IP Library Granted Patent US 8,683,547
Granted Patent B2
US 8,683,547 · App. 12/589,832 · Granted Mar 25, 2014

System and method for implementing adaptive security zones

View Patent ↗
Loading inventors, assignments & file history…
Monitor This Case
Get email alerts when status or documents change.
Order Certified Copies
Most orders are placed with the USPTO same day — all within 24 business hours.
Order via The Patent Place →
Pre-filled with this patent's details
Quick Facts
Patent No.
US 8,683,547
App. No.
12/589,832
Granted
Mar 25, 2014
Kind
B2
Abstract

A system for managing adaptive security zones in complex business operations, comprising a rules engine adapted to receive events from a plurality of event sources and a security manager coupled to the rules engine via a data network, wherein upon receiving an event, the rules engine determines what rules, if any, are triggered by the event and, upon triggering a rule, the rules engine determines if the rule pertains to security and, if so, sends a notification message to the security manager informing it of the triggered event, and wherein the security manager, on receiving a notification message from the rules engine, automatically establishes a new security zone based at least in part on the contents of the notification message, is disclosed.

Claims (34)

1. A security server for managing adaptive security zones in complex business operations, comprising:

a server computer including a computer memory, the computer memory being configured to include a security manager module executable on the server computer, the security manager module being coupled to a rules engine, via a data network, adapted to receive events from a plurality of sources, and the security manager module being configured to:

(a) receive a notification from the rules engine regarding an event triggering a security rule;

(b) automatically establish a new security zone based at least in part on the contents of the notification, said new security zone extending to at least one remote independent agent of handling calls from customers seeking products or services from a contact center of an enterprise, wherein the at least one remote independent agent works at an agent station that is outside of boundaries of the enterprise;

(c) determine one or more components and the at least one remote independent agent affected by the new security zone; and

(d) notify each affected component and the at least one remote independent agent of one or more security rules to be enforced by on the component to facilitate the establishment of the new security zone.

2. The system of claim 1 , in which at least one of the event sources is a communications system or device.

3. The system of claim 1 , in which at least one of the event sources is a call manager.

4. The system of claim 1 , in which the security zone precludes the use of at least one software tool or program that is otherwise available to the remote independent agent.

5. The system of claim 1 , in which the security zone requires at least an additional authentication step before the remote independent agent is allowed to take a specific action.

6. The system of claim 1 , in which the security zone causes sensitive information to be automatically made inaccessible within a call recording.

7. A system for managing adaptive security zones in customer service operations involving remote independent customer service agents, comprising:

a call manager server adapted at least to receive and control telephony sessions;

a rules engine adapted to receive events from at least the call manager server; and

a security manager coupled to the rules engine via a data network, the security manager being configured to:

(a) receive a notification from the rules engine regarding an event triggering a security rule;

(b) automatically establish a new security zone based at least in part on the contents of the notification, said new security zone extending to at least one remote independent agent of a contact center handling calls from customers seeking products or services from a contact center of an enterprise, wherein the at least one remote independent agent works at an agent station that is outside of boundaries of the enterprise;

(e) determine one or more components and the at least one remote independent agent affected by the new security zone; and

(d) notify each affected component and the at least one remote independent agent of one or more security rules to be enforced by the component to facilitate the establishment of the new security zone.

8. A computer implemented method for adaptively managing security zones in complex business operations, comprising the steps of:

(a) receiving an event pertaining to a business operation;

(b) determining if any rules are triggered by the received event;

(c) determining if any triggered rules pertain to security;

(d) establishing a new security zone based at least in part on the identity and contents of a triggered security-related rule, said new security zone extending to at least one remote independent agent of a contact center handling calls from customers seeking products or services from a contact center of an enterprise, wherein the at least one remote independent agent works at an agent station that is outside of boundaries of the enterprise;

(e) determining one or more components and the at least one remote independent agent affected by the new security zone; and

(f) notifying each affected component and the at least one remote independent agent of one or more security rules to be enforced by the component to facilitate the establishment of the new security zone.

9. The method of claim 8 , in which the complex business operation is a customer service operation.

10. The method of claim 8 , in which the event is generated by a communications server or device.

11. The method of claim 9 , in which the event is generated by a call manager.

12. The method of claim 8 , in which the security zone precludes the use of at least one software tool or program that is otherwise available to the remote independent agent.

13. The method of claim 8 , in which the security zone requires at least an additional authentication step before the remote independent agent is allowed to take a specific action.

14. The method of claim 8 , in which the security zone causes sensitive information to be automatically made inaccessible within a call recording.

15. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one remote independent agent is an agent working from home.

16. The system of claim 1 , wherein the at least one remote independent agent is an employee of an outsourcer that provides contact center services on behalf of the enterprise.

Assignments (11)
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Mar 14, 2025
From: SL MIDCO 2, LLC; SL MIDCO 1, LLC; LO PLATFORM MIDCO, INC.; SERENOVA, LLC; LIFESIZE, INC.; TELESTRAT LLC; LIGHT BLUE OPTICS INC.; SERENOVA WFM, INC.
To: ENGHOUSE INTERACTIVE INC.
Reel/Frame 070932/0415 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 16, 2020
From: SERENOVA, LLC
To: WESTRIVER INNOVATION LENDING FUND VIII, L.P.
Reel/Frame 052126/0423 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENT COLLATERAL AT REEL/FRAME NO. 43855/0947 Recorded Mar 3, 2020
From: GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
To: SERENOVA, LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS LIVEOPS CLOUD PLATFORM, LLC; LO PLATFORM MIDCO, INC.; TELSTRAT LLC
Reel/Frame 052079/0941 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Mar 2, 2020
From: SERENOVA, LLC; LIFESIZE, INC.; LO PLATFORM MIDCO, INC.
To: SILICON VALLEY BANK, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT AND COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 052066/0126 →
RELEASE OF SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2017
From: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS AGENT
To: LO PLATFORM MIDCO, INC.; SERENOVA, LLC
Reel/Frame 044030/0105 →
SECURITY INTEREST Recorded Oct 13, 2017
From: SERENOVA, LLC, FORMERLY KNOWN AS LIVEOPS CLOUD PLATFORM, LLC; LO PLATFORM MIDCO, INC.; TELSTRAT LLC
To: GOLDMAN SACHS SPECIALTY LENDING GROUP, L.P., AS COLLATERAL AGENT
Reel/Frame 043855/0947 →
CHANGE OF NAME Recorded Mar 20, 2017
From: LIVEOPS CLOUD PLATFORM, LLC.
To: SERENOVA, LLC.
Reel/Frame 041653/0292 →
PATENT SECURITY AGREEMENT Recorded Dec 24, 2015
From: LO PLATFORM MIDCO, INC.; LIVEOPS CLOUD PLATFORM, LLC
To: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
Reel/Frame 037372/0063 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Nov 3, 2015
From: LIVEOPS, INC.
To: LIVEOPS CLOUD PLATFORM, LLC
Reel/Frame 036946/0577 →
CORRECTIVE ASSIGNMENT TO CORRECT THE 2ND CONVEYING PARTY NAME PREVIOUSLY RECORDED AT REEL: 023476 FRAME: 0557. ASSIGNOR(S) HEREBY CONFIRMS THE ASSIGNMENT. Recorded Oct 29, 2015
From: APPARAO, VIDUR; BROWNE, NIALL; BAILEY, SCOTT; KING, JEREMY
To: LIVEOPS, INC.
Reel/Frame 036991/0458 →
ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNOR'S INTEREST Recorded Oct 28, 2009
From: APPARAO, VIDUR; BROWN, NIALL; BAILEY, SCOTT; KING, JEREMY
To: LIVEOPS, INC.
Reel/Frame 023476/0557 →