IP Library Granted Patent US 8,396,162
Granted Patent B2
US 8,396,162 · App. 12/263,590 · Granted Mar 12, 2013

Method and apparatus for choosing a modulation and coding rate in a multi-user, MIMO communication system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,396,162
App. No.
12/263,590
Granted
Mar 12, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and apparatus for choosing a modulation and coding rate in a MU-MIMO communication system is provided herein. During operation, a node will determine the MCR to feed back to the base even though the mobile does not know which of the possible interferers (if any) will be using the same time/frequency resources as the mobile. This takes place via the mobile node calculating best antenna weights (codebook choice) for each group of subcarriers that can be potentially used by the mobile. Transmit weights v for each interferer are then determined and the weights are utilized to determine a best modulation and coding rate for the mobile.

Claims (50)

1. A method for a mobile to determine a best modulation and coding rate for a resource within a communication system employing adaptive modulation and coding and transmit spatial division multiple access, the method comprising the steps of:

determining, by the mobile, a codebook choice for the resource;

determining, by the mobile, one or more possible interferers;

determining, by the mobile, antenna weights for the mobile;

determining, by the mobile, antenna weights for the possible interferers based on the codebook choice; and

using, by the mobile, the antenna weights for one or more possible interferers and the antenna weights for the mobile to determine a modulation and coding rate for the mobile.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the antenna weights for the mobile maximizes transmit energy in the direction of the mobile while steering a null in the direction of one or more interferers.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the antenna weights for the possible interferers maximizes transmit energy in the direction of an interferer while steering a null in the direction of the mobile.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the one or more possible interferers are determined based on the codebook choice.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the antenna weights for the mobile and the antenna weights for one or more possible interferers comprise base station transmit antenna weights used by the base station when transmitting information to the mobile and the one or more interferers.

6. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of determining antenna weights for possible interferers comprises the steps of:

determining a signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) for the mobile based on signal strength and interference for different choices of possible interferers; and

selecting antenna weights from the codebook for the possible interferers based on the determined SINR for the mobile.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of using the antenna weights for one or more possible interferers and the antenna weights for the mobile to determine a modulation and coding rate for the mobile comprises the steps of:

computing a potential receive signal strength for the mobile;

computing an interference for one or more possible interferers; and

determining the modulation and coding rate based on the computed receive signal strength and the interference.

8. The method of claim 7 wherein the step of determining the modulation and coding rate comprises the steps of:

determining a signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) over all possible interferers based on the signal strength and the interference for each of the possible interferers; and

determining the modulation and coding rate based on the average SINR over all possible interferers.

9. The method of claim 7 wherein the step of determining the modulation and coding rate comprises the steps of:

determining a possible interferer that provides the highest signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) to the mobile over the resource;

determining the interference for the interferer that provides the highest average SINR; and

determining the modulation and coding rate based on the receive signal strength and the interference for the interferer that provides the highest average SINR.

10. The method of claim 7 wherein the step of determining the modulation and coding rate comprises the steps of:

determining a possible interferer that is closest to the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) over all possible interferers over the resource;

determining the interference for the interferer that is closest to the average SINR over all possible interferers and

determining the modulation and coding rate based on the receive signal strength and the interference for the interferer that is closest to the average SINR over all possible interferers.

11. The method of claim 7 further comprising the step of:

computing a noise estimate for the resource; and

wherein the modulation and coding rate is additionally based on the noise estimate.

12. The method of claim 7 further comprising the step of:

determining a post-reception signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) from the receive signal strength, the interference for one or more possible interferers, and the noise estimate; and

wherein the modulation and coding rate is based on the SINR.

13. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:

transmitting the modulation and coding rate to a base station in a channel quality indication (CQI) message.

14. A mobile to determine a best modulation and coding rate for a resource within a communication system employing adaptive modulation and coding and transmit spatial division multiple access, the mobile performing the steps of:

determining, by the mobile, a codebook choice for the resource;

determining, by the mobile, one or more possible interferers;

determining, by the mobile, antenna weights for the mobile;

determining, by the mobile, antenna weights for the possible interferers based on the codebook choice; and

using, by the mobile, the antenna weights for one or more possible interferers and the antenna weights for the mobile to determine a modulation and coding rate for the mobile.

15. The mobile of claim 14 wherein the antenna weights for the mobile maximizes transmit energy in the direction of the mobile while steering a null in the direction of one or more interferers.

16. The mobile of claim 14 wherein the antenna weights for the possible interferers maximizes transmit energy in the direction of an interferer while steering a null in the direction of the mobile.

17. The mobile of claim 14 wherein the one or more possible interferers are determined based on the codebook choice.

18. A mobile to determine a best modulation and coding rate for a resource within a communication system employing adaptive modulation and coding and transmit spatial division multiple access, the mobile comprising:

a database;

logic circuitry determining a codebook choice for the resource, determining one or more possible interferers, determining antenna weights for the mobile, determining antenna weights for the possible interferers from the database and based on the codebook choice, and using the antenna weights for one or more possible interferers and the antenna weights for the mobile to determine a modulation and coding rate for the mobile.

19. The mobile of claim 18 wherein the antenna weights for the mobile maximizes transmit energy in the direction of the mobile while steering a null in the direction of one or more interferers.

20. The mobile of claim 18 wherein the antenna weights for the possible interferers maximizes transmit energy in the direction of an interferer while steering a null in the direction of the mobile.

Assignments (4)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 21, 2014
From: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
To: GOOGLE TECHNOLOGY HOLDINGS LLC
Reel/Frame 034416/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2012
From: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC.
To: MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Reel/Frame 028829/0856 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 13, 2010
From: MOTOROLA, INC
To: MOTOROLA MOBILITY, INC
Reel/Frame 025673/0558 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2008
From: THOMAS, TIMOTHY A.; GHOSH, AMITABHA; MONDAL, BISHWARUP
To: MOTOROLA, INC.
Reel/Frame 021776/0162 →