IP Library Granted Patent US 8,165,846
Granted Patent B2
US 8,165,846 · App. 12/476,436 · Granted Apr 24, 2012

Method and device for fault auto-detection in an on-board system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,165,846
App. No.
12/476,436
Granted
Apr 24, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method for automatic fault detection with data representing a fault in an on-board system, the method including: determining, with a processor, at least two physical variables represented by said data, said at least two physical variables including at least one time-dependent variable representative of a persistence of an event in time, and at least one instantaneous variable; representing, with the processor, said data by points of a space whose coordinates are values of said at least two physical variables; an detecting, with the processor, a fault by employing a frontier defining a subspace of said space in which representation of a datum is associated with the detection of a fault.

Claims (45)

1. A method for automatic fault detection with data representing a fault in an on-board system, the method comprising:

determining, with a processor, at least two physical variables represented by said data, said at least two physical variables including at least

one time-dependent variable representative of a persistence of an event in time, and

at least one instantaneous variable;

representing, with the processor, said data by points of a space whose coordinates are values of said at least two physical variables; and

detecting, with the processor, a fault by employing a frontier defining a subspace of said space in which representation of a datum is associated with the detection of a fault.

2. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

estimating, with the processor, the reactivity of detection of said fault as a function of said frontier and of a position of a representation of a first datum associated with said fault in the said subspace.

3. The method according to claim 2 , wherein the estimating the reactivity includes using a function of a distance between the first datum in the said subspace and an orthogonal projection of said first datum on a hyperplane formed by the frontier.

4. The method according to claim 3 , further comprising:

determining, with the processor, said frontier as a function of values of said at least two physical variables representative of learning data distributed in different classes as a function of whether or not they are associated with the fault.

5. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the determining said frontier includes obtaining the learning data from a simulation of a model of dysfunctioning, each point in the space being associated with an information item of whether or not maintenance is necessary.

6. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the determining said frontier includes obtaining the learning data from bench or flight tests.

7. The method according to claim 4 , wherein the determining said frontier includes determining the frontier on a basis of least squares between points of the different classes.

8. The method according to claim 4 , wherein in the determining said frontier, support vector machines are employed.

9. The method according to claim 2 , further comprising:

determining, with the processor, said frontier as a function of values of said at least two physical variables representative of learning data distributed in different classes as a function of whether or not they are associated with a fault.

10. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the determining said frontier includes obtaining the learning data from a simulation of a model of dysfunctioning, each point in the space being associated with an information item of whether or not maintenance is necessary.

11. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the determining said frontier includes obtaining the learning data from bench or flight tests.

12. The method according to claim 9 , wherein the determining said frontier includes determining the frontier on a basis of least squares between points of the different classes.

13. The method according to claim 1 , further comprising:

determining, with the processor, said frontier as a function of values of said at least two physical variables representative of learning data distributed in different classes as a function of whether or not they are associated with a fault.

14. The method according to claim 13 , wherein the determining said frontier includes obtaining the learning data from a simulation of a model of dysfunctioning, each point in the space being associated with an information item of whether or not maintenance is necessary.

15. The method according to claim 13 , wherein the determining said frontier includes obtaining the learning data from bench or flight tests.

16. The method according to claim 13 , in which in the determining said frontier, the frontier separates two classes of events of

events necessitating maintenance, and

events not necessitating maintenance.

17. The method according to claim 13 , wherein the determining said frontier includes determining the frontier on a basis of least squares between points of the different classes.

18. A device for automatic fault detection with data representing a fault in an on-board system, the device comprising:

a means for determining at least two physical variables represented by said data, said at least two physical variables including at least

one time-dependent variable representative of a persistence of an event in time, and

at least one instantaneous variable;

a means for representing said data by points of a space whose coordinates are values of said at least two physical variables; and

a means for detecting a fault by employing a frontier defining a subspace of said space in which representation of a datum is associated with the detection of a fault.

19. The device according to claim 18 , further comprising:

means for estimating a reactivity of detection of said fault as a function of said frontier and of a position of a representation of a first datum associated with the fault in the said subspace.

20. The device according to claim 19 , in which the means for estimating the reactivity uses a function of a distance between the first datum in said subspace and an orthogonal projection of said first datum on a hyperplane formed by the frontier.

21. A non-transitory computer readable storage medium encoded with instructions, which when executed by a computer causes the computer to execute a method for automatic fault detection with data representing a fault in an on-board system, the method comprising:

determining, with the computer, at least two physical variables represented by said data, said at least two physical variables including at least

one time-dependent variable representative of a persistence of an event in time, and

at least one instantaneous variable;

representing, with the computer, said data by points of a space whose coordinates are values of said at least two physical variables; and

detecting, with the computer, a fault by employing a frontier defining a subspace of said space in which representation of a datum is associated with the detection of a fault.

22. The non-transitory computer readable storage medium of claim 21 , wherein the method further comprises:

estimating, with the computer, a reactivity of detection of said fault as a function of said frontier and of a position of a representation of a first datum associated with the fault in said subspace, wherein the estimating the reactivity uses a function of a distance between the first datum in said subspace and an orthogonal projection of said first datum on a hyperplane formed by the frontier.

Assignments (2)
MERGER Recorded May 18, 2011
From: AIRBUS FRANCE
To: AIRBUS OPERATIONS SAS
Reel/Frame 026298/0269 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 2, 2009
From: CHERIERE, VINCENT; DOS SANTOS GIRIO, JOAO ARAMIS
To: AIRBUS FRANCE
Reel/Frame 022767/0449 →