IP Library Granted Patent US 8,086,558
Granted Patent B2
US 8,086,558 · App. 12/539,166 · Granted Dec 27, 2011

Computer-implemented system for human resources management

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,086,558
App. No.
12/539,166
Granted
Dec 27, 2011
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system and method for testing and/or evaluating employees or potential employees is disclosed. A computer arranges a plurality of applicants in a stack ranked table. The table may rank or re-rank applicants against each other, from best to worst, after successive screening, selecting, and/or interviewing stages for a particular job. Performance evaluations of hired workers may be fed back to the computer for adjusting the system and method. Competencies shown to be predictive of successful performance of a given type of job are tested for at various stages in an online testing system.

Claims (51)

1. A computer-implemented method of screening and selecting persons for a position for an employer comprising:

providing an online screening solution that automatically determines if a given candidate is suitable for the position in response to a plurality of questions asked as part of the online screening solution;

providing an online selection solution having questions related to a plurality of competencies related to the position, the online selection solution being distinct from the online screening solution and including questions other than questions relating to background, knowledge and skills of the given candidate which have answers that are validated and correlated as being predictive of success for the position;

using a computer processing system to statistically correlate job performance ratings of a plurality of workers who were hired with previous answers given by the plurality of workers to the questions in the online selection solution before the plurality of workers was hired to validate and correlate the questions as being predictive of success for the position;

for candidates who are determined by the online screening solution to be suitable for the position, automatically creating a rank order of applicants from the candidates based at least in part on responses of the candidate as compared to the validated and correlated answers to questions in the online selection solution for the plurality of competencies; and

making the rank order of such applicants available online to the employer as a dynamic filter for aiding in the selection of applicants for the position.

2. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

automatically rank ordering those candidates from the online screening solution; and

making the rank ordering of those candidates from the online screening solution available online to the employer.

3. The computer-implemented method of claim 2 , further comprising:

permitting the employer to select which of those candidates from the online screening solution are permitted to use the online selection solution.

4. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the step of providing the online screening solution is provided without proctoring; and

the step of providing the online selection solution is provided with proctoring.

5. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the step of providing the online screening solution is accomplished by making the online screening solution accessible to candidates via at least one of an Internet website and an interactive telephonic interface.

6. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein:

the step of providing the online screening solution includes presenting at least one knockout question to an applicant whereby the applicant is determined to be unsuitable for the position based on a response to a single question that forms the knockout question.

7. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , wherein the step of providing the online selection solution comprises:

utilizing a plurality of separably scorable sections of questions.

8. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the step of providing the online selection solution further comprises:

scoring each scorable section upon completion by the applicant; and

presenting questions for a next scorable section only if the applicant has successfully passed a previous scorable section.

9. The computer-implemented method of claim 8 , further comprising:

providing a customized message to the candidate based on whether the applicant passed the previous scorable section.

10. The computer-implemented method of claim 7 , wherein the step of providing the online selection solution comprises:

providing a first set of questions correlated to customer service;

providing a second set of questions correlated to working with information; and

providing a third set of questions correlated to sales potential.

11. The computer-implemented method of claim 10 , wherein the step of providing the online selection solution further comprises:

as part of the rank order that is automatically created, generating scores for each of the first, second and third sets of questions to predict performance, potential and tenure of the applicants.

12. The computer-implemented method of claim 1 , further comprising:

providing a customized message to the candidate based on the online screening solution determining whether the candidate is suitable for the position or not.

13. A computer-implemented method of screening candidates for a position for an employer comprising:

providing an online solution having a plurality of scorable sections of questions each related to a competency other than background, knowledge and skills of the candidates, wherein the questions have answers that are validated and correlated as being predictive of success for the position in terms of at least one of performance, potential and tenure of the candidates;

using a computer processing system to statistically correlate job performance ratings of a plurality of workers who were hired with previous answers given by the plurality of workers to the questions before the plurality of workers was hired;

automatically creating a rank order of candidates for the position based at least in part on responses of the candidate as compared to the validated and correlated answers to questions in the online solution, wherein the rank order includes scores for each of the plurality of scorable sections; and

making the rank order of such candidates available online to the employer as a dynamic filter for aiding in the screening of candidates for the position.

14. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein:

the step of providing the online solution is accomplished by making the online solution accessible to candidates via at least one of an Internet website and an interactive telephonic interface.

15. The computer-implemented method of claim 13 , wherein:

the step of providing the online solution further includes presenting at least one knockout question to a candidate whereby the candidate is determined to be unsuitable for the position based on a response to a single question that forms the knockout question.

16. A computer-implemented method of screening candidates for a position for an employer comprising:

providing an online solution having a plurality of scorable sections of questions each related to a competency other than background, knowledge and skills of the candidates, wherein the questions have answers that are validated and correlated as being predictive of success for the position in terms of at least one of performance, potential and tenure of the candidates;

using a computer processing system to statistically correlate job performance ratings of a plurality of workers who were hired with previous answers given by the plurality of workers to the questions before the plurality of workers was hired;

automatically creating a rank order of candidates for the position based at least in part on responses of the candidate as compared to the validated and correlated answers to questions in the online solution and including performing the steps of:

scoring each scorable section upon completion by the candidate; and

presenting questions for a next scorable section only if the candidate has successfully passed a previous scorable section; and

making the rank order of such candidates available online to the employer as a dynamic filter for aiding in the screening of candidates for the position.

17. The computer-implemented method of claim 16 , further comprising:

providing a customized message to the candidate based on whether the candidate passed the previous scorable section.

Assignments (10)
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Apr 21, 2017
From: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: SHL US, INC.
Reel/Frame 042091/0688 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded May 3, 2013
From: SHL US INC.
To: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 030342/0816 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 24, 2013
From: SHL USA, INC.
To: PREVISOR INC.
Reel/Frame 030274/0229 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 24, 2013
From: PREVISOR INC.
To: SHL US INC.
Reel/Frame 030274/0256 →
MERGER Recorded Aug 16, 2012
From: PREVISOR INC.
To: SHL USA, INC.
Reel/Frame 028798/0942 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN CERTAIN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Recorded Aug 14, 2012
From: CIT CAPITAL FINANCE (UK) LIMITED, AS SECURITY TRUSTEE
To: PREVISOR INC.
Reel/Frame 028781/0262 →
SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Apr 26, 2011
From: PREVISOR INC.
To: CIT CAPITAL FINANCE (UK) LIMITED, AS SECURITY TRUSTEE
Reel/Frame 026182/0968 →
MERGER Recorded Apr 29, 2010
From: PREVISOR MINNESOTA, INC.
To: PREVISOR INC.
Reel/Frame 024309/0763 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Apr 13, 2010
From: EPREDIX, INC.
To: PREVISOR MINNESOTA, INC.
Reel/Frame 024224/0731 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Apr 2, 2010
From: DEWAR, KATRINA L.
To: EPREDIX, INC.
Reel/Frame 024179/0654 →