System and method for regulating bandwidth in a multicast video transmission system
View Patent ↗A video transmitter can adaptively alter its transmission rate to plural receivers which receive video via multicast transmission. While the transmitter is initially in the “no tuning state”, the need for a video tune-up state change can be determined. If so, then the state can be set to “tuning up” and the retransmission rate can be increased. However, if “tuning-up” is no longer required, the state returns to the “no tuning” state” Likewise, the need for a video tune down slate change can be determined and the retransmission rate can be decreased. However, if the state is set to “tuning down” and “tuning down” is no longer required, the state is set such that “tuning down” is no longer true and the state returns to the “no tuning” state.
1. A video transmitter for communicating with plural video receivers for connecting to corresponding video display devices, the transmitter comprising:
rate meter for monitoring a current transmission bitrate and a current maximum retransmission bitrate; and
determining means for determining if state changes are needed to alter the current maximum retransmission bitrate of the transmitter, wherein the determining means performs the steps of:
determining if (a) a state of the transmitter is “no tuning” and (b) the current maximum retransmission bitrate has been greater than a video tune-up start threshold for at least a video tune-up interval;
setting the state of the transmitter to “tuning up” if conditions (a) and (b) are true;
determining if (c) the state of the transmitter is “tuning up” and (d) the current maximum retransmission bitrate is greater than a video tune-up stop threshold;
setting the state of the transmitter to “no tuning” if conditions (c) and (d) are true;
determining if (e) the state of the transmitter is “no tuning” and (f) the current maximum retransmission bitrate has been greater than a video tune-down start threshold for at least a video tune-down interval;
setting the state of the transmitter to “tuning down” if conditions (e) and (f) are true;
determining if (g) the state of the transmitter is “tuning down” and (h) the current maximum retransmission bitrate is less than a video tune-down stop threshold;
setting the state of the transmitter to “no tuning” if conditions (g) and (h) are true;
increasing the current maximum retransmission bitrate by a video tune-up step when the state of the transmitter is “tuning up” without changing the current transmission bitrate; and
decreasing the current maximum retransmission bitrate by a video tune-down step when the state of the transmitter is “tuning down” without changing the current transmission bitrate,
wherein the rate meter prevents retransmission of retransmission data from the video transmitter to the plural video receivers from exceeding the current maximum retransmission rate.
2. The video transmitter as claimed in claim 1 , wherein the video transmitter communicates with the plural video receivers using a wireless communications interface.
3. The video transmitter as claimed in claim 2 , wherein the wireless communications interface comprises a communications interface complying with an 802.11 family of wireless protocols.
4. A video system comprising:
plural video receivers for connecting to corresponding video display devices; and a transmitter for communicating with the plural video receivers, the transmitter comprising:
a communications interface for communicating with the plural video receivers;
a rate meter for monitoring a current transmission bitrate and a current maximum retransmission bitrate;
determining means for determining if state changes are needed to alter a retransmission bitrate of the transmitter, wherein the determining means performs the steps of:
determining if (a) a state of the transmitter is “no tuning” and (b) the current maximum retransmission bitrate has been greater than a video tune-up start threshold for at least a video tune-up interval;
setting the state of the transmitter to “tuning up” if conditions (a) and (b) are true;
determining if (c) the state of the transmitter is “turning up” and (d) the current maximum retransmission bitrate is greater than a video tune-up stop threshold;
setting the state of the transmitter to “no tuning” if conditions (c) and (d) are true;
determining if (e) the state of the transmitter is “no tuning” and (f) the current maximum retransmission bitrate has been greater than a video tune-down start threshold for at least a video tune-down interval;
setting the state of the transmitter to “tuning down” if conditions (e) and (f) are true;
determining if (g) the state of the transmitter is “tuning down” and (h) the current maximum retransmission bitrate is less than a video tune-down stop threshold;
setting the state of the transmitter to “no tuning” if conditions (g) and (h) are true;
increasing the current maximum retransmission bitrate by a video tune-up step when the state of the transmitter is “tuning up” without changing the current transmission bitrate; and
decreasing the current maximum retransmission bitrate by a video tune-down step when the state of the transmitter is “tuning down” without changing the current transmission bitrate,
wherein the rate meter prevents retransmission of retransmission data from the video transmitter to the plural video receivers from exceeding the current maximum retransmission rate.
5. The video system as claimed in claim 4 , wherein communications interface comprises a wireless communications interface.
6. The video system as claimed in claim 5 , wherein the wireless communications interface comprises a communications interface complying with an 802.11 family of wireless protocols.