IP Library Granted Patent US 8,112,304
Granted Patent B2
US 8,112,304 · App. 12/192,305 · Granted Feb 7, 2012

Method of risk management across a mission support network

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,112,304
App. No.
12/192,305
Granted
Feb 7, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method of risk management across a mission support network is provided, including identifying a mission of the mission support network, and identifying, by a computer processor, assets of the mission support network. The assets include a mission asset to support the mission and a support asset to provide support to the mission asset. Each of the assets is characterized by a criticality index value to measure how important the asset is to a performance of the mission, and a vulnerability index value to measure a vulnerability of the asset to a threat.

Claims (61)

1. A method of risk management across a mission support network, comprising:

identifying a mission of the mission support network; and

identifying, by a computer processor, assets of the mission support network, the assets comprising:

a mission asset to support the mission; and

a support asset to provide support to the mission asset; and

defining a link between the mission asset and the support asset, the link indicative of support provided by the support asset,

wherein each of the assets is characterized by a criticality index value to measure how important the asset is to a performance of the mission, and a vulnerability index value to measure a vulnerability of the asset to a threat.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

identifying an impact of a threat placed on the mission support network.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising:

managing a risk to the mission support network based on the impact of the threat.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein managing the risk comprises:

reducing the vulnerabilities of at least one of the assets.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein reducing the vulnerabilities comprises:

reducing the vulnerability index value of at least one of the assets before an occurrence of the threat.

6. The method of claim 3 , wherein managing the risk comprises:

identifying a mitigation action to mitigate the impact of the threat.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein the mitigation action comprises:

identifying a backup asset to replace at least one of the assets during an occurrence of the threat.

8. The method of claim 3 , wherein managing the risk comprises:

defining countermeasures to mitigate the risk.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein the support asset further comprises:

a threatened asset upon which an impact of a threat is applied; and

identifying the impact of the threat on the mission asset based on the support provided by the threatened asset.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the mission support network comprises a first mission support network and a second mission support network coupled to the first mission support network.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein at least one first infrastructure asset represents a first sector and at least one second infrastructure asset represents a second sector.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

outputting the mission support network to enable display to a user.

13. The method of claim 12 , outputting further comprises:

applying a filter to the mission support network based on a role of the user.

14. An article comprising:

a machine-readable medium that stores executable instructions to provide risk management across a mission support network, the executable instructions causing a machine to:

identify a mission of the mission support network;

identify assets of the mission support network, the assets comprising:

a mission asset to support the mission; and

a support asset to provide support to the mission asset; and

define a link between the mission asset and the support asset, the link indicative of support provided by the support asset,

wherein each of the assets is characterized by a criticality index value to measure how important the asset is to a performance of the mission, and a vulnerability index value to measure a vulnerability of the asset to a threat.

15. The article according to claim 14 , wherein the executable instructions further cause a machine to:

identify an impact of a threat placed on the mission support network.

16. The article according to claim 15 , wherein the executable instructions further cause a machine to:

manage a risk to the mission support network based on the impact of the threat.

17. The article according to claim 16 , wherein managing the risk comprises:

reducing the vulnerabilities of at least one of the assets.

18. The article according to claim 17 , wherein reducing the vulnerabilities comprises:

reducing the vulnerability index value of at least one of the assets before an occurrence of the threat.

19. The article according to claim 16 , wherein managing the risk comprises:

identifying a mitigation action to mitigate the impact of the threat.

20. The article according to claim 19 , wherein identifying the mitigation action comprises:

identifying a backup asset to replace at least one of the assets during an occurrence of the threat.

21. The article according to claim 16 , wherein managing the risk comprises:

defining countermeasures to mitigate the risk.

22. The article according to claim 14 , wherein the support asset further comprises:

a threatened asset upon which an impact of a threat is applied; and the executable instructions further cause a machine to:

identify the impact of the threat on the mission asset based on the support provided by the threatened asset.

23. The article according to claim 14 , wherein the mission support network comprises a first mission support network and a second mission support network coupled to the first mission support network.

24. The article according to claim 23 , wherein at least one first infrastructure asset represents a first sector and at least one second infrastructure asset represents a second sector.

25. The article according to claim 14 , wherein the executable instructions further cause a machine to:

output the mission support network to enable display to a user.

26. The article according to claim 25 , wherein outputting further comprises:

applying a filter to the mission support network based on a role of the user.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2025
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
To: FORCEPOINT, LLC; BITGLASS, LLC
Reel/Frame 070706/0263 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 21, 2025
From: FORCEPOINT FEDERAL HOLDINGS LLC
To: EVERFOX HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 070585/0625 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 29, 2023
From: FORCEPOINT FEDERAL HOLDINGS LLC
To: APOLLO ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 065086/0822 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded May 12, 2021
From: FORCEPOINT LLC
To: FORCEPOINT FEDERAL HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 056216/0309 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 20, 2021
From: REDOWL ANALYTICS, INC.; FORCEPOINT LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 055052/0302 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Jan 8, 2021
From: RAYTHEON COMPANY
To: WEBSENSE, INC.; PORTAUTHORITY TECHNOLOGIES, LLC (FKA PORTAUTHORITY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.); RAYTHEON OAKLEY SYSTEMS, LLC; FORCEPOINT FEDERAL LLC (FKA RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, LLC, FKA RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, INC.)
Reel/Frame 055492/0146 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 1, 2017
From: FORCEPOINT FEDERAL LLC
To: FORCEPOINT LLC
Reel/Frame 043397/0460 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 16, 2016
From: RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, LLC
To: FORCEPOINT FEDERAL LLC
Reel/Frame 037821/0818 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 9, 2015
From: WEBSENSE, INC.; RAYTHEON OAKLEY SYSTEMS, LLC; RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, INC.); PORT AUTHORITY TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
To: RAYTHEON COMPANY
Reel/Frame 035859/0282 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Jun 2, 2015
From: RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, INC.
To: RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, LLC
Reel/Frame 035806/0367 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2015
From: RAYTHEON COMPANY
To: RAYTHEON CYBER PRODUCTS, INC.
Reel/Frame 035774/0322 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 26, 2008
From: SCATES, JOSEPH F.
To: RAYTHEON COMPANY
Reel/Frame 021442/0815 →