IP Library Granted Patent US 8,224,665
Granted Patent B2
US 8,224,665 · App. 12/146,727 · Granted Jul 17, 2012

Estimating healthcare outcomes for individuals

Assignee: Archimedes, Inc.
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,224,665
App. No.
12/146,727
Granted
Jul 17, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for predicting a health benefit for an individual is provided. Outcomes from a first simulation on a set of simulated individuals reflecting a population are stored and used to determine a first risk function and corresponding cost values. Outcomes from a second simulation on a set of simulated individuals reflecting having a healthcare intervention are stored and used to determine a second risk function reflecting the intervention and corresponding cost values of the intervention. A benefit function is derived from the difference of the first and second risk functions. A cost function that describes the cost of the intervention is derived from the respective cost values. The derived benefit function and cost function are used to predict the corresponding benefit and cost of the healthcare intervention for a given individual. Individuals can be ranked by degree of expected benefit.

Claims (102)

1. A computer-implemented method comprising:

at a computer, receiving input data comprising healthcare costs, processes, and a population;

receiving, using the computer, for a first simulation on a first set of simulated subjects reflecting the population, a first set of outcome data, comprising, in part, for each of the simulated subjects, a plurality of potential healthcare outcomes and associated first risk outcome values representing probabilities that the potential healthcare outcomes will occur;

storing a first set of initial variables and, for each simulated subject, corresponding first outcome data from the first set of outcome data;

receiving, using the computer, for a second simulation reflecting an effect of an additional healthcare intervention on a second set of simulated subjects, a second set of outcome data, comprising, in part, for each of the simulated subjects, a plurality of second potential healthcare outcomes and associated second risk outcome values and representing probabilities that the second potential healthcare outcomes will occur with the intervention;

storing a second set of initial variables and, for each simulated subject, corresponding second outcome data from the second set of outcome data;

determining, using the computer, from the stored first set of initial variables and from the corresponding first outcome data for each simulated subject, a first risk function that describes a first risk under the first set of processes;

determining, using the computer, from the stored second set of initial variables and from the corresponding second outcome data for each simulated subject, a second risk function that describes a second risk under the second set of processes containing data reflecting at least one intervention; and

deriving, using the computer, a benefit function that represents a benefit of the intervention by subtracting the second risk function from the first risk function.

2. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 ,

wherein receiving a first set of outcome data, comprising, in part, first risk outcome values, further comprises receiving a first set of outcome data, comprising, in part, first risk outcome values and first net cost outcomes values;

wherein receiving a second set of outcome data, comprising, in part, second risk outcome values associated with the intervention, further comprises receiving a second set of outcome data, comprising, in part, second risk outcome values and second net cost outcome values associated with the intervention; and

determining, for each subject, a difference value of the corresponding first net cost outcome values and the corresponding second net cost outcome values, and deriving, from the difference value for each subject, a net cost function that describes the net cost of the intervention.

3. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 2 , further comprising:

applying, for an input subject having associated initial values, the benefit function using the associated initial variables and generating a predicted benefit value of the intervention for the input subject;

optionally applying, for the input subject, the net cost function using the associated initial variables and generating a predicted net cost value of the intervention for the input subject; and

storing the predicted benefit value for the intervention and, optionally, the predicted net cost value for the intervention for post-processing.

4. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 2 , wherein determining the first risk function and determining the second risk function or determining the first net cost function and determining the second net cost function comprise applying one or more regression methods selected from: generalized linear and nonlinear regressions, logistic and Poisson regressions, supervised machine learning algorithms, neural networks, support vector machines, response surface modeling, and multivariate adaptive regression splines.

5. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 3 , wherein post-processing comprises determining, based in part on the predicted benefit value whether the input subject receives the intervention.

6. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

applying the benefit function and one or more intervention rules to a plurality of input subjects; and

outputting a list of input subjects from the plurality of input subjects to receive the intervention.

7. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

applying the benefit function and one or more ranking rules to a plurality of input subjects; and

outputting a ranked list of input subjects from the plurality of input subjects to receive the intervention.

8. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 7 , further comprising:

applying the benefit function and the net cost function to a plurality of input subjects selected according to the ranked list;

obtaining, for the plurality of input subjects in the ranked list, a cumulative benefit value and a cumulative net cost value;

displaying, on a graph having one axis represent net cost values and the other axis represent benefit values, the cumulative net cost values and the cumulative benefit values for each of the input subjects; and

using, at a point on the graph, a slope at the point to set a net cost-effectiveness threshold for determining which input subjects receive the intervention.

9. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 , wherein the intervention is configured to represent a combination of two or more different interventions.

10. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 , wherein determining the first and the second risk functions, comprises:

fitting a function to a density of the population over a space of biomarker data to determine a weighted risk function; and

integrating the weighted risk function over a range of unknown variables with a subspace defined by known variables.

11. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 10 , wherein the weighted risk function represents the likelihood of an outcome given specific biomarker data.

12. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 3 , wherein the predicted net cost value is adjusted by a likelihood that the input subject will change behavior towards compliance.

13. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 , further comprising:

creating copies of starting variables for an input subject;

generating random data to represent any missing variables of the starting variables;

applying the benefit function to the starting variables and to any generated random data to compute one or more benefit values;

storing the computed one or more benefit values;

repeating the generating random data step through the storing the computed one or more benefit values step for a predetermined number of times; and

computing an average benefit value using the stored computed one or more benefit values.

14. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 2 , further comprising:

creating copies of starting variables for an input subject;

generating random data to represent any missing variables of the starting variables;

applying the net cost function to the starting variables and to any generated random data to compute one or more net cost values;

storing the computed one or more net cost values;

repeating the generating random data step through the storing the computed one or more net cost values step for a predetermined number of times; and

computing an average net cost value using the stored computed one or more net cost values.

15. A computer-implemented method as recited in claim 1 , wherein results relevant to an individual member are presented directly to that member in tabular or graphical form.

16. A non-transitory computer-readable medium storing one or more sequences of instructions for estimating healthcare costs and benefits for individuals, which instructions, when executed by one or more processors, cause the one or more processors to carry out:

at a computer, receiving input data comprising healthcare costs, processes, and a population;

receiving, using the computer, for a first simulation on a first set of simulated subjects reflecting the population, a first set of outcome data, comprising, in part, for each of the simulated subjects, a plurality of potential healthcare outcomes and associated first risk outcome values representing probabilities that the potential healthcare outcomes will occur;

storing a first set of initial variables and, for each simulated subject, corresponding first outcome data from the first set of outcome data;

receiving, using the computer, for a second simulation reflecting an effect of an additional healthcare intervention on a second set of simulated subjects, a second set of outcome data, comprising, in part, for each of the simulated subjects, a plurality of second potential healthcare outcomes and associated second risk outcome values and representing probabilities that the second potential healthcare outcomes will occur with the intervention;

storing a second set of initial variables and, for each simulated subject, corresponding second outcome data from the second set of outcome data;

determining, using the computer, from the stored first set of initial variables and from the corresponding first outcome data for each simulated subject, a first risk function that describes a first risk under the first set of processes;

determining, using the computer, from the stored second set of initial variables and from the corresponding second outcome data for each simulated subject, a second risk function that describes a second risk under the second set of processes containing data reflecting at least one intervention; and

deriving, using the computer, a benefit function that represents a benefit of the intervention by subtracting the second risk function from the first risk function.

17. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 16 , further causing the one or more processors to carry out:

wherein receiving a first set of outcome data, comprising, in part, first risk outcome values, further comprises receiving a first set of outcome data, comprising, in part, first risk outcome values and first net cost outcomes values;

wherein receiving a second set of outcome data, comprising, in part, second risk outcome values associated with the intervention, further comprises receiving a second set of outcome data, comprising, in part, second risk outcome values and second net cost outcome values associated with the intervention; and

determining, for each subject, a difference value of the corresponding first net cost outcome values and the corresponding second net cost outcome values, and deriving, from the difference value for each subject, a net cost function that describes the net cost of the intervention.

18. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17 , further comprising:

applying, for an input subject having associated initial values, the benefit function using the associated initial variables and generating a predicted benefit value of the intervention for the input subject;

applying, for the input subject, the net cost function using the associated initial variables and generating a predicted net cost value of the intervention for the input subject; and

storing the predicted benefit value for the intervention and the predicted net cost value for the intervention for post-processing.

19. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17 , wherein determining the first risk function and determining the second risk function or determining the first net cost function and determining the second net cost function comprise applying one or more regression methods selected from: generalized linear and nonlinear regressions, logistic and Poisson regressions, supervised machine learning algorithms, neural networks, support vector machines, response surface modeling, and multivariate adaptive regression splines.

20. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 18 , wherein post-processing comprises determining, based in part on the predicted benefit value whether the input subject receives the intervention.

21. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17 , further causing the one or more processors to carry out:

applying the benefit function and one or more intervention rules to a plurality of input subjects; and

outputting a list of input subjects from the plurality of input subjects to receive the intervention.

22. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 16 , further causing the one or more processors to carry out:

applying the benefit function and one or more ranking rules to a plurality of input subjects; and

outputting a ranked list of input subjects from the plurality of input subjects to receive the intervention.

23. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 22 , further causing the one or more processors to carry out:

applying the benefit function and the net cost function to a plurality of input subjects selected according to the ranked list;

obtaining, for each of the plurality of input subjects, a benefit value and a net cost value;

displaying, on a graph having one axis represent net cost values and the other axis represent benefit values, the cumulative net cost values and the cumulative benefit values for each of the input subjects; and

using, at a point on the graph, a slope at the point to set a net cost-effectiveness threshold for determining which input subjects receive the intervention.

24. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 16 , wherein the intervention is configured to represent a combination of two or more different interventions.

25. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 16 , wherein determining the first and the second risk functions, comprises:

fitting a function to a density of the population over a space of biomarker data to determine a weighted risk function; and

integrating the weighted risk function over a range of unknown variables with a subspace defined by known variables.

26. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 25 , wherein the weighted risk function represents the likelihood of an outcome given specific biomarker data.

27. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 18 , wherein the predicted net cost value is adjusted by a likelihood that the input subject will change behavior towards compliance.

28. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 16 , further causing the one or more processors to carry out:

creating copies of starting variables for an input subject;

generating random data to represent any missing variables of the starting variables;

applying the benefit function to the starting variables and to any generated random data to compute one or more benefit values;

storing the computed one or more benefit values;

repeating the generating random data step through the storing the computed one or more benefit values step for a predetermined number of times; and

computing an average benefit value using the stored computed one or more benefit values.

29. A non-transitory computer-readable medium as recited in claim 17 , further causing the one or more processors to carry out:

creating copies of starting variables for an input subject;

generating random data to represent any missing variables of the starting variables;

applying the net cost function to the starting variables and to any generated random data to compute one or more net cost values;

storing the computed one or more net cost values;

repeating the generating random data step through the storing the computed one or more net cost values step for a predetermined number of times; and

computing an average net cost value using the stored computed one or more net cost values.

30. A non-transitory computer-implemented method as recited in claim 16 , wherein results relevant to an individual member are presented directly to that member in tabular or graphical form.

Assignments (20)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2024
From: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
To: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC.
Reel/Frame 069507/0958 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2024
From: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
Reel/Frame 069508/0182 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 6, 2024
From: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC.
Reel/Frame 069508/0128 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 9, 2023
From: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC
To: WESTERN ALLIANCE BANK
Reel/Frame 063580/0902 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2023
From: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
To: MDDATACOR, LLC
Reel/Frame 062705/0231 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Feb 15, 2023
From: MDDATACOR, LLC
To: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC
Reel/Frame 062705/0037 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 9, 2022
From: AZARA INTERMEDIATE LLC
To: WEBSTER BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 060328/0412 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 25, 2021
From: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
To: STERLING NATIONAL BANK
Reel/Frame 055023/0270 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 23, 2020
From: SILICON VALLEY BANK
To: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.; STG M&M PARENT INC.; MDDATACOR, LLC; MERRIMAN PARENT, INC.; MERRIMAN, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; PATIENT SATISFACTION PLUS, LLC
Reel/Frame 054449/0747 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 26, 2019
From: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING VII, INC.
To: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
Reel/Frame 049594/0747 →
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 6, 2019
From: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.; STG M&M PARENT INC.; MDDATACOR, LLC; MERRIMAN PARENT, INC.; MERRIMAN, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; PATIENT SATISFACTION PLUS, LLC
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK
Reel/Frame 049406/0142 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL (RELEASES RF 03214/0260) Recorded Sep 2, 2016
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: ARCHIMEDES, INC.; EVIDERA HOLDINGS, INC.; EVIDERA, INC.; EVIDERA LLC
Reel/Frame 039905/0004 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 8, 2015
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
To: EVIDERA HOLDINGS, INC.; EVIDERA, INC.; EVIDERA LLC; ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 036511/0774 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded May 15, 2015
From: SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH HOLDINGS, INC.; SYMPHONY PERFORMANCE HEALTH, INC.; VOYANCE, LLC; CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
To: VENTURE LENDING & LEASING VII, INC.
Reel/Frame 035652/0320 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 29, 2014
From: EVIDERA ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: CLINICAL ANALYTICS CORP.
Reel/Frame 033414/0751 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 27, 2014
From: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
To: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033248/0057 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 20, 2014
From: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: EVIDERA ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033205/0859 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 5, 2014
From: EVIDERA HOLDINGS, INC.; EVIDERA, INC.; EVIDERA LLC; ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
Reel/Frame 032164/0260 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 16, 2013
From: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
To: KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS
Reel/Frame 031421/0398 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 2, 2008
From: MORRIS, MACDONALD
To: ARCHIMEDES, INC.
Reel/Frame 021189/0691 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20090326976A1 · Dec 31, 2009