IP Library Granted Patent US 8,125,524
Granted Patent B2
US 8,125,524 · App. 12/333,483 · Granted Feb 28, 2012

System and method for the detection of de-interlacing of scaled video

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,125,524
App. No.
12/333,483
Granted
Feb 28, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system, apparatus, and method are provided for a video detector that computes a measure of how much a given video content resembles one of a de-interlaced video content or a progressive video content. More particularly, the present invention determines the position of original and interpolated lines and the scaling factor of an input content whenever that content was scaled after de-interlacing.

Claims (19)

1. A method for detection of de-interlacing, comprising:

providing a set of lines (y,n)∈S and a discriminating function D(y,n) for the provided set, where n is a specific frame number and y is a line number within the specified frame;

defining an odd grid as a subset of pixels to consist of lines (y,n)∈S with line number y in frames with frame number n where sum y+n is odd and defining an even grid to consist of lines (y,n)∈S with line number y in frames with frame number n where sum y+n is even;

evaluating a pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) for each of the lines (y,n)∈S ;

computing an average A1 of the evaluated discriminating function D(y,n) on a subset of pixels belonging to the even grid and average A2 of the evaluated discriminating function D(y,n) on a subset of pixels belonging to odd grid;

computing a de-interlacing quality measure based on the difference between A1 and A2; and

classifying the even grid as the grid of original lines if A1>A2, otherwise classifying the odd grid as the grid of original lines.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein where the pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) is based on one of local spatial, temporal pixel correlations, and local spatial and temporal pixel correlations.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein where the pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) is based on a weighted sum of different specific discriminating functions.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) further comprises at least one of specific discriminating function proportional to a relative/additional amount of high frequency detail in the given line with respect to a specific neighboring line in an analyzed previous or next frame.

5. An apparatus for detection of de-interlacing, comprising:

a module that performs a pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) on a subset of the set of lines (y,n)∈S where n is a specific frame number and y is a line number within the specified frame,

a grid determination module that defines an odd grid as a subset of pixels consisting of lines (y,n)∈S with line number y in frames with frame number n where sum y+n is odd and defining an even grid as a subset of pixels consisting of lines (y,n)∈S with line number y in frames with frame number n where sum y+n is even;

an averaging module that computes an average A1 by executing the discriminating function D(y,n) on the pixels belonging to the even grid and average A2 by executing the discriminating function D(y,n) on a the pixels belonging to the odd grid;

a comparison module that outputs a de-interlacing quality measure based on a comparison between the values A1 and A2; and

a classification module that classifies the even grid as the grid of original lines if A1>A2, and otherwise classifies the odd grid as the grid of original lines.

6. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) is based on a weighted sum of different specific discriminating functions.

7. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) is based on one of local spatial, temporal pixel correlations, and local spatial and temporal pixel correlations.

8. The apparatus of claim 5 wherein the pre-set discriminating function D(y,n) further comprises at least one of specific discriminating function proportional to a relative/additional amount of high frequency detail in the given line with respect to a specific neighboring line in an analyzed previous or next frame.

Assignments (10)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042985 FRAME 0001. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded Oct 22, 2019
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 051029/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded Oct 22, 2019
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 051029/0387 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded Oct 22, 2019
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 051030/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12298143 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 042762 FRAME 0145. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded Oct 22, 2019
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 051145/0184 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2019
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 050745/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12681366 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 039361 FRAME 0212. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded May 9, 2017
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 042762/0145 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12681366 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded May 9, 2017
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 042985/0001 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVE APPLICATION 12092129 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 038017 FRAME 0058. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT. Recorded Jul 14, 2016
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 039361/0212 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT SUPPLEMENT Recorded Mar 7, 2016
From: NXP B.V.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 038017/0058 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE THE EXECUTION DATE OF DMITRY ZNAMENSKIY PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 022028 FRAME 0611. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE THE EXECUTION DATE OF DMITRY ZNAMENSKIY FROM AUGUST 12, 2008 TO DECEMBER 12, 2008. Recorded Feb 23, 2012
From: ZNAMENSKIY, DMITRY; CORDES, CLAUS NICO
To: NXP B.V.
Reel/Frame 027752/0949 →