wherein the verification process succeeds if the time when the comparison between the power level of signals in the duplexing circuit and the threshold power level indicates that the communication device should switch between the first switched connection and the second switched connection does match the known possible transmission boundary,

wherein the first and second verification processes are performed in at least one of in parallel and contiguously; and

wherein the verification process succeeds if either of the first and second verification process succeeds and the verification process fails if neither of the first and second verification process succeeds.

Assignments (23)
RELEASE (REEL 068770 / FRAME 0460) Recorded Feb 7, 2025
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
Reel/Frame 070149/0432 →
PARTIAL TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 069889/FRAME 0114 Recorded Feb 7, 2025
From: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC
To: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
Reel/Frame 070154/0341 →
PARTIAL TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Feb 7, 2025
From: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
Reel/Frame 070154/0183 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 068770/0632 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
Reel/Frame 069743/0264 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST AT REEL/FRAME 049905/0504 Recorded Dec 19, 2024
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC (F/K/A ARRIS ENTERPRISES, INC.); ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; RUCKUS WIRELESS, LLC (F/K/A RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 071477/0255 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 17, 2024
From: ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE INC., OF NORTH CAROLINA; OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC; RUCKUS IP HOLDINGS LLC
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC
Reel/Frame 069889/0114 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (TERM) Recorded Aug 26, 2024
From: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068770/0632 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (ABL) Recorded Aug 26, 2024
From: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 068770/0460 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 24, 2024
From: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: OUTDOOR WIRELESS NETWORKS LLC
Reel/Frame 068492/0826 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 19, 2021
From: ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST
Reel/Frame 060752/0001 →
ABL SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049892/0396 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 049892/0051 →
TERM LOAN SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 3, 2019
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC; ARRIS ENTERPRISES LLC; ARRIS TECHNOLOGY, INC.; RUCKUS WIRELESS, INC.; ARRIS SOLUTIONS, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
Reel/Frame 049905/0504 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: REDWOOD SYSTEMS, INC.; ALLEN TELECOM LLC; ANDREW LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 049260/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: REDWOOD SYSTEMS, INC.; ALLEN TELECOM LLC; ANDREW LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 048840/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (ABL) Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037514/0196 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT (TERM) Recorded Jan 13, 2016
From: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 037513/0709 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 29, 2015
From: COMMSCOPE EMEA LIMITED
To: COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 037012/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2015
From: TYCO ELECTRONICS SERVICES GMBH
To: COMMSCOPE EMEA LIMITED
Reel/Frame 036956/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 6, 2015
From: ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
To: TYCO ELECTRONICS SERVICES GMBH
Reel/Frame 036060/0174 →
MERGER Recorded Aug 9, 2012
From: LGC WIRELESS, LLC
To: ADC TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 028756/0734 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Aug 9, 2012
From: LGC WIRELESS, INC.
To: LGC WIRELESS, LLC
Reel/Frame 028756/0251 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 24, 2008
From: STRATFORD, SCOTT; SINGH, BALJIT
To: LGC WIRELESS, INC.
Reel/Frame 021143/0053 →