IP Library Granted Patent US 7,978,135
Granted Patent B2
US 7,978,135 · App. 12/370,224 · Granted Jul 12, 2011

Antenna beam forming systems/methods using unconstrained phase response

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,978,135
App. No.
12/370,224
Granted
Jul 12, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

Beamforming methods for operating a transceiver including an antenna having a plurality of antenna feed elements include defining a plurality of real valued antenna gain constraint values associated with a plurality of geographic constraint points within a geographic region, and generating complex valued antenna feed element weights that result in complex antenna gain values at the geographic constraint points based on the corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values. An antenna beam is formed from the antenna to the geographic region using the complex valued antenna feed element weights, and information is transmitted over the antenna beam.

Claims (221)

1. A method of operating a transceiver including an antenna having a plurality of antenna feed elements, comprising:

defining a plurality of real valued antenna gain constraint values associated with a plurality of geographic constraint points within a geographic region;

generating complex valued antenna feed element weights that result in complex antenna gain values at the geographic constraint points based on the corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values;

forming an antenna beam from the antenna to the geographic region using the complex valued antenna feed element weights; and

transmitting information over the antenna beam.

2. The method of claim 1 , wherein the complex antenna gain values at the geographic constraint points having real components that are equal to the corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the complex valued antenna feed element weights comprises:

defining a constraint function that relates the real valued antenna gain constraint values to the complex valued antenna feed element weights.

4. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

forming a cost function that is related to a total received power; and

evaluating the constraint function to find a set of complex valued antenna feed element weights that reduces the cost function.

5. The method of claim 4 , wherein the cost function comprises:

W H Ryw =MIN

wherein w is a vector of M feed element weights, Ry is an M×M covariance matrix for the M feed elements, and MIN is a scalar value.

6. The method of claim 4 , wherein the constraint function comprises:

C H w=f

wherein w is a vector of M feed element weights, C is an M×K constant matrix containing responses of the M feed elements at K constraint points and f is a desired response vector at the K constraint points.

7. The method of claim 4 , wherein evaluating the constraint function to find a set of complex valued antenna feed element weights that reduces the cost function comprises:

forming a combined expression for the constraint function and the cost function using Lagrange multipliers;

differentiating the combined expression with respect to the complex valued antenna feed element weights;

setting the differentiated combined expression equal to zero and obtaining the complex valued antenna feed element weights in terms of the Lagrange multipliers; and

substituting the complex valued antenna feed element weights into the constraint function.

8. The method of claim 1 , further comprising measuring a complex antenna gain value;

transmitting the measured complex antenna gain values to the transceiver; and

adjusting the complex valued antenna feed element weights in response to the measured complex antenna gain value.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein generating the complex valued antenna feed element weights comprises:

evaluating a cost function that comprises squared differences between real components of the complex antenna gain values and the real valued antenna gain constraint values.

10. The method of claim 9 , wherein the real valued antenna gain constraint values comprise soft constraint values.

11. The method of claim 10 , wherein the cost function comprises:

n

=

1

N

y

n

y

n

*

+

p

=

1

P

(

Re

{

y

p

}

-

f

p

)

2

=

MIN

wherein y′ n denotes composite amplitude response values at N geographic constraint points having zero amplitude antenna gain constraint values, y″ p denotes composite amplitude response values at P geographic constraint points having non-zero amplitude antenna gain constraint values, and f p denotes desired real amplitude components at the P geographic constraint points.

12. The method of claim 11 , further comprising weighting composite amplitude response values to emphasize respective geographic constraint points based on their relative geographic importance.

13. The method of claim 12 , wherein the cost function comprises:

n

=

1

N

c

n

y

n

y

n

*

+

p

=

1

P

c

p

(

Re

{

y

p

}

-

f

p

)

2

=

MIN

wherein c′ n and c″ n comprise user-defined weighting vectors.

14. The method of claim 9 comprising generating a set of complex antenna feed element weights that reduces the cost function.

15. A transceiver, comprising:

an antenna having a plurality of antenna feed elements; and

an electronics system including a beam former configured to generate complex valued antenna feed element weights that result in complex antenna gain values associated with a plurality of geographic constraint points within a geographic region of the antenna based on corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values defined for the plurality of geographic constraint points, and to form an antenna beam from the antenna to the geographic region using the complex valued antenna feed element weights.

16. The transceiver of claim 15 , wherein the complex antenna gain values at the geographic constraint points have real components that are equal to the corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values.

17. The transceiver of claim 15 , wherein the beam former is further configured to evaluate a constraint function that relates the real valued antenna gain constraint values to the complex valued antenna feed element weights.

18. The transceiver of claim 17 , wherein the beam former is further configured to form a cost function that is related to a total received power, and to evaluate the constraint function to find a set of complex valued antenna feed element weights that reduces the cost function.

19. The transceiver of claim 18 , wherein the cost function comprises:

w H Ryw =MIN

wherein w is a vector of M feed element weights, Ry is an M×M covariance matrix for the M feed elements, and MIN is a scalar value.

20. The transceiver of claim 18 , wherein the constraint function comprises:

C H w=f

wherein w is a vector of M feed element weights, C is an M×K constant matrix containing responses of the M feed elements at K constraint points and f is a desired response vector at the K constraint points.

21. The transceiver of claim 18 , wherein the beam former is further configured to evaluate the constraint function to find a set of complex valued antenna feed element weights that reduces the cost function by forming a combined expression for the constraint function and the cost function using Lagrange multipliers, differentiating the combined expression with respect to the complex valued antenna feed element weights, setting the differentiated combined expression equal to zero and obtaining the complex valued antenna feed element weights in terms of the Lagrange multipliers, and substituting the complex valued antenna feed element weights into the constraint function.

22. The transceiver of claim 15 , wherein the beam former is further configured to receive a measured complex antenna gain value to the transceiver, and to adjust the complex valued antenna feed element weights in response to the measured complex antenna gain value.

23. The transceiver of claim 15 , wherein the beam former is configured to generate the complex valued antenna feed element weights by evaluating a cost function that comprises squared differences between real components of the complex antenna gain values and the real valued antenna gain constraint values.

24. The transceiver of claim 23 , wherein the real valued antenna gain constraint values comprise soft constraint values.

25. The transceiver of claim 24 , wherein the cost function comprises:

n

=

1

N

y

n

y

n

*

+

p

=

1

P

(

Re

{

y

p

}

-

f

p

)

2

=

MIN

wherein y′ n denotes composite amplitude response values at N geographic constraint points having zero amplitude antenna gain constraint values, y″ p denotes composite amplitude response values at P geographic constraint points having non-zero amplitude antenna gain constraint values, and f p denotes desired real amplitude components at the P geographic constraint points.

26. The transceiver of claim 25 , wherein the beam former is further configured to weight composite amplitude response values to emphasize respective geographic constraint points based on their relative geographic importance.

27. The transceiver of claim 26 , wherein the cost function comprises:

n

=

1

N

c

n

y

n

y

n

*

+

p

=

1

P

c

p

(

Re

{

y

p

}

-

f

p

)

2

=

MIN

wherein c′ n and c″ n comprise user-defined weighting vectors.

28. The transceiver of claim 23 , wherein the beam former is configured to generate a set of complex antenna feed element weights that reduces the cost function.

29. A communications satellite, comprising:

an antenna having a plurality of antenna feed elements; and

an electronics system including a beam former configured to generate complex valued antenna feed element weights that result in complex antenna gain values associated with a plurality of geographic constraint points within a geographic region of the antenna based on corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values defined for the plurality of geographic constraint points, and to form an antenna beam from the antenna to the geographic region using the complex valued antenna feed element weights.

30. A satellite gateway, comprising:

an electronics system including a beam former configured to generate complex valued antenna feed element weights for antenna feed elements of an antenna of a remote satellite that result in complex antenna gain values associated with a plurality of geographic constraint points within a geographic region of the satellite antenna based on corresponding real valued antenna gain constraint values defined for the plurality of geographic constraint points, and to transmit the complex valued antenna feed element weights to the satellite for use in forming an antenna beam from the satellite antenna to the geographic region.

Assignments (18)
ASSIGNMENT OF AND AMENDMENT TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENTS Recorded Dec 13, 2024
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION; LIGADO NETWORKS LLC; ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 069631/0485 →
U.S. ASSIGNMENT OF AND AMENDMENT TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENTS Recorded Mar 3, 2023
From: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS EXISTING COLLATERAL AGENT
To: U.S. BANK TRUST COMPANY, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS SUCCESSOR COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 062952/0826 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Dec 28, 2022
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 062230/0806 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 30, 2020
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 054262/0207 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 30, 2020
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 054262/0295 →
U.S. ASSIGNMENT OF AND AMENDMENT TO INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC; LIGADO NETWORKS LLC; ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 054298/0001 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
To: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 054297/0444 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 26, 2020
From: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
To: LIGADO NETWORKS LLC; ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 054297/0724 →
ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 22, 2020
From: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
To: CORTLAND CAPITAL MARKET SERVICES LLC
Reel/Frame 054214/0165 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Sep 11, 2020
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 053755/0916 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT (FIRST LIEN) Recorded Jan 22, 2016
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: CREDIT SUISSE AG, CAYMAN ISLANDS BRANCH
Reel/Frame 037573/0939 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT (SECOND LIEN) Recorded Jan 22, 2016
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: JEFFERIES FINANCE LLC
Reel/Frame 037573/0963 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jun 14, 2011
From: LIGHTSQUARED LP; ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; LIGHTSQUARED INC. OF VIRGINIA; LIGHTSQUARED SUBSIDIARY LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 026438/0603 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Oct 12, 2010
From: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
To: WILMINGTON TRUST FSB, AS COLLATERAL TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 025126/0120 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 7, 2010
From: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC; LIGHTSQUARED LP; LIGHTSQUARED FINANCE CO.
Reel/Frame 025105/0605 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 1, 2010
From: MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES LP; MSV FINANCE CO.
To: BANK OF NEW YORK, THE
Reel/Frame 024176/0137 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 21, 2010
From: SKYTERRA, LP
To: ATC TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 023822/0349 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded May 28, 2009
From: CHURAN, GARY G.
To: SKYTERRA, LP
Reel/Frame 022745/0933 →