IP Library Granted Patent US 8,176,510
Granted Patent B2
US 8,176,510 · App. 12/269,639 · Granted May 8, 2012

Systems and methods for detecting inconsistent user actions and providing feedback

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,176,510
App. No.
12/269,639
Granted
May 8, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

Systems and methods are provided for detecting inconsistent user actions and providing feedback about assets. A user may perform a first action restricting access to a first asset. The system may detect whether a second action performed relative to a second asset that has a similar attribute as the first asset is inconsistent with the first asset. The inconsistency may be detected when the second action removes or is an inaction that does not place access restrictions on the second asset. The system may alert the user about the inconsistency and the user may act on the alert by providing feedback about the inconsistency and/or the first/second asset, ignoring the inconsistency and/or placing an access restriction or other action consistent with the first action relative to the second asset. The user may also provide detailed feedback about an inconsistency or asset through a website accessed on another device.

Claims (82)

1. A method comprising:

receiving, from a first user, a first action performed relative to a first media asset;

receiving a second action performed relative to a second media asset, wherein the second media asset has one or more attributes that are similar to attributes of the first media asset;

detecting an inconsistency between the first action and the second action;

alerting the first user about the inconsistency between the first action and the second action; and

enabling the first user to reverse the first action.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising reporting the detected inconsistency to a content provider for either or both media assets or a sponsor associated with either or both media assets.

3. The method of claim 2 , further comprising providing to the first user an option to view other reports that have previously been sent related to either or both media assets.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second action is an action performed by a user.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

the second action is an action performed by a second user that is different from the first user; and

detecting the inconsistency between the first action and the second action comprises comparing a first profile associated with the first user with a second profile associated with a second user.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein the second action is an addition of the second media asset to a database of available media assets or a modification of the one or more attributes of the second media asset.

7. The method of claim 1 further comprising prompting the first user to reverse the first action.

8. The method of claim 1 further comprising prompting the first user to undo a proper subset of changes resulting from the first action.

9. The method of claim 1 further comprising prompting a user to supply information relating to a reason for the inconsistency.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein prompting the user to supply information comprises displaying a plurality of feedback options, the method further comprising receiving a user selection of at least one of the feedback options.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein at least one of the feedback options provides feedback about the first or second media asset and the feedback option is selected from the group consisting of options related to indecency, rating inaccuracy or inappropriateness, offensiveness to minorities or women, religious intolerance, political incorrectness, animal cruelty, and immorality.

12. The method of claim 10 , wherein at least one of the feedback options allows the user to suggest a rating or sub-rating for the first or second media asset.

13. The method of claim 1 further comprising:

receiving information relating to a reason for the inconsistency from a user; and

supplying the received information to a content provider of either or both media assets or a sponsor associated with either or both media assets.

14. The method of claim 1 wherein the first action restricts access to the first media asset and detecting the inconsistency comprises detecting that the first action is inconsistent with accessibility of the second media asset.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein an attribute of the second media asset that is similar to an attribute of the first media asset is a rating, a sub-rating, a genre, a series membership, a favorites membership, a bookmarked status, a tagged status, a DVR viewing status, a service type, a channel association, a website association, or a general viewing status.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the attribute of the second media asset has a value that is equivalent to a value of the attribute of the first media asset.

17. The method of claim 1 wherein an attribute of the second media asset that is similar to an attribute of the first media asset is a status indicating whether feedback has previously been provided relative to the first media asset.

18. The method of claim 1 wherein the first action or the second action is an inaction.

19. The method of claim 18 wherein the inaction includes not restricting access to the first or second media asset.

20. The method of claim 1 wherein detecting the inconsistency comprises:

retrieving a first set of attributes associated with the first media asset from a memory;

searching among a plurality of media assets for the second media asset having one or more attributes that are similar to the first set of attributes;

comparing the first action with the second action performed concerning the second media asset; and

determining based on the comparison and the one or more attributes that are similar whether the first action is inconsistent with the second action.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein comparing the first action with the second action comprises:

setting a first access restriction for the first media asset; and

determining whether the second media asset contains an access restriction similar to the first access restriction.

22. The method of claim 21 wherein asset restriction information corresponding to the first media asset and the second media asset is stored in a field of a respective asset characteristic data structure.

23. The method of claim 1 further comprising transmitting, to a computer associated with a website, an electronic communication indicating that feedback concerning the inconsistency will be provided by a user.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein the electronic communication identifies the user and the first media asset.

25. The method of claim 23 wherein the electronic communication is transmitted from a television equipment device in response to a user selection of an option to provide more feedback.

26. The method of claim 23 wherein the feedback concerning the inconsistency is provided to the website by the user in a textual format.

27. A system comprising control circuitry configured to:

receive, from a first user, a first action performed relative to a first media asset;

receive a second action performed relative to a second media asset, wherein the second media asset has one or more attributes that are similar to attributes of the first media asset;

detect an inconsistency between the first action and the second action;

alert the first user about the inconsistency between the first action and the second action; and

enable the first user to reverse the first action.

28. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to report the detected inconsistency to a content provider for either or both media assets or a sponsor associated with either or both media assets.

29. The system of claim 28 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to provide to the first user an option to view other reports that have previously been sent related to either or both media assets.

30. The system of claim 27 , wherein the second action is an action performed by a user.

31. The system of claim 27 , wherein:

the second action is an action performed by a second user that is different from the first user; and

the control circuitry is further configured to compare a first profile associated with the first user with a second profile associated with a second user.

32. The system of claim 27 , wherein the second action is an addition of the second media asset to a database of available media assets or a modification of the one or more attributes of the second media asset.

33. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to prompt the first user to reverse the first action.

34. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to prompt the first user to undo a proper subset of changes resulting from the first action.

35. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to prompt a user to supply information relating to a reason for the inconsistency.

36. The system of claim 35 further comprising a display device, wherein the control circuitry is further configured to display on the display device a plurality of feedback options and receive a user selection of at least one of the feedback options.

37. The system of claim 36 wherein at least one of the feedback options provides feedback about the first or second media asset and the feedback option is selected from the group consisting of options related to indecency, rating inaccuracy or inappropriateness, offensiveness to minorities or women, religious intolerance, political incorrectness, animal cruelty, and immorality.

38. The system of claim 36 , wherein at least one of the feedback options allows the user to suggest a rating or sub-rating for the first or second media asset.

39. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

receive information relating to a reason for the inconsistency from a user; and

supply the received information to a content provider of either or both media assets or a sponsor associated with either or both media assets.

40. The system of claim 27 wherein the first action restricts access to the first media asset and wherein the control circuitry is further configured to detect that the first action is inconsistent with accessibility of the second media asset.

41. The system of claim 27 wherein an attribute of the second media asset that is similar to an attribute of the first media asset is a rating, a sub-rating, a genre, a series membership, a favorites membership, a bookmarked status, a tagged status, a DVR viewing status, a service type, a channel association, a website association, or a general viewing status.

42. The system of claim 41 wherein the attribute of the second media asset has a value that is equivalent to a value of the attribute of the first media asset.

43. The system of claim 27 wherein an attribute of the second media asset that is similar to an attribute of the first media asset is a status indicating whether feedback has previously been provided relative to the first media asset.

44. The system of claim 27 wherein the first action or the second action is an inaction.

45. The system of claim 44 wherein the inaction includes not restricting access to the first or second media asset.

46. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

retrieve a first set of attributes associated with the first media asset from a memory;

search among a plurality of media assets for the second media asset having one or more attributes that are similar to the first set of attributes;

compare the first action with the second action performed concerning the second media asset; and

determine based on the comparison and the one or more attributes that are similar whether the first action is inconsistent with the second action.

47. The system of claim 46 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to:

set a first access restriction for the first media asset; and

determine whether the second media asset contains an access restriction similar to the first access restriction.

48. The system of claim 47 wherein asset restriction information corresponding to the first media asset and the second media asset is stored in a field of a respective asset characteristic data structure.

49. The system of claim 27 wherein the control circuitry is further configured to transmit, to a computer associated with a website, an electronic communication indicating that feedback concerning the inconsistency will be provided by a user.

50. The system of claim 49 wherein the electronic communication identifies the user and the first media asset.

51. The system of claim 49 wherein the electronic communication is transmitted from a television equipment device in response to a user selection of an option to provide more feedback.

52. The system of claim 49 wherein the feedback concerning the inconsistency is provided to the website by the user in a textual format.

Assignments (9)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2020
From: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC
To: ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; TIVO SOLUTIONS, INC.; VEVEO, INC.
Reel/Frame 053458/0749 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2020
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; TIVO SOLUTIONS, INC.; VEVEO, INC.
Reel/Frame 053481/0790 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jun 1, 2020
From: ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; TIVO SOLUTIONS INC.; VEVEO, INC.; INVENSAS CORPORATION; INVENSAS BONDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; TESSERA, INC.; TESSERA ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; DTS, INC.; PHORUS, INC.; IBIQUITY DIGITAL CORPORATION
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 053468/0001 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 25, 2019
From: ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; TIVO SOLUTIONS, INC.; VEVEO, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 051110/0006 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Nov 25, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: APTIV DIGITAL INC.; GEMSTAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; INDEX SYSTEMS INC.; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; SONIC SOLUTIONS LLC; STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC.; UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC.; VEVEO, INC.
Reel/Frame 051145/0090 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 22, 2019
From: ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; TIVO SOLUTIONS, INC.; VEVEO, INC.
To: HPS INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 051143/0468 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jul 24, 2014
From: APTIV DIGITAL, INC.; GEMSTAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; INDEX SYSTEMS INC.; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; SONIC SOLUTIONS LLC; STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC.; UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC.; VEVEO, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 033407/0035 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Jul 24, 2014
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ALL MEDIA GUIDE, LLC; APTIV DIGITAL, INC.; GEMSTAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION; INDEX SYSTEMS INC.; ROVI CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC.; ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION; STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC.; TV GUIDE INTERNATIONAL, INC.; UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC.
Reel/Frame 033396/0001 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 13, 2011
From: APTIV DIGITAL, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; GEMSTAR DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; INDEX SYSTEMS INC, A BRITISH VIRGIN ISLANDS COMPANY; ROVI CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ROVI GUIDES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ROVI SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; ROVI TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, A DELAWARE CORPORATION; STARSIGHT TELECAST, INC., A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION; UNITED VIDEO PROPERTIES, INC., A DELAWARE CORPORATION
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 027039/0168 →