IP Library Granted Patent US 8,885,667
Granted Patent B2
US 8,885,667 · App. 12/500,751 · Granted Nov 11, 2014

Destination based methodology for managing network resources

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,885,667
App. No.
12/500,751
Filed
Jul 10, 2009
Granted
Nov 11, 2014
Kind
B2
Art Unit
2461
USPC
370/468
Abstract

A replicator is configured to be coupled to a first packet-based network, and a packet analysis module and a router are coupled to the replicator. The router is configured to be coupled to a second packet-based network. The replicator receives packets from the first packet-based network, passes the packets to the router, and passes a copy of the packets to the packet analysis module. The packet analysis module identifies, in a set of customers of the second packet-based network, a top usage subset. The top usage subset includes those of the customers who are using more bandwidth of the second packet-based network than other ones of the customers. The top usage subset includes at least two of the customers. The packet analysis module identifies, at an entry point of the second packet-based network, routes of packets destined for the top usage subset. The router discards a predetermined percentage of the packets destined for the top usage subset. The predetermined percentage is determined in order to reduce bandwidth utilization of the second packet-based network by a desired amount. The predetermined percentage is identical for all of the customers in the top usage subset.

Claims (88)

1. A method comprising the steps of:

identifying, in a set of customers of a packet communications network, a top usage subset, said top usage subset comprising those of said customers who are using more bandwidth of said packet communications network than other ones of said customers, said top usage subset including at least two of said customers;

identifying, at an entry point of said communications network, routes of packets destined for said top usage subset, said routes comprising border gateway protocol routes, by:

identifying a next hop for those of said packets destined for said top usage subset;

based on said next hops, determining said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset; and

tagging said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset with border gateway protocol community tags as tagged customer-specific routes with identical next hops; and

discarding a predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset, based on said border gateway protocol community tags, said predetermined percentage being determined in order to reduce bandwidth utilization of said packet communications network by a desired amount, said predetermined percentage being identical for all of said customers in said top usage subset.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising refraining from discarding any of those of said packets destined for special customers not eligible for traffic policing.

3. The method of claim 2 , wherein said special customers comprise premium customers who have paid an additional fee for a higher level of service.

4. The method of claim 2 , wherein said special customers comprise commercial customers identified by internet protocol address.

5. The method of claim 2 , wherein said special customers comprise commercial customers identified by reference to a billing database.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said identifying of said top usage subset comprises:

ranking all of said customers of said packet communications network from highest usage to lowest usage, based on usage of said packet communications network for a predetermined time period, to obtain a ranked list having a top and a bottom; and

picking at least two of said customers from said top of said ranked list to obtain said top usage subset, said picking being carried out by adding said customers from said top of said ranked list until a sufficient number of members are present in said top usage subset to obtain said desired amount of reduction in bandwidth utilization.

7. The method of claim 6 , further comprising checking whether a predetermined maximum number of members are in said top usage subset, and, responsive to said checking indicating that said predetermined maximum number of members are in said top usage subset, refraining from adding additional members to said top usage subset even if a sufficient number of members to obtain said desired amount of reduction in bandwidth utilization are not present in said top usage subset.

8. The method of claim 6 , further comprising refraining from said discarding step during off peak times for said packet communications network

9. The method of claim 1 , further comprising preparing a report listing said customers in said top usage subset.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said step of discarding said predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset comprises:

examining, at said entry point of said communications network, all incoming packets;

in a case that a first given one of said incoming packets is not from one of said tagged routes, passing said first given one of said incoming packets; and

in a case that a second given one of said incoming packets is from one of said tagged routes, selectively discarding said second given one of said incoming packets to meet said predetermined percentage.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein:

said identifying of said top usage subset comprises:

ranking all of said customers of said packet communications network from highest usage to lowest usage, based on usage of said packet communications network for a predetermined time period, to obtain a ranked list having a top and a bottom; and

picking at least two of said customers from said top of said ranked list to obtain said top usage subset, said picking being carried out by adding said customers from said top of said ranked list until a sufficient number of members are present in said top usage subset to obtain said desired amount of reduction in bandwidth utilization; and

said step of discarding said predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset comprises:

examining, at said entry point of said communications network, all incoming packets;

in a case that a first given one of said incoming packets is not from one of said tagged routes, passing said first given one of said incoming packets; and

in a case that a second given one of said incoming packets is from one of said tagged routes, selectively discarding said second given one of said incoming packets to meet said predetermined percentage;

further comprising periodically;

re-determining said top usage subset; and

removing from said identified routes any of said identified routes no longer associated with said top usage subset.

12. The method of claim 1 , further comprising providing a system, wherein the system comprises distinct software modules, each of the distinct software modules being embodied on a tangible computer-readable recordable storage medium, and wherein the distinct software modules comprise a packet analysis module and a routing module;

wherein:

said step of identifying, in said set of customers of said packet communications network, said top usage subset, is carried out by said packet analysis module implemented on a deep packet inspection box;

said step of identifying, at said entry point of said communications network, said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset, is carried out by said packet analysis module implemented on said deep packet inspection box; and

said step of discarding said predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset is carried out by said router module implemented on a router.

13. An apparatus comprising:

means for identifying, in a set of customers of a packet communications network, a top usage subset, said top usage subset comprising those of said customers who are using more bandwidth of said packet communications network than other ones of said customers, said top usage subset including at least two of said customers;

means for identifying, at an entry point of said communications network, routes of packets destined for said top usage subset, said routes comprising border gateway protocol routes, by:

identifying a next hop for those of said packets destined for said top usage subset;

based on said next hops, determining said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset; and

tagging said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset with border gateway protocol community tags as tagged customer-specific routes with identical next hops; and

means for discarding a predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset, based on said border gateway protocol community tags, said predetermined percentage being determined in order to reduce bandwidth utilization of said packet communications network by a desired amount, said predetermined percentage being identical for all of said customers in said top usage subset.

14. An article of manufacture comprising a computer program product, said computer program product in turn comprising a non-transitory tangible computer readable recordable storage medium, storing in a non-transitory mariner computer readable program code, the computer program product including:

computer usable program code configured to identify, in a set of customers of a packet communications network, a top usage subset, said top usage subset comprising those of said customers who are using more bandwidth of said packet communications network than other ones of said customers, said top usage subset including at least two of said customers;

computer usable program code configured to identify, at an entry point of said communications network, routes of packets destined for said top usage subset, said routes comprising border gateway protocol routes, by:

identifying a next hop for those of said packets destined for said top usage subset;

based on said next hops, determining said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset; and

tagging said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset with border gateway protocol community tags as tagged customer-specific routes with identical next hops; and

computer usable program code configured to discard a predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset, based on said border gateway protocol community tags, said predetermined percentage being determined in order to reduce bandwidth utilization of said packet communications network by a desired amount, said predetermined percentage being identical for all of said customers in said top usage subset.

15. The article of manufacture of claim 14 , further comprising distinct software modules, each of the distinct software modules being embodied on said tangible computer-readable recordable storage medium, said distinct software modules comprising a packet analysis module and a routing module;

wherein:

said packet analysis module comprises:

said computer usable program code configured to identify, in said set of customers of a packet communications network, said top usage subset; and

said computer usable program code configured to identify, at said entry point of said communications network, said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset; and

said routing module comprises said computer usable program code configured to discard said predetermined percentage of said packets.

16. A system for policing traffic from a first packet-based network to a second packet-based network, said system comprising:

a replicator configured to be coupled to the first packet-based network;

a packet analysis module coupled to said replicator; and

a router coupled to said replicator and said packet analysis module, and configured to be coupled to the second packet-based network;

wherein:

said replicator receives packets from the first packet-based network, passes said packets to said router, and passes a copy of said packets to said packet analysis module;

said packet analysis module identifies, in a set of customers of the second packet-based network, a top usage subset, said top usage subset comprising those of said customers who are using more bandwidth of the second packet-based network than other ones of said customers, said top usage subset including at least two of said customers;

said packet analysis module identifies, at an entry point of the second packet-based network, routes of packets destined for said top usage subset, said routes comprising border gateway protocol routes, by:

identifying a next hop for those of said packets destined for said top usage subset;

based on said next hops, determining said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset; and

tagging said routes of said packets destined for said top usage subset with border gateway protocol community tags as tagged customer-specific routes with identical next hops; and

said router discards a predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset, based on said border gateway protocol community tags, said predetermined percentage being determined in order to reduce bandwidth utilization of the second packet-based network by a desired amount, said predetermined percentage being identical for all of said customers in said top usage subset.

17. The system of claim 16 , wherein said packet analysis module and said router are cooperatively configured to refrain from discarding any of those of said packets destined for special customers not eligible for traffic policing.

18. The system of claim 16 , wherein said packet analysis module identifies said top usage subset by:

ranking all of said customers of the second packet-based network from highest usage to lowest usage, based on usage of the second packet-based network for a predetermined time period, to obtain a ranked list having a top and a bottom; and

picking at least two of said customers from said top of said ranked list to obtain said top usage subset, said picking being carried out by adding said customers from said top of said ranked list until a sufficient number of members are present in said top usage subset to obtain said desired amount of reduction in bandwidth utilization.

19. The system of claim 16 , wherein said packet analysis module prepares a report listing said customers in said top usage subset.

20. The system of claim 16 , wherein said router discards said predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset by:

examining, at said entry point of the second packet-based network, all incoming packets;

in a case that a first given one of said incoming packets is not from one of said identified routes, passing said first given one of said incoming packets; and

in a case that a second given one of said incoming packets is from one of said identified routes, selectively discarding said second given one of said incoming packets to meet said predetermined percentage.

21. The system of claim 16 , wherein:

said packet analysis module identifies said top usage subset by:

ranking all of said customers of the second packet-based network from highest usage to lowest usage, based on usage of the second packet-based network for a predetermined time period, to obtain a ranked list having a top and a bottom; and

picking at least two of said customers from said top of said ranked list to obtain said top usage subset, said picking being carried out by adding said customers from said top of said ranked list until a sufficient number of members are present in said top usage subset to obtain said desired amount of reduction in bandwidth utilization; and

said router discards said predetermined percentage of said packets destined for said top usage subset by:

examining, at said entry point of the second packet-based network, all incoming packets;

in a case that a first given one of said incoming packets is not from one of said tagged routes, passing said first given one of said incoming packets; and

in a case that a second given one of said incoming packets is from one of said tagged routes, selectively discarding said second given one of said incoming packets to meet said predetermined percentage;

said packet analysis module periodically re-determines said top usage subset; and

said packet analysis module periodically removes from said identified routes any of said identified routes no longer associated with said top usage subset.

Assignments (3)
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 25, 2018
From: BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET LLC
To: WELLS FARGO TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 046630/0193 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Jul 17, 2018
From: ADCAST NORTH CAROLINA CABLE ADVERTISING, LLC; ALABANZA LLC; AMERICA'S JOB EXCHANGE LLC; COAXIAL COMMUNICATIONS OF CENTRAL OHIO LLC; DUKENET COMMUNICATIONS HOLDINGS, LLC; DUKENET COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; ICI HOLDINGS, LLC; INSIGHT BLOCKER LLC; INSIGHT CAPITAL LLC; INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY LLC; INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P; INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS MIDWEST, LLC; INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS OF CENTRAL OHIO, LLC; INSIGHT COMMUNICATIONS OF KENTUCKY, L.P.; INSIGHT INTERACTIVE, LLC; INSIGHT KENTUCKY CAPITAL, LLC; INSIGHT KENTUCKY PARTNERS I, L.P.; INSIGHT KENTUCKY PARTNERS II, L.P.; INSIGHT MIDWEST HOLDINGS, LLC; INSIGHT MIDWEST, L.P.; INSIGHT PHONE OF INDIANA, LLC; INSIGHT PHONE OF KENTUCKY, LLC; INSIGHT PHONE OF OHIO, LLC; INTERACTIVE CABLE SERVICES, LLC; INTREPID ACQUISITION LLC; NAVISITE LLC; NEW WISCONSIN PROCUREMENT LLC; OCEANIC TIME WARNER CABLE LLC; PARITY ASSETS, LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE BUSINESS LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (ALABAMA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (ARIZONA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (CALIFORNIA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (COLORADO), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (HAWAII), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (IDAHO), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (ILLINOIS), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (INDIANA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (KANSAS), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (KENTUCKY), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (MAINE), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (MASSACHUSETTS), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (MICHIGAN), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (MISSOURI), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (NEBRASKA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (NEW HAMPSHIRE), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (NEW JERSEY), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (NEW MEXICO) LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (NEW YORK), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (NORTH CAROLINA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (OHIO), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (PENNSYLVANIA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (SOUTH CAROLINA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (TENNESSEE), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (TEXAS), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (VIRGINIA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (WASHINGTON), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (WEST VIRGINIA), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INFORMATION SERVICES (WISCONSIN), LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNATIONAL LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET HOLDINGS III LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET HOLDINGS LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE INTERNET LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE MEDIA LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE MIDWEST LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE NEW YORK CITY LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE NORTHEAST LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE PACIFIC WEST LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE SERVICES LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE SOUTHEAST LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE SPORTS LLC; TIME WARNER CABLE TEXAS LLC; TWC ADMINISTRATION LLC; TWC COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; TWC DIGITAL PHONE LLC; TWC MEDIA BLOCKER LLC; TWC NEWCO LLC; TWC NEWS AND LOCAL PROGRAMMING HOLDCO LLC; TWC NEWS AND LOCAL PROGRAMMING LLC; TWC REGIONAL SPORTS NETWORK I LLC; TWC SECURITY LLC; TWC SEE HOLDCO LLC; TWC WIRELESS LLC; TWC/CHARTER DALLAS CABLE ADVERTISING, LLC; TWCIS HOLDCO LLC; WISCONSIN PROCUREMENT HOLDCO LLC; BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS, LLC; BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS INFORMATION SERVICES (ALABAMA), LLC; BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS INFORMATION SERVICES (CALIFORNIA), LLC; BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS INFORMATION SERVICES (FLORIDA), LLC; BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS INFORMATION SERVICES (INDIANA), LLC; BRIGHT HOUSE NETWORKS INFORMATION SERVICES (MICHIGAN), LLC; BHN SPECTRUM INVESTMENTS, LLC; BHN HOME SECURITY SERVICES, LLC; AMERICAN CABLE ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY, LLC; ATHENS CABLEVISION, LLC; AUSABLE CABLE TV, LLC; BRESNAN BROADBAND HOLDINGS, LLC; BRESNAN BROADBAND OF COLORADO, LLC; BRESNAN BROADBAND OF MONTANA, LLC; BRESNAN BROADBAND OF UTAH, LLC; BRESNAN BROADBAND OF WYOMING, LLC; BRESNAN COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; BRESNAN DIGITAL SERVICES, LLC; BRESNAN MICROWAVE OF MONTANA, LLC; CABLE EQUITIES COLORADO, LLC; CABLE EQUITIES OF COLORADO MANAGEMENT LLC CC 10, LLC; CC FIBERLINK, LLC; CC MICHIGAN, LLC; CC SYSTEMS, LLC; CC V HOLDINGS, LLC; CC VI FIBERLINK, LLC; CC VI OPERATING COMPANY, LLC; CC VII FIBERLINK, LLC; CC VIII FIBERLINK, LLC; CC VIII HOLDINGS, LLC; CC VIII OPERATING, LLC; CC VIII, LLC; CCO FIBERLINK, LLC; CCO HOLDCO TRANSFERS VII, LLC; CCO LP, LLC; CCO NR HOLDINGS, LLC; CCO PURCHASING, LLC; CCO SOCAL I, LLC; CCO SOCAL II, LLC; CCO SOCAL VEHICLES, LLC; CCO TRANSFERS, LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (AL), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (CA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (CO), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (CT), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (GA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (IL), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (IN), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (KY), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (LA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MD), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MI), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MN), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MO), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MS), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (MT), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (NC), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (NE), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (NH), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (NV), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (NY), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (OH), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (OR), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (PA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (SC), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (TN), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (TX), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (UT), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (VA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (VT), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (WA), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (WI), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (WV), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES (WY), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES VIII (MI), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES VIII (MN), LLC; CHARTER ADVANCED SERVICES VIII (WI), LLC; CHARTER ADVERTISING OF SAINT LOUIS, LLC; CHARTER CABLE OPERATING COMPANY, LLC; CHARTER CABLE PARTNERS, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT I, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT II, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS ENTERTAINMENT, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OF CALIFORNIA, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING CAPITAL CORP.; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS OPERATING, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS PROPERTIES LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS V, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VENTURES, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VI, L.L.C.; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS VII, LLC; CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; CHARTER DISTRIBUTION, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - ALABAMA, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - GEORGIA, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - ILLINOIS, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - MARYLAND II, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - MICHIGAN, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - MISSOURI, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - NEBRASKA, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - PENNSYLVANIA, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK - TENNESSEE, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK AR-CCVII, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK CA-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK CC VIII, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK CT-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK LA-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK MA-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK MS-CCVI, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK NC-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK NH-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK NV-CCVII, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK NY-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK OH-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK OR-CCVII, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK SC-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK TX-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK VA-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK VT-CCO, LLC; CHARTER FIBERLINK WA-CCVII, LLC; CHARTER HELICON, LLC; CHARTER HOME SECURITY, LLC; CHARTER LEASING HOLDING COMPANY, LLC; CHARTER LEASING OF WISCONSIN, LLC; CHARTER RMG, LLC; CHARTER STORES FCN, LLC; CHARTER VIDEO ELECTRONICS, LLC; FALCON CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; FALCON CABLE MEDIA, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FALCON CABLE SYSTEMS COMPANY II, L.P.; FALCON CABLEVISION, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FALCON COMMUNITY CABLE, L.P.; FALCON COMMUNITY VENTURES I LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FALCON FIRST CABLE OF THE SOUTHEAST, LLC; FALCON FIRST, LLC; FALCON TELECABLE, A CALIFORNIA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP; FALCON VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS, L.P.; HELICON PARTNERS I, L.P.; HOMETOWN T.V., LLC; HPI ACQUISITION CO. LLC; INTERLINK COMMUNICATIONS PARTNERS, LLC; LONG BEACH, LLC; MARCUS CABLE ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.; MARCUS CABLE OF ALABAMA, L.L.C.; MARCUS CABLE, LLC; MIDWEST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; PEACHTREE CABLE TV, L.P.; PEACHTREE CABLE TV, LLC; PHONE TRANSFERS (AL), LLC; PHONE TRANSFERS (CA), LLC; PHONE TRANSFERS (GA), LLC; PHONE TRANSFERS (NC), LLC; PHONE TRANSFERS (TN), LLC; PHONE TRANSFERS (VA), LLC; PLATTSBURGH CABLEVISION, LLC; RENAISSANCE MEDIA LLC; RIFKIN ACQUISITION PARTNERS, LLC; ROBIN MEDIA GROUP, LLC; SCOTTSBORO TV CABLE, LLC TENNESSEE, LLC; THE HELICON GROUP, L.P.; VISTA BROADBAND COMMUNICATIONS, LLC; VOIP TRANSFERS (AL), LLC; VOIP TRANSFERS (CA) LLC; VOIP TRANSFERS (GA), LLC; VOIP TRANSFERS (NC), LLC; VOIP TRANSFERS (TN), LLC; VOIP TRANSFERS (VA), LLC
To: THE BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON TRUST COMPANY, N.A.
Reel/Frame 046567/0090 →
CHANGE OF ADDRESS Recorded Nov 15, 2017
From: TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC
To: TIME WARNER CABLE ENTERPRISES LLC
Reel/Frame 044456/0167 →