IP Library Granted Patent US 8,224,755
Granted Patent B2
US 8,224,755 · App. 12/168,487 · Granted Jul 17, 2012

Socially derived, graduated access control in collaboration environments

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,224,755
App. No.
12/168,487
Granted
Jul 17, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for socially derived, graduated access control to a collaboration environment includes calculating a variable reputation score for a user based on a user's actions within a collaboration environment; and dynamically enabling graduated access control to the collaboration environment based on the reputation score.

Claims (37)

1. A method for socially derived, graduated access control to a collaboration environment, comprising:

calculating a variable reputation score for at least one user by a processor, said reputation score based on attendance in-person at a meeting or event, a valid e-mail address, verification of user-provided data, user participation in the collaboration environment, endorsement of a user by other users, and length of user affiliation or tenure with the collaboration environment; and

dynamically enabling graduated access control to the collaboration environment based on the reputation score.

2. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the collaboration environment comprises at least one of the following: shared web applications, shared web experiences; shared web browsing, shopping sites, banking sites; instant messaging, text messaging, online bulletin boards, shared whiteboards, shared document production, discussion forums, discussion threads, or voice over IP.

3. A method according to claim 1 , wherein user-provided data comprises at least one of the following: telephone number, social security number, birthday, current address, past address, shipping address, the name of the street the user grew up on, names of siblings, parents or other relatives; employment information; or financial information.

4. A method according to claim 1 , wherein upon verification of user-provided data, the at least one user is allowed access to participate with other users in the collaboration environment.

5. A method according to claim 1 , wherein user participation in the collaboration environment comprises at least one of the following: frequency of posting, revising, commenting on, or contributing articles, comments, ratings, articles, blogs, or reviews; attendance at online meeting or events; the frequency of which the at least one user interacts with other users; or how often do other users or members interact with the at least one user.

6. A method according to claim 5 , further comprising evaluating the at least one user's contributions to the collaboration environment via a textual analysis of the user's contribution with other contributions to the collaboration environment.

7. A method according to claim 1 , wherein calculating the reputation score further comprises a measurement of a number of endorsements of the at least one user by other users in the collaboration environment and of reputation scores of the other users.

8. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising creating a digital fingerprint for at least one user.

9. A method according to claim 1 , wherein different elements of the reputation score are weighted differently.

10. A method according to claim 1 , wherein at least one threshold for the reputation score is implemented before allowing additional access control.

11. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the reputation score comprises a decay element which automatically adjusts the reputation score based on the at least one user's involvement over time.

12. A method according to claim 1 , wherein the reputation score is calculated in real-time.

13. A method according to claim 1 , comprising automatically enabling graduated access control to the collaboration environment based on the reputation score.

14. A method for socially derived, graduated access control to a collaboration environment, comprising:

calculating a variable reputation score for a user by a processor; and

dynamically and automatically enabling graduated access control to the collaboration environment based on the reputation score,

wherein the variable reputation score is calculated based on:

verification of a valid e-mail address,

verification of user-provided data,

evaluation of the user's contributions to the collaboration environment via a textual analysis of the user's contribution with other contributions to the collaboration environment or to external texts written by the user,

attendance in-person at a meeting or event,

endorsement of the user by other users, and

length of user affiliation or tenure with the collaboration environment.

15. A computer program product, comprising:

a computer useable non-transitory storage medium having a computer readable program, wherein the computer readable program when executed on a computer causes the computer to:

calculate a variable reputation score for at least one user based on attendance in-person at a meeting or event, a valid e-mail address, verification of user-provided data, user participation in the collaboration environment, endorsement of a user by other users, and length of user affiliation or tenure with the collaboration environment; and

enable graduated access control to the collaboration environment dynamically based on the reputation score.

16. A method according to claim 5 , comprising evaluating the at least one user's contributions to the collaboration environment via a textual analysis of the user's contribution to external texts written by the user.

17. A method according to claim 16 , wherein the external texts written by the user comprise published papers.

18. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising ranking all users of the collaboration environment by reputation score.

19. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising verifying user-provided data by analysis of information located on a social networking website.

20. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising verifying user-provided data by analysis of information from professional organizations, business directories, real estate records, or criminal records.

21. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising verifying user-provided data by analysis of information that is publicly available using a web search.

22. A method according to claim 1 , wherein attendance at an in-person meeting or event is weighted more than user participation in the collaboration environment in calculating the at least one user's reputation score.

23. A method according to claim 1 , further comprising: taking attendance at the in-person meeting or event; and validating the at least one user's identification.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 15, 2021
From: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
To: AIRBNB, INC.
Reel/Frame 056427/0193 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 7, 2008
From: GOODMAN, BRIAN D; MIHAESCU, MIRCEA
To: INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 021200/0236 →