IP Library Granted Patent US 8,005,604
Granted Patent B2
US 8,005,604 · App. 12/518,066 · Granted Aug 23, 2011

Method and system for adjusting the operation parameters of an injection thermal engine while reducing effluents

Assignee: Peugeot Citroen Automobiles SA
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,005,604
App. No.
12/518,066
Granted
Aug 23, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

The invention relates to a method for adjusting the operation parameters of an injection internal combustion engine ( 10 ), that comprises the following steps: setting a stability setpoint Ss, calculating an engine stability index Is, calculating the stability deviation Es equal to the difference between the stability setpoint Ss and the stability index Is, processing the stability deviation Es using a regulator ( 18 ) that provides an setpoint to be applied to one of the engine operation parameters, said parameter being selected by a calculator ( 20 ) or supervisor that controls the adjustment so that the corrective action applied optimizes the effluent level and/or the thermal energy available at the exhaust while respecting the stability setpoint Ss.

Claims (22)

1. Method for regulating the operating parameters of a fuel-injection internal combustion engine, comprising the following steps:

establishing a stability setpoint Ss,

calculating an engine stability index Is,

calculating the stability deviation Es, equal to the difference between the stability setpoint Ss and the stability index Is,

processing the stability deviation Es using a regulator that provides a setpoint to be applied for one of the engine operating parameters, this parameter being selected by a calculator ( 20 ) or supervisor that controls parameter regulation in such a way that the corrective action taken optimizes pollutant emissions levels and/or the available thermal energy in the exhaust stream, while also maintaining the stability setpoint Ss,

the method being such that, with each parameter varying within an interval defined by two threshold values, when one parameter reaches a threshold value as the result of a first corrective action, the calculator that controls parameter regulation then selects another parameter for which a setpoint will be similarly determined and applied.

2. Method according to claim 1 , wherein the calculator that controls parameter regulation selects all of the engine operating parameters on which a corrective action can be taken, one after another, with the parameter selection order being determined by the influence of each of these parameters on pollutant emissions and/or the available thermal energy in the exhaust stream.

3. Method according to claim 2 , wherein the regulator comprises a PID-type regulator.

4. Method according to claim 3 , wherein, for each parameter addressed, the calculator can implement an emergency strategy if the stability deviation is too great.

5. Method according to claim 4 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

6. Method according to claim 3 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

7. Method according to claim 2 , wherein, for each parameter addressed, the calculator can implement an emergency strategy if the stability deviation is too great.

8. Method according to claim 7 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

9. Method according to claim 2 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

10. Method according to claim 1 , wherein the regulator comprises a PID-type regulator.

11. Method according to claim 10 , wherein, for each parameter addressed, the calculator can implement an emergency strategy if the stability deviation is too great.

12. Method according to claim 11 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

13. Method according to claim 10 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

14. Method according to claim 1 , wherein, for each parameter addressed, the calculator can implement an emergency strategy if the stability deviation is too great.

15. Method according to claim 14 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

16. Method according to claim 1 , wherein the parameter addressed is selected from the group comprising: engine richness, spark advance, valve overlap.

17. Control system for a fuel-injection internal combustion engine, implementing the method according to claim 1 .

Assignments (1)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Jun 5, 2009
From: GOURVES, FREDERIC
To: PEUGEOT CITROEN AUTOMOBILES SA
Reel/Frame 022789/0194 →
Priority Claims (1)
FR 06 55396 · Dec 8, 2006 · national
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20100036586A1 · Feb 11, 2010