IP Library Patent Application 12249304
Patent Application
App. No. 12/249,304

CLOSED LOOP SELF CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE WITHIN A DOCUMENT PROCESSING ENVIRONMENT

Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US None
App. No.
12/249,304
Abstract

The present application relates to techniques for closed loop monitoring and performance control of document processing equipment within a document processing facility. In particular, a maintenance feedback system and related methods for coordinating service actions for document processing equipment are disclosed, for determining the impact that an identified fault correction or performance service has on the actual operational performance of the document processing equipment.

Claims (47)

1 . A method for closed loop monitoring and control of performance of document processing equipment within a document processing facility, the method comprising steps of:

gathering a plurality of performance metrics that characterize the operational performance of document processing equipment within the document processing facility;

detecting a performance degradation of the document processing equipment based on the generated performance metrics;

upon detection of the performance degradation, triggering a corrective response action comprising steps of:

identifying event data for isolating one or more specific functional or physical causes of the degradation associated with the document processing equipment;

coordinating resources necessary for executing identified best practice service instructions; and

upon execution of the best practice service instructions, validating that operational performance of the document processing equipment is corrected.

2 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the gathering step occurs during operating time of the document processing equipment.

3 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the identifying step includes:

identifying the event data of the document processing equipment that led to the type of performance degradation detected.

4 . The method of claim 3 , wherein the event data is an aggregate of raw data gathered during run time or fault time of the document processing equipment.

5 . The method of claim 1 , further comprising a step of:

identifying best practice service instructions to be performed for addressing the functional or physical causes of the degradation associated with the document processing equipment.

6 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the validating step includes:

comparing performance metrics as determined before execution of the best practice service instructions with performance metrics determined upon execution of the best practice service instructions.

7 . The method of claim 1 , wherein the document processing equipment is selected from sorters, inserters, cutters, printers, folders or mail bins.

8 . A computer programmed to implement the steps of the method of claim 1 .

9 . An article of manufacture, comprising:

a machine readable storage medium; and

an executable program embodied in the storage medium for causing a computer to implement the steps of the method of claim 1 .

10 . A method for coordinating resources in response to performance degradation of document processing equipment within a document processing facility, the method comprising steps of:

identifying one or more best practice service instructions from a set to be performed to address the performance degradation, the performance degradation including one or more specific functional or physical causes of the degradation associated with the document processing equipment;

coordinating resources for executing the one or more best practice service instructions, the resources selected from one or more of the following: a part, production scheduling, skill set, personnel or equipment;

validating that operational performance of the document processing equipment is corrected following execution of the one or more best practice service instructions; and

upon validation, updating the set of best practice service instructions.

11 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the validating step includes:

comparing performance metrics as determined before execution of the best practice service instructions with performance metrics determined upon execution of the best practice service instructions.

12 . The method of claim 10 , wherein the document processing equipment is selected from sorters, inserters, cutters, printers, folders or mail bins.

13 . A computer programmed to implement the steps of the method of claim 10 .

14 . An article of manufacture, comprising:

a machine readable storage medium; and

an executable program embodied in the storage medium for causing a computer to implement the steps of the method of claim 10 .

15 . A method for arranging a service request in response to performance degradation of document processing equipment within a document processing facility, the method comprising steps of:

receiving notification of implementation of one or more best practice service instructions on the document processing equipment, the best practice instructions implemented in response to detected degradation in the document processing equipment;

activating the document processing equipment subsequent to the implementation of the one or more best practice service instructions;

requesting a service request to standby pending a determination of operational performance of the document processing equipment subsequent to the implementation of the one or more best practice service instructions;

evaluating the operational performance of the document processing equipment subsequent to the activation of the document processing equipment; and

alerting the service technician to implement an additional best practice service instructions when the degradation still persists based upon results of the evaluation.

16 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the document processing equipment is selected from sorters, inserters, cutters, printers, folders or mail bins.

17 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the alerting step includes:

sending the service technician instructions to a portable network communication device.

18 . The method of claim 15 , wherein the evaluating step includes:

comparing performance metrics as determined before the best practice service instructions are implemented with performance metrics as determined after implementation of the best practice service instructions.

19 . A computer programmed to implement the steps of the method of claim 15 .

20 . An article of manufacture, comprising:

a machine readable storage medium; and

an executable program embodied in the storage medium for causing a computer to implement the steps of the method of claim 15 .

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY INTERESTS RECORDED AT R/F 26722/0845 Recorded Dec 13, 2018
From: CONTRADO BBH FUNDING 2, LLC, AS SECURED PARTY
To: BELL AND HOWELL, LLC
Reel/Frame 048961/0714 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2015
From: BELL AND HOWELL, LLC; BELL AND HOWELL BCC, LLC
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 036552/0376 →
BANKRUPTCY COURT ORDER RELEASING ALL LIENS Recorded Oct 28, 2011
From: HARRIS N.A. FOR ITSELF AND AS SUCCESSOR BY MERGER TO HARRIS TRUST AND SAVINGS BANK
To: BELL AND HOWELL, LLC
Reel/Frame 027139/0160 →
SECURITY INTEREST (SUBORDINATED LOAN) Recorded Aug 9, 2011
From: BELL AND HOWELL, LLC
To: CONTRADO BBH FUNDING 2, LLC
Reel/Frame 026722/0845 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 15, 2011
From: BELL AND HOWELL, LLC; BELL AND HOWELL BCC, LLC
To: PNC BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 026598/0456 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 30, 2011
From: BOWE BELL + HOWELL COMPANY
To: BELL AND HOWELL, LLC
Reel/Frame 026533/0413 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 19, 2009
From: BOWE BELL + HOWELL COMPANY
To: HARRIS N.A., AS SECURED PARTY
Reel/Frame 022694/0606 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 10, 2008
From: PERRA, ROBERT R.; GUBERSKI, JAMES M.; BULLOCK, DONALD F.
To: BOWE BELL + HOWELL COMPANY
Reel/Frame 021667/0479 →