IP Library Granted Patent US 7,800,533
Granted Patent B2
US 7,800,533 · App. 12/276,852 · Granted Sep 21, 2010

System and method for determining falsified geographic location of a mobile device

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,800,533
App. No.
12/276,852
Granted
Sep 21, 2010
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for determining whether an estimated location of a wireless device includes one or more forged satellite measurements. An estimated location of the wireless device may be determined from signals received from a first set of satellites, and a set of residuals obtained as a function of the estimated location. The obtained set of residuals may then be compared to a reference set of residuals. If the comparison between the obtained set and reference set of residuals is less than a predetermined threshold, then the estimated location may be identified as having one or more forged satellite measurements.

Claims (39)

1. A method for determining whether an estimated location of a wireless device includes one or more forged satellite measurements, comprising the steps of:

(a) determining an estimated location of the wireless device from signals received from a first set of satellites;

(b) obtaining a set of residuals as a function of the estimated location;

(c) comparing the obtained set of residuals to a reference set of residuals; and

(d) identifying the estimated location as having one or more forged satellite measurements if the comparison between the obtained set and reference set of residuals is less than a predetermined threshold.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the obtained set of residuals are calculated by the following relationship:

{circumflex over (v)}=A{circumflex over (x)}−b

where v represents the set of residuals, A represents partial derivatives of a functional model, x represents the estimated location, and b represents an observational model.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of comparing further comprises comparing the sum of the squared residuals (“SSR”) for the obtained set to the SSR for the reference set.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of comparing further comprises comparing the sum of the squared residuals (“SSR”) for the obtained set to an average SSR for a plurality of reference sets.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the reference set of residuals is provided by a database having information from a reference station network.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the reference station network includes a plurality of geographically dispersed reference stations.

7. The method of claim 5 wherein the reference station network includes fixed reference stations, mobile reference stations, or combinations thereof.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the estimated location is determined as a function of coarse acquisition (“C/A”) code phase shift information.

9. The method of claim 1 wherein the estimated location is determined as a function of Doppler information.

10. The method of claim 1 wherein the estimated location is determined as a function of signals provided by a cellular network.

11. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of determining another estimated location of the wireless device from signals received from a second set of satellites, the second set excluding a satellite having a forged measurement.

12. The method of claim 1 further comprising the step of:

(e) repeating steps (a) through (d) using signals received from a second set of satellites.

13. The method of claim 12 wherein the second set of satellites is a subset of the first set of satellites.

14. The method of claim 12 wherein the second set of satellites is mutually exclusive of the first set of satellites.

15. The method of claim 1 wherein the wireless device is selected from the group consisting of: cellular device, text messaging device, computer, portable computer, vehicle locating device, vehicle security device, communication device, and wireless transceiver.

16. The method of claim 1 wherein the satellites are a part of a Global Navigation Satellite System (“GNSS”).

17. The method of claim 16 wherein the GNSS is selected from the group consisting of: a Global Positioning System (“GPS”), Galileo system, GLONASS system, Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (“QZSS”), Beidou satellite system, Compass satellite system, and combinations thereof.

18. In a method for determining whether an estimated location of a wireless device includes a forged satellite measurement, the method comprising receiving at the wireless device signals from a plurality of satellites and determining an estimated location of the wireless device from the received signals, the improvement comprising comparing a set of residuals obtained from the estimated location with a reference set of residuals, and identifying the estimated location as having a forged satellite measurement if the comparison is less than a predetermined threshold.

19. A system for determining whether an estimated location of a wireless device includes one or more forged satellite measurements, comprising:

(a) circuitry for determining an estimated location of the wireless device from signals received from a set of satellites;

(b) circuitry for calculating a set of residuals as a function of the estimated location;

(c) a database having information from a reference station network;

(d) circuitry for comparing the obtained set of residuals to a reference set of residuals provided by the reference network; and

(e) circuitry for identifying the estimated location as having one or more forged satellite measurements if the comparison between the obtained set and reference set of residuals is less than a predetermined threshold.

20. The system of claim 19 wherein the reference network includes a plurality of geographically dispersed reference stations.

21. The system of claim 19 wherein the reference network includes fixed reference stations, mobile reference stations, or combinations thereof.

22. The system of claim 19 wherein the estimated location is determined as a function of coarse acquisition (“C/A”) code phase shift information.

23. The system of claim 19 wherein the estimated location is determined as a function of Doppler information.

24. The system of claim 19 wherein the estimated location is determined as a function of signals provided by a cellular network.

25. The system of claim 19 wherein the wireless device is selected from the group consisting of: cellular device, text messaging device, computer, portable computer, vehicle locating device, vehicle security device, communication device, and wireless transceiver.

26. The system of claim 19 wherein the satellites are a part of a Global Navigation Satellite System (“GNSS”).

27. The system of claim 26 wherein the GNSS is selected from the group consisting of: a Global Positioning System (“GPS”), Galileo system, GLONASS system, Quasi-Zenith Satellite System (“QZSS”), Beidou satellite system, Compass satellite system, and combinations thereof.

Assignments (12)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: REDWOOD SYSTEMS, INC.; ALLEN TELECOM LLC; ANDREW LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 048840/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 9, 2019
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: REDWOOD SYSTEMS, INC.; ALLEN TELECOM LLC; ANDREW LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; COMMSCOPE TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Reel/Frame 049260/0001 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Mar 3, 2016
From: COMTECH EF DATA CORP.; COMTECH XICOM TECHNOLOGY, INC.; COMTECH MOBILE DATACOM CORPORATION; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
To: CITIBANK N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 037993/0001 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 6, 2015
From: MAPLE ACQUISITION LLC
To: TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 037057/0781 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jul 2, 2013
From: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; ANDREW LLC
To: MAPLE ACQUISITION LLC
Reel/Frame 030739/0969 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Jun 21, 2013
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; ANDREW LLC
Reel/Frame 030656/0973 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Jun 21, 2013
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; ANDREW LLC
Reel/Frame 030656/0922 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 4, 2011
From: ALLEN TELECOM LLC, A DELAWARE LLC; ANDREW LLC, A DELAWARE LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC OF NORTH CAROLINA, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 026272/0543 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2011
From: ALLEN TELECOM LLC, A DELAWARE LLC; ANDREW LLC, A DELAWARE LLC; COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA, A NORTH CAROLINA CORPORATION
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 026276/0363 →
PATENT RELEASE Recorded Feb 3, 2011
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
To: COMMSCOPE, INC. OF NORTH CAROLINA; ALLEN TELECOM LLC; ANDREW LLC (F/K/A ANDREW CORPORATION)
Reel/Frame 026039/0005 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2009
From: HARPER, NEIL; THOMSON, MARTIN
To: ANDREW LLC
Reel/Frame 023478/0012 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Jan 16, 2009
From: COMMSCOPE OF NORTH CAROLINA; ANDREW LLC
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Reel/Frame 022118/0955 →