IP Library Granted Patent US 8,170,895
Granted Patent B1
US 8,170,895 · App. 12/355,449 · Granted May 1, 2012

System and method for probate prediction

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,170,895
App. No.
12/355,449
Granted
May 1, 2012
Kind
B1
Abstract

A computer assisted method includes selecting a sample of accounts from a historical database of accounts corresponding to deceased debtors, The sample indicates whether or not an estate was found for each deceased debtor. A comprehensive set of credit related variables corresponding to the accounts is obtained from a first source. A comprehensive set of demographic related variables corresponding to the accounts is obtained from a second source. The variables are mapped to the accounts and a computer executable model is created by identifying a subset of variables from the sets of variables and using the subset of variables and sample of accounts such that the model provides a prediction of whether or not an estate exists for a given deceased debtor.

Claims (43)

1. A computer assisted method comprising:

selecting a sample of accounts from a historical database of accounts corresponding to deceased debtors, the sample indicating whether or not an estate was found for each deceased debtor;

obtaining a comprehensive set of credit related variables corresponding to the accounts from a first source;

obtaining a comprehensive set of demographic related variables corresponding to the accounts from a second source;

obtaining individual characteristic variables for each deceased debtor;

mapping the credit related variables, demographic related variables, and the individual characteristic variable variables to the accounts via the computer; and

creating a computer executable model via the computer by identifying a subset of variables from the sets of variables and using the subset of variables and sample of accounts such that the model provides a prediction of whether or not an estate exists for a given deceased debtor.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein selecting a sample of accounts further comprises keeping a sample slice out of the sample for use in testing the model.

3. The method of claim 2 wherein the sample of accounts is selected from a group of accounts processed in accordance with a constant method of identifying whether or not the deceased debtors had estates.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the first source comprises at least one credit profile source.

5. The method of claim 1 wherein the second source comprises at least one census database.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the demographic data comprises at least a zipcode and income information.

7. The method of claim 1 wherein the historical database of accounts comprises further variables used to create the model.

8. The method of claim 1 wherein the model comprises a probit model.

9. The method of claim 8 wherein the probit model is created using a computer assisted manual intuitive model.

10. The method of claim 8 wherein the probit model is created using a stepwise logistical process.

11. The method of claim 10 wherein the stepwise logistical process comprises;

running the model from the sets of variables;

removing variables that appear to be duplicative;

running the model without the duplicative variables; and

repeating the removing duplicative variables and running of the model in an empirical process to identify a preliminary subset of variables.

12. The method of claim 11 and further comprising:

forcing the subset of variables to be in the model and iteratively:

selecting multiple variables not in the subset to run the model with the subset of variables such that the model identifies further significant variables;

adding the further significant variables to the subset of variables; and

removing selected variables that appear to be duplicative from the subset of variables.

13. The method of claim 1 wherein the model produces a z score for a selected deceased debtor.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the z score is representative of the likelihood that an account will have an estate, and a correspondingly increased chance of collecting a debt associated with the deceased debtor.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein the z score is transformed using the standard normal distribution and a scaling equation to produce a probate prediction score.

16. A computer executable model stored on a computer readable storage device, the model comprising:

a set of variables selected from credit and demographic data sources, the variables selected from a method comprising:

selecting a sample of accounts from a historical database of accounts corresponding to deceased debtors, the sample indicating whether or not an estate was found for each deceased debtor;

obtaining a comprehensive set of credit related variables corresponding to the accounts from a first source;

obtaining a comprehensive set of demographic related variables corresponding to the accounts from a second source;

mapping the sets of variables to the accounts; and

creating a computer executable model by identifying a subset of variables from the sets of variables and using the subset of variables and sample of accounts such that the model provides a prediction of whether or not an estate exists for a given deceased debtor.

17. A computer executable model of claim 16 wherein the code comprises a probit model created using a computer assisted manual intuitive model.

18. A computer implemented method comprising:

associating credit and demographic data corresponding to a deceased debtor to a deceased debtor account stored on a computer readable storage device;

running on a programmed computer, a statistical model trained on historical deceased debtor data against the deceased debtor account; and

identifying via the programmed computer, a likelihood that there is an estate corresponding to the deceased debtor account.

19. The method of claim 18 and further comprising performing the method on multiple debtor accounts and identify priority debtor accounts that are more likely to have an estate and thus an increased chance of collection to obtain higher collection yields.

20. The method of claim 18 wherein a low probate prediction score identifies an account as a candidate for reduced collection efforts.

Assignments (8)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 13, 2025
From: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC
To: FORTE, LLC
Reel/Frame 070505/0616 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNOR NAME FROM FORTE LLC TO FORTE, LLC PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 70481 FRAME 641. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE SECURITY AGREEMENT. Recorded Mar 13, 2025
From: DATA AND CONTACT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC; DCM SERVICES, LLC; FORTE, LLC
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070513/0323 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 12, 2025
From: DATA AND CONTACT MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS, LLC; DCM SERVICES, LLC; FORTE LLC
To: MIDCAP FINANCIAL TRUST, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 070481/0641 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Mar 30, 2021
From: REGIONS BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: FORTE, LLC
Reel/Frame 055775/0887 →
NOTICE OF GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS Recorded Mar 29, 2021
From: FORTE, LLC
To: ALTER DOMUS (US) LLC, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 055820/0670 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2020
From: FORTE, LLC
To: REGIONS BANK, AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 051910/0725 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 25, 2020
From: CIBC BANK USA (F/K/A THE PRIVATEBANK AND TRUST COMPANY), AS AGENT
To: FORTE, LLC
Reel/Frame 051916/0443 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2017
From: FORTE, LLC
To: THE PRIVATEBANK AND TRUST COMPANY
Reel/Frame 041090/0862 →