IP Library Granted Patent US 8,475,391
Granted Patent B2
US 8,475,391 · App. 12/560,916 · Granted Jul 2, 2013

Method and system for quantitative assessment of spatial distractor tasks

Inventor: Charles J. Duffy (Pittsford, NY)
Assignee: Cerebral Assessment Systems
View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,475,391
App. No.
12/560,916
Granted
Jul 2, 2013
Kind
B2
Abstract

A method is presented to address quantitative assessment of spatial distractor tasks in a subject, where the method comprises the steps of: (1) presenting at least one scene to a subject on a display, said scene comprising a plurality of elements and a background; (2) modulating the saliency of a predetermined section of the scene; (3) receiving feedback from the subject; (4) superimposing an additional cue onto the scene; (5) generating a shift in attention of the subject; (6) receiving refined feedback from the subject; (7) quantitatively refining the refined feedback; (8) adjusting the motion associated with the scene relative to accuracy of the refined feedback; and (9) calculating a critical threshold parameter for the subject; and (10) recording the critical threshold parameter onto a tangible computer readable medium. An apparatus for quantitative assessment of spatial distractor tasks of a subject comprising a display device, an input device, a control device, and a tangible computer readable medium. In its simplest sense, quantitative assessment profile of spatial distractor tasks by psychophysical responses is generated on a tangible computer readable medium.

Claims (67)

1. A method to evaluate functional impairment in a brain of a subject, said method comprising the steps of:

performing a spatial distractor tasks test, said spatial distractor tasks test assessing the combination of visual motion and visual form, said spatial distractor task test comprising the following steps executed on a processor:

presenting at least one scene to said subject on a display, said scene comprising a plurality of elements and a background;

modulating the saliency of a predetermined section of said scene;

receiving feedback from said subject, said feedback associated with input device;

superimposing at least one additional cue onto said scene, said additional cue associated with at least one distractor;

generating a shift in attention of said subject from said predetermined section to said distractor;

receiving refined feedback from said subject via at least one input device;

quantitatively refining said refined feedback relative to said scene;

adjusting the motion associated with said scene relative to accuracy of said quantitatively refined feedback, said adjusted motion associated with a predetermined target;

calculating a critical threshold parameter for said subject;

recording said critical threshold parameter onto a tangible computer readable medium; and

using said critical threshold parameter in assessing evaluating or determining at least one functional impairment in a brain of said subject.

2. The method of claim 1 , further comprising at least one of the additional steps of:

monitoring at least one response error from said subject; and

measuring said response error relative to a predetermined threshold.

3. The method of claim 1 , wherein said step of superimposing is performed at a different location than said step of modulating.

4. The method of claim 1 , wherein said step of superimposing is performed intermittently.

5. The method of claim 1 , wherein said modulated saliency is associated with high saliency.

6. The method of claim 1 , wherein said superimposed cue further comprises a geometric characteristic.

7. The method of claim 6 , wherein said geometric characteristic further comprises at least one of the following:

shape;

size;

orientation;

aspect ratio; and

line thickness.

8. The method of claim 1 , wherein said adjusted motion is associated with said modulated predetermined section.

9. The method of claim 1 , wherein said movement is characterized by at least one of the following:

planar motion;

circular motion;

translational motion;

spiral motion; and

radial motion.

10. The method of claim 1 , wherein said quantitative refinement is associated with saliency.

11. The method of claim 1 , wherein said critical threshold parameter is implemented in a different functional impairment assessment test.

12. A non-transitory computer readable medium, said medium containing instructions executable by a processer to evaluate functional impairment in a brain of a subject, the steps comprising:

performing a spatial distractor tasks test, said spatial distractor tasks test assessing the combination of visual motion and visual form, said spatial distractor task test comprising the following steps:

presenting at least one scene to said subject on a display, said scene comprising a plurality of elements and a background;

modulating the saliency of a predetermined section of said scene;

receiving feedback from said subject, said feedback associated with input device;

superimposing at least one additional cue onto said scene, said additional cue associated with at least one distractor;

generating a shift in attention of said subject from said predetermined section to said distractor;

receiving refined feedback from said subject via at least one input device;

quantitatively refining said refined feedback relative to said scene;

adjusting the motion associated with said scene relative to accuracy of said quantitatively refined feedback, said adjusted motion associated with a predetermined target;

calculating a critical threshold parameter for said subject; and

outputting said critical threshold parameter, said critical threshold parameter used in assessing, evaluating, or determining at least one functional impairment in a brain of said subject.

13. The medium of claim 12 , further comprising at least one of the additional steps of:

monitoring at least one response error from said subject; and

measuring said response error relative to a predetermined threshold.

14. The medium of claim 12 , wherein said step of superimposing is performed at a different location than said step of modulating.

15. The medium of claim 12 , wherein said step of superimposing is performed intermittently.

16. The medium of claim 12 , wherein said modulated saliency is associated with high saliency.

17. The medium of claim 12 , wherein said superimposed cue further comprises a geometric characteristic.

18. The medium of claim 17 , wherein said geometric characteristic further comprises at least one of the following:

shape;

size;

orientation;

aspect ratio; and

line thickness.

19. The medium of claim 12 , wherein said adjusted motion is associated with said modulated predetermined section.

20. The medium of claim 12 , wherein said movement is characterized by at least one of the following:

planar motion;

circular motion;

translational motion;

spiral motion; and

radial motion.

Assignments (2)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 5, 2018
From: CEREBRAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
To: COGNIVUE, INC.
Reel/Frame 045107/0411 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 21, 2013
From: DUFFY, CHARLES JOSEPH
To: CEREBRAL ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS, INC.
Reel/Frame 031441/0639 →
Continuity (1)
Related Publication 20110066071A1 · Mar 17, 2011