IP Library Granted Patent US 8,126,426
Granted Patent B2
US 8,126,426 · App. 12/509,622 · Granted Feb 28, 2012

System and method for assessing mobile application value

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,126,426
App. No.
12/509,622
Granted
Feb 28, 2012
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method and system for assessing a value of a first application with respect to a use of a mobile communication device in communication with a second communication device are presented. The method entails assigning a set of proximity values that relate the use of the application to the communication between the mobile communication device and the second communication device, and determining an impact and a value based on the proximity values. The proximity values may include a relationship proximity value, a time proximity value, a geographical proximity value, an action proximity value, and one or more user-defined proximity values. The determined value may be expressed as a monetary value.

Claims (28)

1. A system for assessing a value of a first application with respect to a use of a first mobile communication device, the system comprising at least one computer server in communication with the first mobile communication device via a network and at least a second communication device in communication with the first mobile communication device via the network, wherein the server is configured to:

detect a use of the first mobile communication device with respect to the second communication device, wherein the detected use includes a use of the first application and a communication with the second communication device;

assign at least a first proximity value to the detected use of the first mobile communication device with respect to the second communication device and the use of the first application;

use the assigned at least first proximity value to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the first mobile communication device; and

use the determined impact to assess a value of the detected use of the first application with respect to the detected use of the first mobile communication device.

2. The system of claim 1 , wherein the use of the first mobile communication device is a revenue-generating use, and the server is further configured to determine an amount of revenue derived from the detected use of the first mobile communication device, and to use the determined impact and the determined amount of revenue to assess the value of the detected use of the first application with respect to the detected use of the first mobile communication device.

3. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least first assigned proximity value is selected from the group consisting of a relationship proximity value, a time proximity value, a geographical proximity value, an application proximity value, an action proximity value, and a user-defined proximity value.

4. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least first assigned proximity value includes at least a relationship proximity value and a time proximity value, and wherein the assigned relationship proximity value is based on a first predetermined set of criteria, and wherein the assigned time proximity value is based on a number of nanoseconds, microseconds, milliseconds, seconds, or minutes that elapse between the detected use of the first application and a detection of a response by the second communication device, and wherein the server is further configured to use the assigned relationship and time proximity values to determine an impact by computing a composite proximity distance value.

5. The system of claim 4 , wherein the composite proximity distance value is selected from the group consisting of a Euclidean distance, a mean distance, a Mahalanobis distance, a Manhattan distance, a Chebyshev distance, and a Minkowski distance.

6. The system of claim 4 , wherein the composite proximity distance value is computed by taking a square root of a sum of squares of the respective relationship and time proximity values.

7. The system of claim 4 , wherein the server is further configured to assign a geographical proximity value to the detected use of the first mobile communication device with respect to the detected use of the first application, and to use the assigned relationship, time, and geographical proximity values to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the mobile communication device, wherein the assigned geographical proximity value is based on a geographical distance between a location associated with the detected use of the first application and a location associated with the second communication device, and wherein the server is further configured to use the assigned relationship, time, and geographical proximity values to determine an impact by taking a square root of a sum of squares of the respective relationship, time, and geographical proximity values.

8. The system of claim 4 , wherein the server is further configured to assign at least a first user-defined proximity value to the detected use of the mobile communication device with respect to the detected use of the first application, and to use the assigned relationship, time, and user-defined proximity values to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the mobile communication device, wherein the at least first assigned user-defined proximity value is based on a second predetermined set of criteria, and wherein the server is further configured to use the assigned relationship, time, and user-defined proximity values to determine an impact by taking a square root of a sum of squares of the respective relationship, time, and user-defined proximity values.

9. The system of claim 1 , wherein the first application is selected from the group consisting of: an instant messaging application; a text messaging application; a social networking application; an electronic mail application; a multimedia messaging application; a search application; a location application; an advertising application; a file sharing application; a portal/intranet application; a CRM application; an ERP application; an address book application; a database application; a process application; a procurement application; a blog application; an internal network collaboration application; a video download application; an audio download application; a video teleconference application; an audio teleconference application; a video streaming application; an audio streaming application; a picture album application; an Internet web site application; a web browsing application; a peer-to-peer file sharing or media streaming application; a voice-over Internet protocol application; a payment application; a financial or investment application; an insurance application; and a marketing application.

10. The system of claim 1 , wherein the use of a mobile communication device is selected from the group consisting of conducting a voice telephone call, sending a text message, sending an electronic mail message, using a web browser, uploading data, downloading data, sending information over a mobile data channel, and receiving information over a mobile data channel.

11. A method for assessing a value of a first application with respect to a use of a first mobile communication device, the first mobile communication device being in communication with a second communication device via a network, and the method comprising the steps of:

detecting a use of the first mobile communication device with respect to the second communication device, wherein the detected use includes a use of the first application and a communication with the second communication device;

assigning at least a first proximity value to the detected use of the first mobile communication device with respect to the second communication device and the use of the first application;

using the assigned at least first proximity value to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the first mobile communication device; and

using the determined impact to assess a value of the detected use of the first application with respect to the detected use of the first mobile communication device.

12. The method of claim 11 , wherein the use of the first mobile communication device is a revenue-generating use, and the step of using the determined impact to assess a value further comprises the steps of determining an amount of revenue derived from the detected use of the first mobile communication device, and using the determined impact and the determined amount of revenue to assess the value of the detected use of the first application with respect to the detected use of the first mobile communication device.

13. The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least first assigned proximity value is selected from the group consisting of a relationship proximity value, a time proximity value, a geographical proximity value, an application proximity value, an action proximity value, and a user-defined proximity value.

14. The method of claim 11 , wherein the at least first assigned proximity value includes at least a relationship proximity value and a time proximity value, and wherein the assigned relationship proximity value is based on a first predetermined set of criteria, and wherein the assigned time proximity value is based on a number of nanoseconds, microseconds, milliseconds, seconds, or minutes that elapse between the detected use of the first application and a detection of a response by the second communication device, and the step of using the assigned relationship and time proximity values to determine an impact further comprises using the assigned relationship and time proximity values to determine an impact by computing a composite proximity distance value.

15. The method of claim 14 , wherein the composite proximity distance value is selected from the group consisting of a Euclidean distance, a mean distance, a Mahalanobis distance, a Manhattan distance, a Chebyshev distance, and a Minkowski distance.

16. The method of claim 14 , wherein the composite proximity distance value is computed by taking a square root of a sum of squares of the respective relationship and time proximity values.

17. The method of claim 14 , further comprising the step of assigning a geographical proximity value to the detected use of the first mobile communication device with respect to the detected use of the first application, wherein the step of using the assigned relationship and time proximity values to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the first mobile communication device further comprises using the assigned relationship, time, and geographical proximity values to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the first mobile communication device, wherein the assigned geographical proximity value is based on a geographical distance between a location associated with the detected use of the first application and a location associated with the second communication device, and the step of using the assigned relationship, time, and geographical proximity values to determine an impact further comprises taking a square root of a sum of squares of the respective relationship, time, and geographical proximity values.

18. The method of claim 14 , further comprising the step of assigning at least a first user-defined proximity value to the detected use of the mobile communication device with respect to the detected use of the first application, wherein the step of using the assigned relationship and time proximity values to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the mobile communication device further comprises using the assigned relationship, time, and user-defined proximity values to determine an impact of the detected use of the first application upon the detected use of the mobile communication device, wherein the at least first assigned user-defined proximity value is based on a second predetermined set of criteria, and the step of using the assigned relationship, time, and user-defined proximity values to determine an impact further comprises taking a square root of a sum of squares of the respective relationship, time, and user-defined proximity values.

19. The method of claim 11 , wherein the first application is selected from the group consisting of: an instant messaging application; a text messaging application; a social networking application; an electronic mail application; a multimedia messaging application; a search application; a location application; an advertising application; a file sharing application; a portal/intranet application; a CRM application; an ERP application; an address book application; a database application; a process application; a procurement application; a blog application; an internal network collaboration application; a video download application; an audio download application; a video teleconference application; an audio teleconference application; a video streaming application; an audio streaming application; a picture album application; an Internet web site application; a web browsing application; a peer-to-peer file sharing or media streaming application; a voice-over Internet protocol application; a payment application; a financial or investment application; an insurance application; and a marketing application.

20. The method of claim 11 , wherein the use of a mobile communication device is selected from the group consisting of conducting a voice telephone call, sending a text message, sending an electronic mail message, using a web browser, uploading data, downloading data, sending information over a mobile data channel, and receiving information over a mobile data channel.

Assignments (13)
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE APPLICATION NO. 16/990,698 PREVIOUSLY RECORDED ON REEL 058294 FRAME 0010. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Apr 21, 2022
From: TRU OPTIK DATA CORP.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR DATA SERVICES, INC.; TRUSTID, INC.; NEUSTAR, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS, LLC; SONTIQ, INC.
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
Reel/Frame 059846/0157 →
TERMINATION AND RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS RECORDED AT REEL 058294, FRAME 0161 Recorded Dec 27, 2021
From: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.
To: EBUREAU, LLC; IOVATION, INC.; SIGNAL DIGITAL, INC.; TRANS UNION LLC; TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC.; TRANSUNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANSUNION TELEDATA LLC; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, LLC; TRU OPTIK DATA CORP.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; TRUSTID, INC.; NEUSTAR, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS, LLC; SONTIQ, INC.
Reel/Frame 058593/0852 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 3, 2021
From: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
To: NEUSTAR, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS LLC; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, INC.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 058300/0739 →
FIRST LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT RELEASE Recorded Dec 3, 2021
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
To: NEUSTAR, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS LLC; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, INC.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.
Reel/Frame 058300/0762 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN UNITED STATES PATENTS Recorded Dec 1, 2021
From: EBUREAU, LLC; IOVATION, INC.; SIGNAL DIGITAL, INC.; TRANS UNION LLC; TRANSUNION HEALTHCARE, INC.; TRANSUNION INTERACTIVE, INC.; TRANSUNION RENTAL SCREENING SOLUTIONS, INC.; TRANSUNION TELEDATA LLC; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, LLC; TRU OPTIK DATA CORP.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; TRUSTID, INC.; NEUSTAR, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS, LLC; SONTIQ, INC.
To: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A
Reel/Frame 058294/0161 →
GRANT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT RIGHTS Recorded Dec 1, 2021
From: TRU OPTIK DATA CORP.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR DATA SERVICES, INC.; TRUSTID, INC.; NEUSTAR, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS, LLC; SONTIQ, INC.
To: DEUTSCHE BANK AG NEW YORK BRANCH
Reel/Frame 058294/0010 →
SECOND LIEN PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Aug 22, 2017
From: MARKETSHARE PARTNERS LLC; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, INC.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; NEUSTAR, INC.
To: UBS AG, STAMFORD BRANCH
Reel/Frame 043633/0527 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 22, 2017
From: MARKETSHARE PARTNERS LLC; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, INC.; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; NEUSTAR, INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Reel/Frame 043633/0440 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Aug 21, 2017
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NEUSTAR, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; ULTRADNS CORPORATION; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR DATA SERVICES, INC.; AGGREGATE KNOWLEDGE, INC.; MARKETSHARE ACQUISITION CORPORATION; MARKETSHARE HOLDINGS, INC.; MARKETSHARE PARTNERS, LLC
Reel/Frame 043618/0826 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Feb 13, 2013
From: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
To: NEUSTAR, INC.; TARGUS INFORMATION CORPORATION; QUOVA, INC.; ULTRADNS CORPORATION; AMACAI INFORMATION CORPORATION; MUREX LICENSING CORPORATION
Reel/Frame 029809/0177 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Feb 13, 2013
From: NEUSTAR, INC.; NEUSTAR IP INTELLIGENCE, INC.; ULTRADNS CORPORATION; NEUSTAR INFORMATION SERVICES, INC.; NEUSTAR DATA SERVICES, INC.
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 029809/0260 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Jan 10, 2012
From: NEUSTAR, INC.; TARGUS INFORMATION CORPORATION; QUOVA, INC; ULTRADNS CORPORATION; AMACAI INFORMATION CORPORATION; MUREX LICENSING CORPORATION
To: MORGAN STANLEY SENIOR FUNDING, INC.
Reel/Frame 027512/0119 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 11, 2009
From: FRIDMAN, SHARON; DOR, IRAD
To: NEUSTAR, INC.
Reel/Frame 023502/0723 →