IP Library Granted Patent US 8,431,374
Granted Patent B2
US 8,431,374 · App. 12/263,436 · Granted Apr 30, 2013

Methods for the economical production of biofuel from biomass

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,431,374
App. No.
12/263,436
Granted
Apr 30, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

Methods for producing a biofuel are provided. Also provided are biocatalysts that convert a feedstock to a biofuel.

Claims (58)

1. A method of making isobutanol, the method comprising:

a) providing a feedstock comprising a sugar selected from the group consisting of:

i) a six-carbon sugar;

ii) a six-carbon sugar oligomer;

iii) a five-carbon sugar; and

iv) any combination of i) through iii);

b) contacting the feedstock of a) with an engineered microorganism under suitable fermentation conditions such that said engineered microorganism converts the feedstock into isobutanol at:

i) a yield of at least 68 percent theoretical yield;

ii) a productivity of at least 0.75 grams isobutanol per liter per hour; and

iii) a total titer of at least 1.6% (w/v) of isobutanol in water, wherein said engineered microorganism expresses exogenous genes encoding an acetolactate synthase that catalyzes the conversion of pyruvate to acetolactate, a ketol-acid reductoisomerase that catalyzes the conversion of acetolactate to 2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate, a dihydroxy acid dehydratase that catalyzes the conversion of 2,3-dihydroxyisovalerate to α-ketoisovalerate, a ketoisovalerate decarboxylase that catalyzes the conversion of α-ketoisovalerate to isobutyraldehyde, and an isobutyraldehyde dehydrogenase that catalyzes the conversion of isobutyraldehyde to isobutanol; and

c) recovering the isobutanol.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the six-carbon sugar is glucose, galactose, or mannose.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein the sugar is glucose.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the five-carbon sugar is arabinose or xylose.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein the six-carbon sugar oligomer is sucrose or lactose.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is converted to a co-product and wherein the co-product is feed grade.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable to produce the isobutanol free of byproducts that would require additional processing steps for removal from the isobutanol.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein byproducts account for less than or about 5% of the total product.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the byproducts are selected from the group consisting of acetate, lactate, butyrate, isobutyrate, acetolactate, acetoin, ethanol, isopentanol, and isobutyraldehyde.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism contains no DNA markers.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism provided includes DNA consisting of natural DNA.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable at dissolved oxygen concentrations from about 0% to about 0.01% air saturation.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism converts a feedstock into the isobutanol under dissolved oxygen concentrations from about 0% to about 0.01% air saturation at essentially the same yield, productivity, and titer as under dissolved-oxygen concentrations greater than 0.01%.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to convert the feedstock into the isobutanol at a yield of at least 85 percent theoretical yield.

15. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to convert the feedstock into the isobutanol at a yield of at least 90 percent theoretical yield.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to convert the feedstock into the isobutanol at a yield of at least 95 percent theoretical yield.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to convert the feedstock into the isobutanol at a yield of at least 99 percent theoretical yield.

18. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to have the productivity of at least 1.5 grams isobutanol per gram cell dry weight per hour.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to have the productivity of at least 2 grams isobutanol per gram cell dry weight per hour.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to have the productivity of at least 2.5 grams isobutanol per liter per hour.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to have the productivity of at least 3 grams isobutanol per liter per hour.

22. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is selected to have the productivity of at least 3.5 grams isobutanol per liter per hour.

23. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable at a pH value between about 2 and 10 to produce the isobutanol.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein the microorganism is operable at a pH value between about 6 and 8 to produce the isobutanol.

25. The method of claim 24 , wherein the microorganism is operable at a pH value of about 6.5.

26. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism retains 85% productivity in the presence of a second pH value, wherein the second pH value represents an increase or decrease of about 1 pH unit from a first pH value.

27. The method of claim 26 , wherein the microorganism retains 95% productivity in the presence of a second pH value, wherein the second pH value represents an increase or decrease of about 1 pH unit from a first pH value.

28. The method of claim 27 , wherein the microorganism retains 99% productivity in the presence of a second pH value, wherein the second pH value represents an increase or decrease of about 1 pH unit from a first pH value.

29. The method of claim 26 , wherein the change in pH is a sudden change.

30. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable within a temperature range of about 20° C. to 80° C.

31. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable within a temperature range of about 25° C. to 60° C.

32. The method of claim 31 , wherein the microorganism is operable within a temperature range of about 30° C. to 40° C.

33. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism retains 85% productivity in the presence of a second temperature value, wherein the second temperature value represents an increase or decrease of about 5° C. from a first temperature value.

34. The method of claim 33 , wherein the microorganism retains 95% productivity in the presence of a second temperature value, wherein the second temperature value represents an increase or decrease of about 5° C. from a first temperature value.

35. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism retains 85% productivity in the presence of a second temperature value, wherein the second temperature value represents an increase or decrease of about 10° C. from a first temperature value.

36. The method of claim 35 , wherein the microorganism retains 95% productivity in the presence of a second temperature value, wherein the second temperature value represents an increase or decrease of about 10° C. from a first temperature value.

37. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable in a medium consisting of:

a) mineral salts comprised of major and minor bioelements;

b) vitamins; and

c) feedstock.

38. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable in a medium consisting of:

a) mineral salts comprised of major and minor bioelements; and

b) feedstock.

39. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is operable in a medium consisting of feedstock.

40. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism comprises a growth rate of at least 0.2 generations per hour.

41. The method of claim 1 , wherein the microorganism is a facultative anaerobic microorganism operable at dissolved oxygen concentrations from about 0% to 0.01% air saturation.

42. The method of claim 41 , wherein the facultative anaerobic microorganism retains 85% productivity in the presence of dissolved oxygen concentrations of more than 1% air saturation.

43. The method of claim 42 , wherein the facultative anaerobic biocatalyst microorganism retains 95% productivity in the presence of dissolved oxygen concentrations of more than 1% air saturation.

Assignments (13)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 6, 2021
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB
To: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 054912/0709 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 14, 2020
From: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 051591/0697 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 13, 2020
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
To: GEVO, INC.; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC
Reel/Frame 051497/0560 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 21, 2017
From: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
To: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 042940/0081 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 21, 2017
From: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 042940/0103 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 4, 2016
From: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC
To: GEVO, INC.
Reel/Frame 040219/0177 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 23, 2015
From: WB GEVO, LTD., AS SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO WHITEBOX ADVISORS LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
Reel/Frame 034806/0926 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 10, 2014
From: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
To: WILMINGTON SAVINGS FUND SOCIETY, FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 033120/0453 →
AMENDED AND RESTATED PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 6, 2014
From: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
To: WB GEVO, LTD., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 033101/0302 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 13, 2014
From: GEVO, INC.; GEVO DEVELOPMENT, LLC; AGRI-ENERGY, LLC
To: WHITEBOX ADVISORS LLC, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 032891/0881 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 18, 2013
From: GEVO, INC. (AS GRANTOR)
To: TRIPLEPOINT CAPITAL LLC (AS GRANTEE)
Reel/Frame 031847/0342 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 11, 2010
From: LANDWEHR, MARCO
To: GEVO, INC.
Reel/Frame 024525/0336 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 4, 2009
From: HAWKINS, ANDREW C.; GLASSNER, DAVID A.; BUELTER, THOMAS; WADE, JAMES L.; MEINHOLD, PETER; PETERS, MATTHEW W.; GRUBER, PATRICK R.; EVANKO, WILLIAM A.; ARISTIDOU, ARISTOS A.
To: GEVO, INC.
Reel/Frame 023193/0375 →