IP Library Granted Patent US 8,091,416
Granted Patent B2
US 8,091,416 · App. 12/355,094 · Granted Jan 10, 2012

Robust design of diagnostic enabling conditions for SCR NOx conversion efficiency monitor

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,091,416
App. No.
12/355,094
Granted
Jan 10, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for controlling a malfunction catalyst diagnostic test that determines a malfunction status of a catalyst within a selective catalytic reduction device includes monitoring an exhaust gas flow within an aftertreatment system, estimating an effect of the exhaust gas flow on an estimated reductant storage on a catalyst within the selective catalytic reduction device, and selectively disabling the malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon the estimating the effect of the exhaust gas flow on the estimated reductant storage.

Claims (101)

1. Method for controlling a malfunction catalyst diagnostic test within a powertrain comprising an internal combustion engine and an aftertreatment system including a selective catalytic reduction device, wherein said test determines a malfunction status of a catalyst within said selective catalytic reduction device, said method comprising:

monitoring an exhaust gas flow within said aftertreatment system;

estimating an effect of said exhaust gas flow on an estimated reductant storage on a catalyst within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon said estimating said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein said estimated reductant storage comprises an estimated ammonia storage.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device;

monitoring a space velocity of said exhaust gas flow within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

monitoring a reductant in said exhaust gas flow.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein said monitoring said reductant in said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring injection of urea into said exhaust gas flow.

5. The method of claim 3 , wherein said monitoring said reductant in said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring ammonia produced by catalyzing components of said exhaust gas flow.

6. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a reductant storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device;

wherein said estimating said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises determining said estimated reductant storage; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon said estimating said effect comprises disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test if said estimated reductant storage is less than said reductant storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device.

7. The method of claim 1 , wherein said estimating said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises determining said estimated reductant storage;

said method further comprising evaluating an accuracy of said estimated reductant storage; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon said estimating said effect comprises disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test if said accuracy of said estimated reductant storage degrades by more than a threshold accuracy measure.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a catalyst bed temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said catalyst bed temperature.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein said disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test comprises disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test if said catalyst bed temperature exceeds a high temperature threshold.

10. The method of claim 8 , wherein said disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test comprises disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test if said catalyst bed temperature is less than a low temperature threshold.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a catalyst bed temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device;

determining an average catalyst bed temperature through a time period; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said average catalyst bed temperature and a normal catalyst bed temperature operating range.

12. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a rate of temperature change within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said rate of temperature change.

13. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device;

monitoring a rate of temperature change within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said temperature and said rate of temperature change.

14. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring an engine speed rate of change; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said engine speed rate of change.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein said monitoring said engine speed rate of change comprises monitoring an engine fueling rate; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said engine fueling rate falling below a threshold engine fueling rate.

16. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring initiation of an aftertreatment regeneration cycle; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said initiation of said aftertreatment regeneration cycle.

17. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a NO to NO 2 ratio; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said ratio.

18. The method of claim 1 , further comprising determining a desired reductant storage value based upon said monitoring said exhaust gas flow;

wherein said estimating said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises determining said estimated reductant storage;

said method further comprising determining a control error based upon said desired reductant storage value and said estimated reductant storage; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said control error.

19. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring an engine out NOx value;

said method further comprising diagnosing an engine out NOx fault based upon said engine out NOx value; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said engine out NOx fault.

20. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device;

wherein said estimating said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises determining said estimated reductant storage; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said temperature and said estimated reductant storage.

21. The method of claim 1 , wherein said monitoring said exhaust gas flow comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

monitoring a space velocity within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test is based upon said temperature and said space velocity.

22. The method of claim 21 , wherein said selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon said temperature and said space velocity comprises:

classifying operation of said selective catalytic reduction device as operating within one of a stable region and a transitory region based upon said temperature and said space velocity;

if said classifying indicates said stable region, then selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon a stable disabling criteria; and

if said classifying indicates said transitory region, then selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon a transitory disabling criteria.

23. Method for controlling a malfunction catalyst diagnostic test within a powertrain comprising an internal combustion engine and an aftertreatment system including a selective catalytic reduction device, wherein said test determines a malfunction status of a catalyst within said selective catalytic reduction device, said method comprising:

monitoring an estimated reductant storage on a catalyst within said selective catalytic reduction device;

comparing said estimated reductant storage to an reductant storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device; and

selectively disabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test if said estimated reductant storage is less than said reductant storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device.

24. The method of claim 23 , wherein said estimated reduction storage comprises an estimated ammonia storage; and

wherein said reductant storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device comprises an ammonia storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device.

25. The method of claim 23 , wherein said monitoring said estimated reductant storage on said catalyst comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device;

monitoring a space velocity of an exhaust gas flow within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

determining said estimated reductant storage based upon said temperature and said space velocity.

26. The method of claim 23 , wherein said monitoring said estimated reductant storage on said catalyst comprises:

monitoring introduction of a reductant to said selective catalytic reduction device; and

wherein said determining said estimated reductant storage is further based upon said monitoring said introduction.

27. The method of claim 23 , wherein said monitoring said estimated reductant storage on said catalyst comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

estimating an effect of said temperature upon said estimated reductant storage.

28. The method of claim 23 , wherein said monitoring said estimated reductant storage on said catalyst comprises:

monitoring a temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device;

monitoring a space velocity within said selective catalytic reduction device; and

estimating an effect of said temperature and said space velocity upon said estimated reductant storage.

29. The method of claim 23 , further comprising selectively enabling said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test after a time period calibrated to restore said estimated reductant storage above said reductant storage required to efficiently operate said selective catalytic reduction device.

30. Apparatus for controlling a malfunction catalyst diagnostic test within a powertrain comprising an internal combustion engine and an aftertreatment system including a selective catalytic reduction device, wherein said test determines a malfunction status of a catalyst within said selective catalytic reduction device, said apparatus comprising:

said selective catalytic reduction device;

sensors monitoring an exhaust gas flow within said aftertreatment system; and

a control module configured to

monitor said sensors,

estimate an effect of said exhaust gas flow on an estimated reductant storage on a catalyst within said selective catalytic reduction device, and

selectively disable said malfunction catalyst diagnostic test based upon said estimate of said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage.

31. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said sensors are configured to monitor an exhaust gas flow temperature upstream of said selective catalytic reduction device, to monitor an engine output allowing estimation of a space velocity within said selective catalytic reduction device, and to monitor introduction of a reductant in said exhaust gas flow.

32. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said control module configured to estimate said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises use of a virtual NOx sensor.

33. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said control module configured to estimate said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises said control module configured to estimate a catalyst bed temperature.

34. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said control module configured to estimate said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises said control module configured to evaluate effects of temperature within said selective catalytic reduction device.

35. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said control module configured to estimate said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises said control module configured to evaluate effects of a rate of temperature change within said selective catalytic reduction device.

36. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said control module configured to estimate said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises said control module configured to evaluate effects of a rate of engine speed change within said selective catalytic reduction device.

37. The apparatus of claim 30 , wherein said control module configured to estimate said effect of said exhaust gas flow on said estimated reductant storage comprises said control module configured to evaluate effects of temperature and space velocity within said selective catalytic reduction device.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 7, 2014
From: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 034185/0789 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Feb 10, 2011
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS LLC
Reel/Frame 025781/0245 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Nov 8, 2010
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: WILMINGTON TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 025324/0515 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 5, 2010
From: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025315/0046 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 4, 2010
From: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 025246/0056 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 28, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UAW RETIREE MEDICAL BENEFITS TRUST
Reel/Frame 023162/0237 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 27, 2009
From: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
To: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY
Reel/Frame 023156/0313 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 25, 2009
From: WANG, YUE-YUNG; YANAKIEV, OGNYAN N.; SOLBRIG, CHARLES E.
To: GM GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY OPERATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 022448/0264 →