IP Library Granted Patent US 7,949,537
Granted Patent B2
US 7,949,537 · App. 12/500,718 · Granted May 24, 2011

Method for automated sentence planning in a task classification system

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 7,949,537
App. No.
12/500,718
Granted
May 24, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a method for sentence planning ( 120 ) in a task classification system that interacts with a user. The method may include recognizing symbols in the user's input communication and determining whether the user's input communication can be understood. If the user's communication can be understood, understanding data may be generated ( 220 ). The method may further include generating communicative goals ( 3010 ) based on the recognized symbols and understanding data. The generated communicative goals ( 3010 ) may be related to information needed to be obtained form the user. The method may also include automatically planning one or more sentences ( 3020 ) based on the generated communicative goals and outputting at least one of the sentence plans to the user ( 3080 ).

Claims (40)

1. A computer-implemented method for interacting with a user in a spoken dialog system, the method comprising performing at least one of the following steps via a processor:

in response to information from a user's single input communication in a spoken dialog system, generating a plurality of sentence plans, each sentence plan in the plurality of sentence plans being a realization comprising elementary speech acts each corresponding to a respective communicative goal and combined into at least one complete sentence that accomplishes a plurality of communicative goals and wherein each sentence plan of the plurality of sentence plans is a viable and potentially usable prompt in response to the user's single input communication;

ranking the plurality of generated sentence plans; and

presenting to the user a selected sentence plan from the plurality of sentence plans as a response to the user's single input communication.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising presenting the selected sentence plan such that one dialog turn occurs starting with the user's single input communication and ending with the presented sentence plan.

3. The method of claim 1 , further comprising ranking the plurality of sentence plans.

4. The method of claim 3 , wherein the selected sentence plan is the highest ranked sentence plan of the plurality of the sentence plans.

5. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

realizing the selected sentence plan, wherein the realizing step includes applying a set of linguistic rules to the selected sentence plan.

6. The method of claim 3 , further comprising:

retrieving a training database that includes a set of learned rules, wherein the ranking step is performed using the set of learned rules.

7. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

retrieving a discourse history database that includes interaction information related to a set of interactions between the user and the spoken dialog system, wherein the plurality of sentence plans are generated using the interaction information.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein interactions between the user and the spoken dialog system include a nonverbal communication.

9. The method of claim 8 , wherein the nonverbal communication includes at least one of gestures, body movements, head movements, non-responses, text, keyboard entries, keypad entries, mouse clicks, DTMF codes, pointers, stylus, cable set-top box entries, graphical user interface entries, and touchscreen entries.

10. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether all of the communicative goals have been met; and

routing information obtained from the system's spoken dialog interactions with the user for task completion if the determining step determines that all of the communicative goals have been met.

11. The method of claim 1 , further comprising:

determining whether all of the communicative goals have been met; and

processing any tasks associated with the information obtained from the spoken dialog system's interactions with the user if the determining step determines that all of the communicative goals have been met.

12. A spoken dialog system, the spoken dialog system comprising:

a processor;

a module configured, in response to information from a user's single input communication in a spoken dialog system, to control the processor to generate a plurality of sentence plans each sentence plan in the plurality of sentence plans being a realization comprising elementary speech acts each corresponding to a respective communicative goal and combined into at least one complete sentence that accomplishes a plurality of communicative goals and wherein each sentence plan of the plurality of sentence plans is a viable and potentially usable prompt in response to the user's single input communication;

a module configured to control the processor to rank the plurality of generated sentence plans; and

a module configured to control the processor to present to the user a selected sentence plan from the plurality of sentence plans as a response to the user's single input communication.

13. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a module configured to control the processor to present the selected sentence plan such that one dialog turn occurs starting with the user's single input communication and ending with the presented sentence plan.

14. The system of claim 12 , further comprising a module configured to control the processor to rank the plurality of sentence plans.

15. The system of claim 14 , wherein the selected sentence plan is the highest ranked sentence plan of the plurality of the sentence plans.

16. The system of claim 12 , further comprising:

a module configured to control the processor to realize the selected sentence plan, wherein the realizing includes applying a set of linguistic rules to the selected sentence plan.

17. The system of claim 14 , further comprising:

a module configured to control the processor to retrieve a training database that includes a set of learned rules, wherein the ranking is performed using the set of learned rules.

18. The system of claim 12 , further comprising:

a module configured to control the processor to retrieve a discourse history database that includes interaction information related to a set of interactions between the user and the spoken dialog system, wherein the plurality of sentence plans are generated using the interaction information.

19. The system of claim 12 , wherein interactions between the user and the spoken dialog system include a nonverbal communication.

20. A tangible computer-readable medium storing instructions for controlling a spoken dialog system, the instructions being carried out by a processor, the instructions comprising:

in response to information from a user's single input communication in a spoken dialog system, generating a plurality of sentence plans each sentence plan in the plurality of sentence plans being a realization comprising elementary speech acts each corresponding to a respective communicative goal and combined into at least one complete sentence that accomplishes a plurality of communicative goals and wherein each sentence plan of the plurality of sentence plans is a viable and potentially usable prompt in response to the user's single input communication;

ranking the plurality of generated sentence plans; and

presenting to the user a selected sentence plan from the plurality of sentence plans as a response to the user's single input communication.

Assignments (7)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE REMOVAL OF 7529667, 8095363, 11/169547, US0207236, US0207237, US0207235 AND 11/231452 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 034590 FRAME 0045. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Aug 24, 2018
From: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
To: AT&T ALEX HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 046733/0932 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE ASSIGNEE/ASSIGNOR NAME INCORRECT ASSIGNMENT PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 034590 FRAME: 0045. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Jun 23, 2017
From: AT&T PROPERTIES, LLC
To: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
Reel/Frame 042962/0290 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jan 26, 2017
From: AT&T ALEX HOLDINGS, LLC
To: NUANCE COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Reel/Frame 041495/0903 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Dec 10, 2014
From: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
To: AT&T ALEX HOLDINGS, LLC
Reel/Frame 034590/0045 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 23, 2014
From: AT&T CORP.
To: AT&T PROPERTIES, LLC
Reel/Frame 033800/0746 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 23, 2014
From: AT&T PROPERTIES, LLC
To: AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
Reel/Frame 033800/0947 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Sep 10, 2014
From: WALKER, MARILYN A.; RAMBOW, OWEN CHRISTOPHER; ROGATI, MONICA
To: AT&T CORP.
Reel/Frame 033709/0765 →